Effect of mechanical planting and weeding on yield, water-use efficiency and cost of production under modified system of rice intensification


Abstract views: 145 / PDF downloads: 114

Authors

  • P C MOHAPATRA Central Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha 753 006
  • M DIN Central Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha 753 006
  • B C PARIDA Central Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha 753 006
  • S P PATEL Central Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha 753 006
  • P MISHRA Central Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha 753 006

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v82i3.15979

Keywords:

Mat type transplanter, Power weeder, Sprouted seed drill, SRI, Star-cono weeder, Water-use efficiency

Abstract

Efficiency of planting and weeding equipments developed at Central Rice Research Institute, Cuttack was compared with traditional method of planting and weeding in relation to biomass yield, water-use efficiency (WUE) and net returns from SRI. The study showed that low plant density and high labour cost of SRI resulted in lower yield (3.77 against 4.52 tonnes/ha) and net returns (₹2 650 against ₹ 9 312/ha) compared to traditional method of cultivation. Mechanized planting and weeding of SRI enhanced its productivity to 4.24 tonnes/ha and profitability to ₹ 12 192/ ha. But it required that age of seedlings is increased from 8 to 16 days and density of hills is increased from 11 to 31/m2 with 4 (instead of single) plants/hill. Among mechanical planters, seeding by sprouted seeds on puddled soil by drum seeder was found to have significantly lower planting cost (₹ 515 against ₹ 1 332/ha) and lower total cost of production (₹ 16 355 against ₹17 767/ha). Average WUE (0.61 kg/m3) and grain yield (4.18 tonnes/ha) in weeded plots was double to un-weeded plots. Average cost of (single) weeding by weeders was ₹ 2 509 against ₹ 5 688/ha of manual weeding. Among the weeders, high efficiency in weed destruction and soil churning by star-cono weeder resulted in highest grain productivity and profitability in its favour.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Guohui M. 2010. Report on workshop on the System of Rice Intensification. Hangzhou, China, 28 February–2 March 2010. Mohapatra P C. 2006. Water use efficiency of rice cultivars under rainfed ecosystem. Oryza. 43 (1): 33–6.

Mohapatra P C, Din M, Parida B C and Patel S P. 2011. Effect of plant density, seedling age, nutrient level, power weeder and transplanters on yield, water use efficiency and cost of planting and weeding under system of rice intensification (SRI). Engineering interventions in agriculture. National Seminar on Agricultural Engineering, 353–9. IGKV, Raipur.

Manjunatha M V, Reddy M, Shashidhar B G S D and Joshi V R. 2009. Studies on the performance of self-propelled rice transplanter and its effect on crop yield. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 22(2): 385–7.

Pandey M M. 2002. (Ed.). Technical Bulletin. Farm Implements and Machinery, AICRP, CIAE, Bhopal.

Parida B C. 2003. Development and evaluation of Star-cum- cono weeder for rice. Proceedings of International Seminar on Downsizing Technology for Rural Development. (1): 136–8.

Tajuddin A. 2009. Development of power weeder for low land rice. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (90): 15–7.

Downloads

Submitted

2012-03-12

Published

2012-03-12

Issue

Section

Short-Communication

How to Cite

MOHAPATRA, P. C., DIN, M., PARIDA, B. C., PATEL, S. P., & MISHRA, P. (2012). Effect of mechanical planting and weeding on yield, water-use efficiency and cost of production under modified system of rice intensification. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 82(3), 280–3. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v82i3.15979
Citation