Bioassay studies for bruchid (Callosobruchus chinensis) resistance in


Abstract views: 65 / PDF downloads: 28

Authors

  • JAGGAL SOMAPPA G B Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand 263 145
  • NASEER MOHAMMAD G B Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand 263 145
  • G C BAJPAI G B Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand 263 145
  • S K VERMA G B Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand 263 145
  • REENA JOSHI G B Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand 263 145

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v82i3.15981

Keywords:

Bioassay, Bruchid resistance, Inter-specific progenies, Pigeonpea

Abstract

The results of bioassay indicated that per cent adult emergence, mean time of adult emergence and per cent weight loss were most important parameters which helped in categorizing the genotypes into susceptible or resistant. Out of nine interspecific progenies, one of progeny UPAS120 × scarabaeiodes was found least susceptible for Callosobruchus chinensis, while other progenies in the descending order for resistance to bruchid were UPAS120 × cajanifolius, PA134 × C. scarabaeiodes, PA134 × C. acutifolius, ICPL84023 × C. cajanifolius and ICPL84023 × scarabaeiodes. Since genetic resistance is the cheapest source of resistance in managing the biotic stress, the resistant material found in this study will definitely useful in the pigeonpea improvement programme especially for bruchid resistance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Das A, Pulin P and Sarmah B K. 2005. Callosobruchus chinensis L. (Bruchids) cause damage to number of important pulse grain’s during storage. Legume Research 28 (1): 74–6.

Kitch L W and Shade R E. 1993. Seed and pod resistance to Callosobruchus maculatus among various vigna species. Insect Science and its Application 14 (3): 333–41.

Patel V K, Chaudhuri N and Senapati S K. 2005. Biology of pulse beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis Linn.) as influenced by feeding of different grain pulses. Agricultural Science Digest 25 (4): 254–6.

Patro P, Sahu, K C and Sahoo P. 2007. Effect of different levels of Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) infestation on deterioration of some pulse seeds. Legume Research 30 (4): 301–4.

Prevett P F. 1961. Field Infestation of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) pods by beetles of the families bruchidae and curculionidae in northern Nigeria. Bulletin of Entomological Research 52: 635– 46.

Redden R J and McGuire J. 1983. The genetic evaluation of bruchid resistance in seed of cowpea (Callosobruchus maculatus, storage pest, Nigeria). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 34 (6): 707–15.

Downloads

Submitted

2012-03-12

Published

2012-03-12

Issue

Section

Short-Communication

How to Cite

SOMAPPA, J., MOHAMMAD, N., BAJPAI, G. C., VERMA, S. K., & JOSHI, R. (2012). Bioassay studies for bruchid (Callosobruchus chinensis) resistance in. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 82(3), 288–90. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v82i3.15981
Citation