Effect of soybean yellow mottle mosaic virus (Gammacarmovirus glycinis) on growth, yield and seed quality of soybean (Glycine max) cultivars
319 / 274
Keywords:
Germination percentage, Seed quality, Seed yield, Soybean, Soybean yellow mottle mosaic virusAbstract
Gammacarmovirus glycinis [Soybean yellow mottle mosaic virus, (SYMMV)] is an important viral pathogen associated with mosaic and mottle symptoms in leguminous crops including soybean (Glycine max L.). The present study was carried out during the year 2022 at ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi to understand the impact of SYMMV on various growth, seed yield and quality parameters in 18 soybean (Glycine max L.) cultivars through mechanical sap inoculation under controlled environmental conditions. SYMMV infection significantly influenced the plant height, number of pods and seed yield/plant, 100-seed weight, germination%, seedling length, seedling fresh weight and dry weight, seedling vigour index-I and II across all cultivars. Cultivars like SL-688 and SL-744 exhibited notable reduction in plant height whereas number of pods and seed yield/plant was recorded low in SL-744, SL-958, SL-1104 and JS-335. Great variation in 100-seed weight was observed for the cultivars MACS-450 and MACS 1281 compared to other cultivars. Seed germination was significantly reduced in cultivars SL-688 and SL-744 whereas seedling length was greatly influenced in the cultivars SL-744, JS-335, DSB-23 and MACS-57. Both seedling vigour index I and II were negatively affected particularly in Sl-525, SL-688, SL-744, DSB-23, and JS-335. The soybean cultivars SL-525, SL-688, SL-744, SL-958, SL-1104, JS-335, DSB-23, MACS-57 and MACS-1281 exhibited the great reduction in growth and seed quality parameters confirming their high susceptibility to SYMMV infection. The study highlights that while all cultivars experienced some negative effects, the degree of impact varied significantly. The findings of this study points to the importance of monitoring and managing SYMMV infection in soybean crop to prevent significant agricultural losses and maintain seed quality and crop productivity.
Downloads
References
Abdul-Baki A A and Anderson J D. 1973. Vigour determination in soybean seed by multiple criteria. Crop Science 13(6): 630–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1973.0011183X001300060013x
Akhtar K P, Sarwar G, Abbas G, Asghar M J, Sarwar N and Shah T M. 2011. Screening of mungbean germplasm against mungbean yellow mosaic India virus and its vector Bemisia tabaci. Crop Protection 30(9): 1202–09. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2011.05.012
Arif M, Stephen M and Hassan S. 2002. Effect of soybean mosaic potyvirus on growth and yield components of commercial soybean varieties. Plant Pathology Journal 1(2): 54–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ppj.2002.54.57
Asad S, Sohail F, Ali M, Shah H and Ali N. 2006. Screening of soybean entries against various diseases under natural conditions during autumn 2001 at NARC. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research 9(4): 78–80.
Babalola P O, Salaudeen M T, Gana A S and Muhammad A N. 2018. Preliminary assessment of growth and seed production in advanced cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) lines infected with cucumber mosaic virus. Production Agriculture and Technology Journal 14(1): 125–31.
Bellaloui N and Mengistu A. 2007. Seed composition is influenced by irrigation regimes and cultivar differences in soybean. Irrigation Science 26: 261–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-007-0091-y
Bellaloui N, Mengistu A, Fisher D K and Abel C A. 2012. Soybean seed composition constituents as affected by drought and Phomopsis in phomopsis susceptible and resistant genotypes. Journal of Crop Improvement 26: 428–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2011.651774
Bhat A I, Jain R K, Varma A and Lal S K. 2002. Nucleocapsid protein gene sequence studies suggest that soybean bud blight is caused by a strain of groundnut bud necrosis virus. Current Science 82(11): 1389–92.
Bueso E, Serrano R, Pallas V and Navarro JAS. 2017. Seed tolerance to deterioration in Arabidopsis is affected by virus infection. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 116: 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.04.020
Buhari S M, Salaudeen M T and Wada A C. 2022. Effects of cucumber mosaic virus on yield components and yield of Bambara groundnut. Bulletin of Scientific Research 4(2): 35–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54392/bsr2225
Byamukama E, Robertson A E and Nutter F W. 2015. Bean pod mottle virus time of infection influences soybean yield, yield components and quality. Plant Disease 99(7): 1026–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-11-14-1107-RE
Cao M, Zhang S, Li M, Liu Y, Dong P, Li S, Mi K, Li R and Zhou Y. 2019. Discovery of four novel viruses associated with flower yellowing disease of green sichuan pepper (Zanthoxylum armatum) by virome analysis. Viruses 11(8): 696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/v11080696
Chand P and Varma J P. 1983. Effect of yellow mosaic on growth components and yield of mungbean and urdbean. Haryana Agrilcultural University Journal of Research 13(1): 98–102.
Congdon B S, Baulch J R and Coutts B A. 2020. Impact of turnip yellows virus infection on seed yield of an open-pollinated and hybrid canola cultivar when inoculated at different growth stages. Virus Research 277: 197847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2019.197847
Da Silva F B, Muller C, Bello V H, Watanabe L F M, De Marchi B R, Fusco L M and Krause-Sakate R. 2020. Effects of cowpea mild mottle virus on soybean cultivars in Brazil. Peer J 8: e9828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9828
De Breuil S, Giolitti F J, Bejerman N and Lenardon S L. 2012. Effects of cucumber mosaic virus on the yield and yield components of peanut. Journal of Plant Pathology 94: 669–73.
Escalante C, Sanz-Saez A, Jacobson A, Otulak-Koziel K, Koziel E, Balcom K, Zhao C and Conner K. 2024. Plant virus transmission during seed development and implications to plant defense system. Frontiers in Plant Science 15: 1385456 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1385456
ISTA. 2024. Seed Testing Rules. International Seed Testing Association, Barsserssorf, Switzerland.
Jin L, Qin Q, Wang Y, Pu Y, Liu L, Wen X, Ji S, Wu J, Wei C, Ding B and Li Y. 2016. Rice dwarf virus P2 protein hijacks auxin signaling by directly targeting the rice OsIAA10 protein, enhancing viral infection and disease development. PLoS Pathogens 12: e1005847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005847
Li S, Moon J S, Lee S H and Domier L L. 2009. First report of soybean yellow mottle mosaic virus in soybean in north America. Plant Disease 93: 1214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-93-11-1214B
Mandhare V K and Gawade S B. 2010. Effect of seed borne soybean mosaic virus infection on quality and yield parameters in soybean. Legume Research 33(1): 43–49.
Nam M, Kim S M, Domier L L, Koh S, Moon J K, Choi H S, Kim H G, Moon J S and Lee S H. 2009. Nucleotide sequence and genome organization of a newly identified member of the genus Carmovirus, soybean yellow mottle mosaic virus from soybean. Archives of Virology 154: 1679–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-009-0480-z
Rahoutei J, Luqueb I G and Barona M. 2000. Inhibition of photosynthesis by viral infection: Effect on PSII structure and function. Physiologia Plantarum 110: 286–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2000.110220.x
Ramteke R, Gupta G K, Gill B S, Varma R K and Lal S K. 2007. Development of soybean lines resistant to yellow mosaic virus. Soybean Research 5: 71–74.
Sandra N, Jailani A A K, Jain R K and Mandal B. 2017. Genome characterization, infectivity assays of in vitro and in vivo infectious transcripts of soybean yellow mottle mosaic virus from India reveals a novel short mild genotype. Virus Research 232: 96–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2017.02.006
Sandra N, Tripathi A, Dikshit H K, Mandal B and Jain R K. 2020. Seed transmission of a distinct soybean yellow mottle mosaic virus strain identified from India in natural and experimental hosts. Virus Research 280: 197903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2020.197903
Sandra N, Kumar A, Sharma P, Kapoor R, Jain R K and Mandal B. 2015. Diagnosis of a new variant of soybean yellow mottle mosaic virus with extended host-range in India. Virus Disease 26(4): 304–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13337-015-0288-2
Sandra N, Tripathi A, Lal S K, Kumar A, Mandal B and Jain R K. 2019. First report of soybean yellow mottle mosaic virus on soybean (Glycine max) in India. Plant Disease 102(8): 1673. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-01-18-0080-PDN
Shalitin D, Wang Y, Omid A, Gal-On A and Wolf S. 2002. Cucumber mosaic virus movement protein affects sugar metabolism and transport in tobacco and melon plants. Plant Cell and Environment 25: 989–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00888.x
Soybean production 2023/2024. Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA. https://fas.usda.gov/data/production/commodity/2222000
Srikant M, Nagamani S, Atul K, Sandeep K L, Sanjay K L and Bikash M 2025. Analysis of soybean cultivars response to mosaic and mottle disease caused by soybean yellow mottle mosaic virus. Virus Disease 36: 41–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13337-024-00905-7
USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) 2023. https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/production
Wei Z Y, Jiang C, Mao C Y, Zhang H H, Miao R P, Yan F, Chen J, Li M and Sun Z T. 2020. First report of soybean yellow mottle mosaic virus infecting soybean in China. Plant Disease 104(9): 2531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-01-20-0196-PDN
Wrather J A, Anderson T R, Arsyad D M, Tan Y, Ploper L D, Porta-Puglia A, Ram H H and Yorinori J T. 2001. Soybean disease loss estimates for the top ten soybean-producing countries in 1998. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 23(2): 115–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07060660109506918
Zhao S and Li Yi. 2021. Current understanding of the interplays between host hormones and plant viral infections. PLOS Pathogens 17(2): e1009242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009242
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.