Synergistic agronomic practices in redgram (Cajanus cajan) productivity and soil health enhancement under semi-arid tropics

P M  SHANMUGAM

doi:10.56093/ijas.v95i3.162427

Authors

P M SHANMUGAM Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641 003, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v95i3.162427

Keywords:

Economics, Forms of P, Nutrient balance, Production potential, Redgram

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during rainy (kharif) season of 2020 and 2021 at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu to study the impact of integrated phosphorus management in redgram (Cajanus cajan L.) intercropping systems under irrigated conditions. Redgram variety CO (Rg 7) was chosen as test crop. The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design (SPD) in three replications. The main plot comprised of intercropping systems, viz. sole redgram, redgram intercropped with soybean (Glycine max L.), greengram [Vigna radiata (L.) R. wilczek] and cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. The sub plot consisted 3 forms of P, viz. Single super phosphate (SSP), enriched Mussoorie rock phosphate (MRP) + phosphobacteria and SSP (1/3^rd) + enriched MRP (2/3^rd) + phosphobacteria and 2 levels of P, viz. 50 and 62.5 kg P₂O₅/ha. The higher redgram grain equivalent yield (1207 kg/ha), net return (₹51,810/ha) and B: C ratio (2.74) were recorded under redgram intercropped with greengram followed by redgram intercropped with soybean, with corresponding values of 1,077 kg/ha, ₹48,141/ha and 2.29, respectively. With regards to various sources of P tried, integrated application of SSP (1/3^rd) and enriched MRP (2/3^rd) with phosphobacteria registered higher yield (957 kg/ha) of redgram, which was comparable with application of SSP. Regarding levels of P, application of 125% of recommended P (62.5 kg P₂O₅/ha) was recorded higher yield in redgram over 100% of recommended P (50 kg P₂O₅/ha) over the years. Considering the overall monetary returns of different redgram intercropping systems, application of 62.5 kg P2O5/ha in combination as SSP (1/3^rd) + enriched MRP (2/3^rd) along with phosphobacteria to redgram + greengram intercropping registered higher net return and B: C ratio.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahamad A, Kumar N and Yadav D. 2018. Integrated nutrient management in pigeonpea-based intercropping systems. Indian Journal of Agronomy 63(1): 39–44.

Bhardwaj R, Kushwaha H S, Birla J, Turkar Y and Patida K. 2023. Studies on nutrient management in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) millsp.] based intercropping system. Legume Research 46(8): 1048–53.

Dudhade D D, Deshmukh G P, Harer P N and Patil J V. 2009. Studies on intercropping of pulse crops with pigeonpea under rainfed condition. Legume Research 32(3): 215–17.

FAO. 2021–22. Food and Agriculture Organization Statistics.

Garud H S, Asewar B V, Khazi G S, Khargkharate V K and Gadade G D. 2018. Effect of intercropping systems on pigeon pea equivalent yield under different land configuration. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 7(6): 525–27.

Girijesh G K, Basavaraj M, Sharanabasappa and Renukaswamy N S. 2017. Effect of legumes as intercrop in maize (Zea mays L.) on soil fertility, maize equivalent yield and nutrient recycling. International Journal of Pure and Applied Bioscience 5(5): 693–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.2776

Gomez K A and Gomez A A. 1984. Analysis of data from a series of experiments. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, pp. 316–56, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

Humphries E C. 1956. Mineral components and ash analysis. Modern Methods of Plant Analysis, pp. 468–502, Vol 1. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-25300-7_17

Indiastat. 2021–22. https://www.indiastat.com/data/agriculture Jackson M L. 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis, pp. 67–214. Prentice

hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi.

Kumar P, Rana K S and Rana D S. 2012. Effect of planting system and phosphorus with biofertilizer on the performance of sole and intercropped pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) under rainfed condition. Indian Journal of Agronomy 57(2): 127–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v57i2.4624

Kumar U and Kushwaha H S. 2018. Studies on nutrient management in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L) Millsp] based intercropping system of urd bean, sesame and mung bean. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 7(2): 490–94.

Malik J K, Singh R, Thenua O V S and Kumar A. 2013. Response of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) + mungbean (Phaseolus radiatus) intercropping system to phosphorus and biofertilizers. Legume Research 36(4): 323–30.

Manjunatha N, Halepyati A S, Chittapur B M, Mastanreddy B G, Amaregouda A and Rao K N. 2019. Effect of different intercrops on growth parameters of sole and intercropped transplanted pigeonpea. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 8(12): 470–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.812.062

Meena B S and Sharma D D. 2012. Efficiency of sources of phosphorus and bioregulators on pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan). Legume Research 35(2): 149–53.

Olsen S R, Cole C V, Watnabe F S and Dean D A. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circular no: 939.

Sekhon F S, Singh T and Singh S. 2023. Growth, phenology and yield of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) as affected by intercropping systems and application of nutrients level to intercrops. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 88(3): 509–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i3.78758

Shanmugam P M. 2008. Production potential and economics of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) based intercropping system with different levels and forms of P. Journal of Farming Systems Research and Development 14(1): 118–22.

Sharma A, Pandit S R, Dharmaraj P S and Mohan C. 2012. Response of pigeonpea to biofertilizers in pigeonpea based intercropping systems under rainfed conditions. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 25(3): 322–25.

Stanford S and English L. 1949. Use of flame photometer in rapid soil tests for K and Ca. Agronomy Journal 41: 446–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1949.00021962004100090012x

Subbaiah B V and Asija G L. 1956. Rapid procedure for estimation of available nitrogen in soil. Current Science 25: 259–260.

Varatharajan T, Choudhary A K, Pooniya V, Dass A and Harish M N. 2019. Integrated crop management practices for enhancing productivity, profitability, production-efficiency and monetary- efficiency of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) in Indo-Gangetic plains region. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 89(3): 559–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i3.87606

Vijayaprabhakar A and Jayanthi C. 2018. Study on growth and yield response of redgram in various intercropping system and its economics under different land configurations in north western agro climatic zone of Tamil Nadu. Madras Agricultural Journal 105(1–3): 7–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29321/MAJ.2018.000092

Yadav R L. 1981. Nitrogen and phosphorous balance of soil as affected by sugarcane based intensive crop rotations. Indian Journal of Agronomy 26(3): 267–71.