Wide hybridisation and introgression of anthracnose resistance in thebackground of local landraces of rajmash (Phaseolus vulgaris)


97 / 58

Authors

  • SANJEEV KUMAR Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Chatha, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir 180 009, India image/svg+xml
  • ARCHANA JOSHI SAHA Nuclear Agriculture and Biotechnology Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC), Trombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400 085, India image/svg+xml
  • NEERAJ KOTWAL Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Chatha, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir 180 009, India image/svg+xml
  • RUCKU GUPTA Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Chatha, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir 180 009, India image/svg+xml

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v96i5.168263

Keywords:

Common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris, Phaseolus coccineus, Phaseolus acutifolius, Inter-specific hybridisation

Abstract

The present study was aimed to broaden the genetic base of rajmash (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) by conducting a wide hybridisation programme under controlled conditions. The study involved crosses between cultivated and wild Phaseolus vulgaris and inter-specific crosses of P. vulgaris with P. coccineus, P. acutifolius and P. lunatus. The success of hybrid establishment and their comprehensive development was up to 18.28% in intra-specific hybrids, with accessions of secondary gene pool 3.94–9.04%, with tertiary gene pool and with quarterly gene pool only 0.5%. However with mentor pollinated, the achievement rate of intra-specific hybrids was 16.84%. On the basis of pooled mean performance, RIL (Recombinant inbred line) 14 of Bhaderwah Local (BL) × Poonch Local (PL) in F4 and
F5 generations showed maximum seed yield (15.56 g/plant) along with moderately resistance against anthracnose. Similarly, RIL11of mentor pollinated inter-specific hybrid in F4 and F5 generations showed higher seed yield (29.79 g/plant) along with resistance against anthracnose. The application of wild species of rajmash i.e. P. coccineus, P. acutifolius and P. lunatus for the improvement of rajmash was just initiated and success rate is very less in India and remains limited. Promising RILs of both intra and inter-specific hybrids may be further evaluated for stability in performance for varietal development programme in the background of local land races of rajmash of Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bhagat S, Kumar S and Dogra S. 2023. Identification of induced mutants for morpho-physiological and biochemical traits of rajmash (Phaseolus vulgaris). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 93(7): 1338–43.

Bhagat S, Kumar S, Saha A J, Kashyap S C and Kumawat R. 2024. Induced genetic variability for quantitative and biochemical traits of local land races of rajmash (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) of north western Himalayas. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 94(11): 1201–06.

Blair M W, Giraldo M C, Buendia T H F E, Duque M C and Beebe S E. 2006. Microsatellite marker diversity in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 113: 100–09. DOI:10.1007/s00122-006-0276-4

Kumar S, Choudhary H K, and Singh A K. 2022. Identification of stable genotypes for grain yield and its components in mungbean

(Vigna radiata L.). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 92(7): 847–52.

Kumar S, Singh M, Blair M W, Malhotra N, Sharma J P and Gupta R. 2021. Introgression of common bean species into the background of locally adapted common bean landraces. Euphytica 217: 52. http://doi.org/10.1007/s/0681-021-02784-1

Mahuku G S, Jara C E, Cajiao C and Beebe S. 2002. Sources of resistance to Colletotrichum lindemuthianum in the secondary gene pool of Phaseolus vulgaris and in crosses of primary and secondary gene pools. Plant Disease 86: 1383–87.

Munoz L C, Blair M W, Duque M C, Tohme J and Roca W. 2004. Introgression in common bean tepary bean interspecific congruity-backcross lines as measured by AFLP markers. Crop Science 44: 637–45.

Padha R, Kumar S and Kumawat R. 2025. Unveiling the genetic diversity in horsegram (Macrotyloma uniflorum L.) genotypes through morphological and microsatellite (SSR) markers. Scientific Reports 15: 34861. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-10387-2

Richard C P and Sheerens J C. 2006. Seven diverse Phaseolus germplasm lines derived through inter specific hybridisation of common bean and tepary bean. Horticulture Science 41(1): 266–69.

Schoonhoven A V and Pastor C M A. 1987. (In) Standard System for the Evaluation of Bean Germplasm. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, Cali, Colombia, 56p.

Singh M, Kumar T, Sood S, Malhotra N, Rani U, Singh S, Singh I, Bindra S, Kumar S and Kumar S. 2022. Identification of promising chickpea interspecific derivatives for agromorphological and major biotic traits. Frontiers in Plant Science 13: 941372. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.941372

Singh S P and Munoz C G. 1999. Resistance to common bacterial blight among Phaseolus species and common bean improvement. Crop Science 39: 80–89.

Singh S P. 2001. Broadening the genetic base of common bean cultivars. A review. Crop Science 41: 1659–75.

Smartt J. 1970. Inter-specific hybridization between cultivated American species of the genus Phaseolus. Euphytica 19: 480–89.

Sofi P A, Shafi S, Fatima S, Rani S, Ahmad R, Banoo A, Gani S, Majeed S, Zargar, Padder B A, Zaffar A, Nabi A and Jha P. 2023. Characterization of western Himalayan small-seeded red beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) for yield, quality and resilience. Plant Genetic Resources 20(5): 337–34.

Steltler R F and Ager A A. 1984. Mentor effects in pollen interactions. (In) Cellular Interactions. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology. 17thedn., pp. 609–23. Linskans H F and Heslop-Harrison J (Eds). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Downloads

Submitted

2025-06-26

Published

2026-05-05

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

KUMAR, S. ., SAHA, A. J. ., KOTWAL, N., & GUPTA, R. . (2026). Wide hybridisation and introgression of anthracnose resistance in thebackground of local landraces of rajmash (Phaseolus vulgaris). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 96(5), 623–630. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v96i5.168263
Citation