Wide hybridization and introgression of anthracnose resistance in the background of local land races of rajmash (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

SANJEEV  KUMAR; ARCHANA JOSHI  SAHA; NEERAJ KOTWAL; RUCKU  GUPTA

doi:10.56093/ijas.v96i5.168263

Authors

SANJEEV KUMAR Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Chatha, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir 180 009, India
ARCHANA JOSHI SAHA Nuclear Agriculture and Biotechnology Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC), Trombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400 085, India
NEERAJ KOTWAL Regional Horticulture Research Station(Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu), Bhaderwah, Doda, Jammu and Kashmir 182 222, India
RUCKU GUPTA Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Chatha, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir 180 009, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v96i5.168263

Keywords:

Common bean, Inter-specific hybridization, Phaseolus acutifolius, Phaseolus coccineus, Phaseolus vulgaris

Abstract

An attempt of wide hybridization was made between Phaseolus vulgaris cultivated lines × Phaseolus vulgaris wild lines, Phaseolus vulgairs × Phaseolus coccineus, Phaseolus vulgaris × Phaseolus acutifolius and Phaseolus vulgairs × Phaseolus lunatus under controlled conditions to widen the genetic base of rajmash at School of Biotechnology, SKUAST J during kharif 2021 and 2022. RILs of both intra and inter specific hybrids of F4 and F5 generations were evaluated for anthracnose and agronomical traits at Regional Horticulture Research Station Bhaderwah, of SKUAST J during kharif 2023 and 2024. The success of hybrid establishment and their comprehensive development was up to 18.28% in intra-specific hybrids with accessions of secondary gene pool, 3.94–9.04% with tertiary gene pool and only 0.5% with quarterly gene pool. However, with mentor pollinated the achievement rate of intra-specific hybrids was 16.84%. On the basis of pooled mean performance RIL₁₄ of Bhaderwah local × Poonch Local in F4 and F5 generations showed maximum seed yield (15.56 g/plant) along with moderate resistance against anthracnose. Similarly, RIL₁₁of mentor pollinated inter-specific hybrid in F4 and F5 generations showed higher seed yield (29.79g/plant) along with resistance against anthracnose. The application of wild species of rajmash i.e., P. coccineus, P. acutifolius and Phaseolus lunatus for the improvement of rajmash was just initiated and success rate is very less in India and remains limited. Promising RILs of both intra and inter-specific hybrids may be further evaluated for stability in performance for varietal development programme in the background of local land races of rajmash of Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

RUCKU GUPTA, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Chatha, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir 180 009, India

SRF School of Biotechnology SKUAST Jammu

References

REFERENCES;

1. Belivanis T and Dore C 1986. Inter-specific hybridization of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and Phaseolus angustissimus A. Gray using in vitro embryo culture. Plant Cell Rep., 5:329-331.

2. Blair M W, Giraldo M C, Buendia Tovar H F E, Duque M C, Beebe S E 2006. Microsatellite marker diversity in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theor. Appl. Genet.,113:100-109. Doi:10.1007/s00122-006-0276-4.

3. Chacon S M I, Pickersgill B, Debouck, D G 2005. Domestication patterns in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and the origin of the Mesoamerican and Andean cultivated races. Theor. Appl. Genet. 110: 432-444.

4. Freytag G F, and Debouck D G. 2002. Taxonomy, distribution, and ecology of the genus Phaseolus (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae) in North America, Mexico and Central America. Bot. Res. Inst. of Texas, Brit Press, Ft. Worth, TX.

5. Gepts P F, Aragao E de Barros, Blair M W, Brondani R, Broughton W J, Galasso I, Hernández G, Kami J, Lariguet P, McClean P, Melotto M, Miklas P, Pauls P, Pedrosa-Harand A, Porch T, Sánchez F, Sparvoli F, and Yu K. 2007. Genomics of Phaseolus beans, a major source of dietary protein and micronutrients in the Tropics. In P.H. Moore and R. Ming (ed.) Genomics of tropical crop plants. Springer, Berlin. (In press).

6. Honma S. 1956. A bean interspecific hybrid. J. Hered. 47: 217-220

7. Koinange E M K and Gepts P. 1992. Hybrid weakness in wild Phaseolus vulgaris L. J. Hered. 83:135-139.

8. Kour Balbir, Kour Gurmeet, Kaul Sanjana and Dhar Manoj K. 2012. Screening of Phaseolus vulgaris cultivars growing in various areas of Jammu and Kashmir for anthracnose resistance. Int. J Scient. and Rese. Publ. 2(6):1-8.

9. Kumar Sanjeev, Singh Mohar, Blair MW, Malhotra Nikhil, Sharma JP and Gupta Rucku (2021). Introgression of common bean species into the background of named landraces of north western Indian Himalayas towards diversification of cultivated gene pool. Euphytica 2021 217:52 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-021-02784-1(0123456789().,-volV)

10. Mahuku, G S, Jara, C E, Cajiao C, and Beebe S. 2002. Sources of resistance to Colletotrichum lindemuthianum in the secondary gene pool of Phaseolus vulgaris and in crosses of primary and secondary gene pools. Plant Dis. 86:1383-1387.

11. Mendel G. 1865. Versuche uber Pflanzenhybriden Verhandl.d.Naturforsch.Ver. Brun 4: 3-47.

12. Michurin1950.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0074769608610803.

13. Miklas N P, Kelly J D, Beebe S E and Blair M W 2006. Common bean breeding for resistance against biotic and abiotic stresses: From classical to MAS breeding. Euphytica 147:105-131.

14. Miklas P N, Grafton K F, Kelly J D, Schwartz H F, and Steadman J R 1998. Registration of four white mold resistant dry bean germplasm lines: I9365-3, I9365-5, I9365-31, and 92BG-7. Crop Sci. 38:1728.

15. Mogotosi K K. 2006. Phaseolus acutifolius A. Gray. In Plant Resources of Tropical Africa 1. Cereals and Pulses; Brink, M., Belay, G., Eds.; PROTA Foundation: Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 133-137.

16. Mok D W S, Mok M.C. and Abakoarihanta A R 1978. Inter-specific hybridization of Phaseolus vulgaris with P. lunatus and P. acutifoliuus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 52: 209-215.

17. Montero-Rojas, M, Ortiz M, Beaver, JS, Siritunga D. 2013. Genetic, morphological and cyanogen content evaluation of a new collection of Caribbean Lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.) landraces. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2013, doi:10.1007/s10722-013-9989-9.

18. Munoz L C, Blair M W, Duque M C, Tohme J and Roca W. 2004. Introgression in common bean tepary bean interspecific congruity-backcross lines as measured by AFLP Markers. Published in Crop Sci. 44:637-645.

19. Parker J P and Michaels T E. 1986. Simple genetic control of hybrid plant development in inter-specific crosses between Phaseolus vulgaris L. and P. acutifolius A. Gray. Plant Breed. 97:315-323.

20. Porch T G, Ramirez V H and Santana D. 2009. Evaluation of common bean for drought tolerance in Juana Diaz, Puerto Rico. J. Agron. Crop. Sci. 195: 328-334.

21. Richard C P and Sheerens J C. 2006. Seven diverse Phaseolus germplasm lines derived through inter specific hybridization of common bean and tepary bean. Hort. Science 41(1): 266-269.

22. Schoonhoven A Van, and Pastor-Corrales, M A 1987. In: Standard System for the Evaluation of Bean Germplasm. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, Cali, Colombia, Pages 25-27.

23. Shao F M. 1980. Studies on bean anthracnose in southern highlands of Tanzania, (MSc Agriculture. Thesis, University of Dares saalam 188 pp.

24. Singh S P 2001. Broadening the genetic base of common bean cultivars. A review. Crop Science 41: 1659-1675.

25. Singh S P and Munoz C G. 1999. Resistance to common bacterial blight among Phaseolus species and common bean improvement. Crop Sci. 39:80-89.

26. Singh S P, Teran H, Schwartz H F, Otto K and Lema M. 2009a. Introgressing white mold resistance from Phaseolus species of the secondary gene pool into common bean. Crop Sci. 49:1629-1637.

27. Smartt J. 1970. Inter-specific, hybridization between cultivated American species of the genus Phaseolus. Euphytica 19: 480-489.

28. Thomas C V, Manshardt R M, Waines J G. 1983. Teparies as a source of useful traits for improving common beans. Desert Plants 5: 43-48.