Enhancing wheat productivity and economics through microbe-mediated phosphorus fertilization in wheat (Triticum aestivum) + mustard (Brassica juncea) intercropping systems of the semi-arid region of India
500 / 350
Keywords:
Growth parameters, Phosphorus nutrition, Productivity, ProfitabilityAbstract
The study was carried out during the winter (rabi) season of 2021–22 and 2022–23 at ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi to evaluate the impact of microbe-mediated phosphorus fertilization on the growth, yield attributes and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in intercropping systems. Four cropping systems (CSs), viz. CS1, Sole wheat (control); CS2, Sole mustard (Brassica juncea); CS3, Wheat + mustard (5:1); CS4, Wheat + mustard (5:2) and six P management strategies (PMS) viz. PMS1, Control; PMS2, RDF; PMS3, 75% RDP + PSB (0.5 kg/ha); PMS4, 75%RDP + PROM (125 kg/ha); PMS5, 75% RDP + PROM (125 kg/ha) + PSB (0.5 kg/ha); PMS6, No RDP + PROM (125 kg/ha) + PSB (0.5 kg/ha) in a factorial randomized block design (FRBD) with three replications. Among the PMS; 75% RDP + PROM + PSB (PMS5) significantly outperformed others. It recorded the highest wheat equivalent yield (56.86 q/ha), which was 34.5% higher than the control (PMS1). This was accompanied by the highest 1000 grain weight (41.8 g), tillers no. (509.7/m²), harvest index (43.1%) and net return (₹129.3 ×10³/ha), with a benefit-cost ratio of 3.28 (vs. 2.76 in PMS1). Additionally, PMS5 improved dry matter accumulation at harvest (1001 g/m2, a 23.1% increase over PMS1), leaf area index (5.73), and crop growth rate (4.57 g/m²/day at 40 DAS, up by 37.3% over PMS1). In terms of cropping systems, CS4 (wheat + mustard in 5:2 row ratio) proved superior with the highest wheat equivalent yield (56.16 q/ha), representing a 9.6% increase over sole wheat (CS1). This system also enhanced dry matter accumulation (1000 g/m2), crop growth rate at 80 DAS (18.9 g/m²/day), and net returns (₹82.2×10³/ha), while maintaining a high benefit-cost ratio (2.44). These results underscore the potential of 75% RDP + PROM + PSB and strategic intercropping (wheat + mustard in 5:2 row ratio) with mustard for improving productivity and profitability and support the adoption of biologically enriched P sources to reduce dependency on chemical fertilisers.
Downloads
References
Banik P, Dey A and Maity A. 2022. Role of biofertilisers in phosphorus solubilization and its effect on crop productivity-A review. Agricultural Reviews 43(1): 10–20.
Bunemann E K, Steinebrunner F, Smithson P C, Frossard E and Oberson A. 2011. Phosphorus dynamics in a highly weathered soil as revealed by isotopic labeling techniques. Soil Science Society of America Journal 75: 1406–18.
FAO. 2023. FAOSTAT Statistical Database. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/faostat Ghaley B B, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Hogh-Jensen H and Jensen E S. 2018. Intercropping of wheat and pea for improved resource use efficiency and crop productivity. Field Crops Research 231: 23–30.
Gomez K A and Gomez A A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons.
ICAR-IIWBR. 2023. Vision 2050. Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, Haryana. https://iiwbr.icar.gov.in Jackson M L. 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis-Advanced Course:
A Manual of Methods Useful for Instruction and Research in Soil Chemistry, Physical Chemistry of Soils, Soil Fertility, and Soil Genesis. Madison, Wisconsin.
Jain N K and Dahama A K. 2007. Effect of phosphorus and zinc on yield, nutrient uptake and quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 77(5): 310–13.
Jat H S, Sharma P C and Kumar V. 2023. Diversified cropping systems for sustainable intensification in the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Field Crops Research 295: 108901.
Karak P K, Chakraborty S, Pariari A and Karak C. 2018. Effect of growth regulators on growth, yield and quality of chilli in saline belt of West Bengal. Research on Crops 19(2): 249–53.
Khan N, Siddiqui M H, Ahmad S, Ahmad M M and Siddiqui S. 2024. New insights in enhancing the phosphorus use efficiency using phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms and their role in cropping system. Geomicrobiology Journal 41(5): 485–95.
Kumar A, Singh R and Singh N. 2021. Biofertilisers as sustainable tools for improving soil fertility and crop productivity. Environment, Development and Sustainability 23: 12000–19.
Kumar A, Yadav S K and Meena R S. 2023. Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria for sustainable agriculture: Mechanisms and field potential. Rhizosphere 26: 100651.
Li C, Hoffland E, Kuyper T W, Yu Y, Zhang C, Li H, Zhang F and van der Werf W. 2020. Syndromes of production in intercropping impact yield gains. Nature Plants 6: 653–60.
Li L, Li S M, Sun J H, Zhou L L, Bao X G, Zhang H G and Zhang F S. 2018. Diversity enhances agricultural productivity via rhizosphere phosphorus facilitation on phosphorus-deficient soils. (In) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115(18): 5191–96.
Li L, Tilman D, Lambers H and Zhang F S. 2014. Plant diversity and overyielding: Insights from below ground facilitation of intercropping in agriculture. New Phytologist 203: 63–69.
Meena V S, Maurya B R, Verma J P and Meena R S. 2022. Role of phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms for sustainable agriculture: A review. Environmental Sustainability 5: 1–15.
Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers' Welfare. 2023. Agricultural Statistics at a Glance. Government of India. https://agricoop. nic.in
Niu Y F, Chai R S, Jin G L, Wang H, Tang C X and Zhang Y S. 2013. Responses of root architecture development to low phosphorus availability: A review. Annals of Botany 112(2): 391–408.
Olsen S R, Cole C V, Watanabe F S and Dean L A. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circular 939.
O’Connell M G, O’Leary G J, Whitfield D M and Connor D J. 2004. Interception of photosynthetically active radiation and radiation-use efficiency of wheat, field pea and mustard in a semi-arid environment. Field Crops Research 85(2–3): 111–24.
Raza A, Razzaq A, Mehmood S S, Zou X, Zhang X, Lv Y and Xu J. 2021. Impact of climate change on crops adaptation and strategies to tackle its outcome: A review. Plants 10: 248.
Sahu A, Pandey V C and Singh N. 2021. Role of microbial phosphorus biofertilisers in soil fertility and crop productivity under acidic soils. Land Degradation and Development 32(7): 2263–73.
Sharma S K, Kumar A and Srivastava P C. 2020. Phosphorus management in Indian agriculture: Challenges and strategies. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 19(3): 267–75.
Sharma S N, Prasad R, Dwivedi M K and Kumar S. 2009. Effect of residue and rates and sources of phosphorus application on growth, yield and economics of wheat (Triticum aestivum). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 79(10).
Singh R, Choudhary A K and Meena R S. 2022. Advances in intercropping systems for sustainable intensification. Agronomy 12(3): 689.
Singh U and Ahlawat I P S. 2006. Productivity, nutrient uptake and soil fertility as influenced by phosphorus management in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 76(9).
Srivastava R K, Patel D A, Saravaiya S N and Chaudhari P P. 2008. Intercropping of wheat and mustard-A review. Agricultural Reviews 29(3): 167–76.
Subbaiah B V and Asija G L. 1956. A rapid procedure for estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Current Science 25: 259–60.
Zhang H, Wang X, Wang Z, Cui L and Xia Y. 2021. Intercropping improves leaf area index and radiation use efficiency in maize-wheat relay strip systems. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 310: 108624.
Zhou J, Liu Y, Wang J, Yu H and Luo Y. 2023. Biofertilisers improve phosphorus availability and uptake in wheat under field conditions. Field Crops Research 293: 108880.
Zhou Y, Chen Y, Liu H, Zhang C and Wang J. 2023. Optimizing crop growth rate and yield through intercropping: Insights from grain and biomass partitioning. Field Crops Research 295: 108899.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.