Effect of conjoint use of conventional and nano-fertilisers on Ethiopianmustard (Brassica carinata) in north-western Himalayas
126 / 59
Keywords:
Benefit: cost ratio, Gross returns, Nano-DAP, Nano urea, YieldAbstract
The present experiment was conducted to study the effect of conventional and nano-fertilisers on growth, yield attributes and yield of Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata A. Brown) (variety Jayanti) in north-western Himalayas during winter (rabi) season of 2023–24 and 2024–25 at Shivalik Agricultural Research and Extension Centre, Kangra, Himachal Pradesh. The experiment was laid out in a factorial randomised block design (F-RBD) involving three levels of RD-NP (Recommended dose of nitrogen and phosphorus), viz. 100%, 75% and 50% RD-NP and three sprays of nano-fertilisers, viz. two-sprays of nano-urea @4 mL/L at 25 and 45 DAS (days after sowing), two sprays of nano-DAP @4 mL/L at 25 and 45 DAS, and two sprays of nano-urea + nano-DAP (4 mL/L each) at 25 and 45 DAS, and one absolute control (water spray). The pooled analysis recorded that 100% RD-NP had significantly higher values of plant height, number of primary and secondary branches/plant, siliquae/plant, seeds/siliqua, seed yield and biological yield as compared to the treatments 75% RD-NP and 50% RD-NP. Among nano-fertilisers, two sprays of nano-urea + nano-DAP @4 mL/L (each) recorded higher values of plant height, number of primary and secondary branches/plant, siliquae/plant, seeds/siliqua, seed yield and biological yield than their individual application. The results indicated that foliar sprays of nano-fertilisers showed positive influence on growth, yield attributes and yield in Ethiopian mustard. Thus, two spray of nano-urea + nano-DAP @4 mL/L each at 25 and 45 DAS with application of 60 kg N, 40 kg P2O5 and 40 kg K2O/ha may be advisable in mid-hills of north-western Himalayas.
Downloads
References
Akhtar N, Ilyas N, Meraj T A, Pour-Aboughadareh A, Sayyed R Z, Mashwani Z U R and Poczai P. 2022. Improvement of plant responses by nanobiofertiliser: A step towards sustainable agriculture. Nanomaterials 12(6): 965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12060965
Anonymous. 2024. Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2024–25. Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India. https://desagri.gov.in/india
Anushka A S, Kumar G S, Sritharan N, Radhamani S and Maragatham S. 2022. Studies on the effect of nano-urea on growth, yield and nutrient use efficiency in transplanted rice. International Journal of Environment Climate Change 13(10): 1547–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i102810
Babu S, Singh R, Yadav D, Rathor S S, Raj R and Avasthe R. 2022. Nano fertilisers for agricultural and environmental sustainability. Chemosphere 292: 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133451
Baghla D and Sharma V. 2023. Impact of foliar application of bio-nano P and K and their conventional sources on the yield of maize and wheat in an acid Alfisol. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 49(1): 55–61.
Bhargavi S and Sundari M. 2023. Influence of nano fertilisers on growth parameters and leaf chlorophyll content in mustard. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 22(3): 301–09.
Bhedela S J, Chhodavadia S K, Zalavadiya R K, Solanki D H and Usadadiya B R. 2024. Effect of foliar application of nano urea on growth parameters, yield attributes and yield of mustard (Brassica juncea L.). International Journal of Research in Agronomy 7(8): 432–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33545/2618060X.2024.v7.i8Sf.1289
Choudhary R, Kumar A and Verma N. 2023. Role of nano urea in enhancing micronutrient uptake in oilseed crops. Indian Journal of Plant Nutrition 8(4): 221–29.
Chudasama S D, Usadadia V P, Kaswala A R, Patel K K, Chaudhary B J and Shiyal V N. 2024. Influence of liquid nano-urea fertiliser on growth and yield of summer rice (Oryza sativa L.) under south Gujarat conditions. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 14(6): 355–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i64235
Cochran W G and Cox G M. 1957. Experimental Designs. Wiley, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-195711000-00018
Damor R I, Desai C K and Desai J S. 2024. Effect of nano urea on growth and yield of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Journal of Oilseed Brassica 15(1): 134–37.
Goud G M K, Sudhakar K S, Pasha M L and Madhavi A. 2022. Evaluation of the foliar application of nano urea on the performance of rabi sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 12(11): 2700–06. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2022/v12i1131258
Jangir N, Suman, Saxena S, Yadav S and Nishikant. 2021. Nano urea: Environment friendly and better substitute for urea. Just Agriculture 2: 34–37.
Kumar Y, Tiwari K N, Singh T and Raliya R. 2021. Nano fertilisers and their role in sustainable agriculture. Annals of Plant and Soil Research 23: 238–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47815/apsr.2021.10067
Mankotia B S and Sharma H L. 1997. Yield attributes and yield of gobhi sarson (Brassica napus ssp. oleifera) and toria (B. rapa) under different levels of nitrogen, phosphorus and farmyard manure in mid-hills of north-western Himalayas. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 67(3): 106–09.
Mankotia B S and Sharma H L. 1998. Response of gobhi sarson (Brassica napus) and toria to N, P, FYM and their residual effect on maize. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 43(4): 596–99.
Mukherjee A, Maity A, Pramanik P, Shubha K, Joshi D C and Wani S H. 2019. Public perception about use of nanotechnology in griculture. (In) Advances in Phytonanotechnology, pp. 405–18. Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815322-2.00019-5
Navya K, Kumar R, Chaitanya K and Sampath O. 2022. Effect of nano nitrogen in conjunction with urea on growth and yield of mustard (Brassica juncea L.) in northern Telangana zone. Biological Forum-An International Journal 14(3): 95–99.
Pandav D M, Talathi M S, Bodake P S, Chavan V G, More S S, Pethe U B, Rajemahadik V A, Ghodake S S and Mote G K. 2022. Response of nitrogen level and nano urea on mustard (Brassica juncea L.) under Konkan condition. The Pharma Innovation Journal 11(12): 2055–61.
Pramanik S C, Singh N P, Singh S and Gamayak L M. 1996. Irrigation and nitrogen effects on oil yield and nitrogen uptake by Ethiopian mustard. Indian Journal of Agronomy 41(1): 101–07.
Rathore S S, Singh R K, Shekhawat K, Upadhyay P K, Shekhawat R and Premi O P. 2019. Effect of nano particles on growth, productivity, profitability of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) under semi-arid conditions. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 89: 1145–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i7.91669
Sarkar S, Kumar R, Sharma V. 2024. Green leaf development and biomass enhancement through nano-urea in Brassica juncea. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 12(1): 51–59.
Sharma R, Manuja S, Kumar N, Sharma R P, Saharan S, Sharma T and Rana B B. 2023. Effect of foliar spray of nano nitrogen and nano zinc on growth, development, yield and economics of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 49(1): 12–20.
Shilpa, Singh J, Manuja S, Kumar P and Pooja. 2022. Influence of tillage practices and nutrients sources on growth parameters and their correlation with yield of mustard. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 48(2): 175–80.
Singh A K, Singh H, Rai O P, Singh G, Singh V P, Singh N P and Singh R. 2017. Effect of sowing dates and varieties for higher productivity of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Journal of Applied and Natural Science 9(2): 883–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v9i2.1292
Tomar A, Negi M S, Ardeep and Chilwal A. 2018. Response of Indian mustard cultivar RH 749 to different fertility levels under tarai conditions of Uttarakhand. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 7(4): 2111–13.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.