Effect of conjoint use of conventional and nano-fertilisers on Ethiopianmustard (Brassica carinata) in north-western Himalayas


126 / 59

Authors

  • ANSHUL KUMAR College of Agriculture, Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, Himanchal Pradesh 176 062, India image/svg+xml
  • B S MANKOTIA Shivalik Agricultural Research and Extension Centre (CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya), Kangra, Himachal Pradesh 176 001, India image/svg+xml
  • NITIN BAJYA Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidylaya, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh 176 062, India image/svg+xml
  • DEERAJ SAIN Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidylaya, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh 176 062, India image/svg+xml

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v96i5.171967

Keywords:

Benefit: cost ratio, Gross returns, Nano-DAP, Nano urea, Yield

Abstract

The present experiment was conducted to study the effect of conventional and nano-fertilisers on growth, yield attributes and yield of Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata A. Brown) (variety Jayanti) in north-western Himalayas during winter (rabi) season of 2023–24 and 2024–25 at Shivalik Agricultural Research and Extension Centre, Kangra, Himachal Pradesh. The experiment was laid out in a factorial randomised block design (F-RBD) involving three levels of RD-NP (Recommended dose of nitrogen and phosphorus), viz. 100%, 75% and 50% RD-NP and three sprays of nano-fertilisers, viz. two-sprays of nano-urea @4 mL/L at 25 and 45 DAS (days after sowing), two sprays of nano-DAP @4 mL/L at 25 and 45 DAS, and two sprays of nano-urea + nano-DAP (4 mL/L each) at 25 and 45 DAS, and one absolute control (water spray). The pooled analysis recorded that 100% RD-NP had significantly higher values of plant height, number of primary and secondary branches/plant, siliquae/plant, seeds/siliqua, seed yield and biological yield as compared to the treatments 75% RD-NP and 50% RD-NP. Among nano-fertilisers, two sprays of nano-urea + nano-DAP @4 mL/L (each) recorded higher values of plant height, number of primary and secondary branches/plant, siliquae/plant, seeds/siliqua, seed yield and biological yield than their individual application. The results indicated that foliar sprays of nano-fertilisers showed positive influence on growth, yield attributes and yield in Ethiopian mustard. Thus, two spray of nano-urea + nano-DAP @4 mL/L each at 25 and 45 DAS with application of 60 kg N, 40 kg P2O5 and 40 kg K2O/ha may be advisable in mid-hills of north-western Himalayas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akhtar N, Ilyas N, Meraj T A, Pour-Aboughadareh A, Sayyed R Z, Mashwani Z U R and Poczai P. 2022. Improvement of plant responses by nanobiofertiliser: A step towards sustainable agriculture. Nanomaterials 12(6): 965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12060965

Anonymous. 2024. Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2024–25. Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India. https://desagri.gov.in/india

Anushka A S, Kumar G S, Sritharan N, Radhamani S and Maragatham S. 2022. Studies on the effect of nano-urea on growth, yield and nutrient use efficiency in transplanted rice. International Journal of Environment Climate Change 13(10): 1547–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i102810

Babu S, Singh R, Yadav D, Rathor S S, Raj R and Avasthe R. 2022. Nano fertilisers for agricultural and environmental sustainability. Chemosphere 292: 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133451

Baghla D and Sharma V. 2023. Impact of foliar application of bio-nano P and K and their conventional sources on the yield of maize and wheat in an acid Alfisol. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 49(1): 55–61.

Bhargavi S and Sundari M. 2023. Influence of nano fertilisers on growth parameters and leaf chlorophyll content in mustard. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 22(3): 301–09.

Bhedela S J, Chhodavadia S K, Zalavadiya R K, Solanki D H and Usadadiya B R. 2024. Effect of foliar application of nano urea on growth parameters, yield attributes and yield of mustard (Brassica juncea L.). International Journal of Research in Agronomy 7(8): 432–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33545/2618060X.2024.v7.i8Sf.1289

Choudhary R, Kumar A and Verma N. 2023. Role of nano urea in enhancing micronutrient uptake in oilseed crops. Indian Journal of Plant Nutrition 8(4): 221–29.

Chudasama S D, Usadadia V P, Kaswala A R, Patel K K, Chaudhary B J and Shiyal V N. 2024. Influence of liquid nano-urea fertiliser on growth and yield of summer rice (Oryza sativa L.) under south Gujarat conditions. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 14(6): 355–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i64235

Cochran W G and Cox G M. 1957. Experimental Designs. Wiley, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-195711000-00018

Damor R I, Desai C K and Desai J S. 2024. Effect of nano urea on growth and yield of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Journal of Oilseed Brassica 15(1): 134–37.

Goud G M K, Sudhakar K S, Pasha M L and Madhavi A. 2022. Evaluation of the foliar application of nano urea on the performance of rabi sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 12(11): 2700–06. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2022/v12i1131258

Jangir N, Suman, Saxena S, Yadav S and Nishikant. 2021. Nano urea: Environment friendly and better substitute for urea. Just Agriculture 2: 34–37.

Kumar Y, Tiwari K N, Singh T and Raliya R. 2021. Nano fertilisers and their role in sustainable agriculture. Annals of Plant and Soil Research 23: 238–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47815/apsr.2021.10067

Mankotia B S and Sharma H L. 1997. Yield attributes and yield of gobhi sarson (Brassica napus ssp. oleifera) and toria (B. rapa) under different levels of nitrogen, phosphorus and farmyard manure in mid-hills of north-western Himalayas. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 67(3): 106–09.

Mankotia B S and Sharma H L. 1998. Response of gobhi sarson (Brassica napus) and toria to N, P, FYM and their residual effect on maize. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 43(4): 596–99.

Mukherjee A, Maity A, Pramanik P, Shubha K, Joshi D C and Wani S H. 2019. Public perception about use of nanotechnology in griculture. (In) Advances in Phytonanotechnology, pp. 405–18. Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815322-2.00019-5

Navya K, Kumar R, Chaitanya K and Sampath O. 2022. Effect of nano nitrogen in conjunction with urea on growth and yield of mustard (Brassica juncea L.) in northern Telangana zone. Biological Forum-An International Journal 14(3): 95–99.

Pandav D M, Talathi M S, Bodake P S, Chavan V G, More S S, Pethe U B, Rajemahadik V A, Ghodake S S and Mote G K. 2022. Response of nitrogen level and nano urea on mustard (Brassica juncea L.) under Konkan condition. The Pharma Innovation Journal 11(12): 2055–61.

Pramanik S C, Singh N P, Singh S and Gamayak L M. 1996. Irrigation and nitrogen effects on oil yield and nitrogen uptake by Ethiopian mustard. Indian Journal of Agronomy 41(1): 101–07.

Rathore S S, Singh R K, Shekhawat K, Upadhyay P K, Shekhawat R and Premi O P. 2019. Effect of nano particles on growth, productivity, profitability of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) under semi-arid conditions. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 89: 1145–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i7.91669

Sarkar S, Kumar R, Sharma V. 2024. Green leaf development and biomass enhancement through nano-urea in Brassica juncea. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 12(1): 51–59.

Sharma R, Manuja S, Kumar N, Sharma R P, Saharan S, Sharma T and Rana B B. 2023. Effect of foliar spray of nano nitrogen and nano zinc on growth, development, yield and economics of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 49(1): 12–20.

Shilpa, Singh J, Manuja S, Kumar P and Pooja. 2022. Influence of tillage practices and nutrients sources on growth parameters and their correlation with yield of mustard. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 48(2): 175–80.

Singh A K, Singh H, Rai O P, Singh G, Singh V P, Singh N P and Singh R. 2017. Effect of sowing dates and varieties for higher productivity of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Journal of Applied and Natural Science 9(2): 883–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v9i2.1292

Tomar A, Negi M S, Ardeep and Chilwal A. 2018. Response of Indian mustard cultivar RH 749 to different fertility levels under tarai conditions of Uttarakhand. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 7(4): 2111–13.

Downloads

Submitted

2025-09-22

Published

2026-05-05

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

KUMAR, A., MANKOTIA, B. S., BAJYA, N. ., & SAIN, D. . (2026). Effect of conjoint use of conventional and nano-fertilisers on Ethiopianmustard (Brassica carinata) in north-western Himalayas. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 96(5), 631–636. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v96i5.171967
Citation