Synergistic effects of herbicide and nano-fertiliser on weed control, productivity and economics of wheat (Triticum aestivum)


166 / 69

Authors

  • DURGESH K PATIDAR ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh 482 004, India image/svg+xml
  • V K CHOUDHARY ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh 482 004, India image/svg+xml
  • J S MISHRA ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh 482 004, India image/svg+xml

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v96i7.172810

Keywords:

Herbicide compatibility, Nano urea, NDVI, Weed control efficiency

Abstract

Weeds pose a major constraint to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production and herbicides has been one of the most effective and economical tools for weed management. Meanwhile, the use of nano-fertilisers is gaining traction due to their efficiency and are often applied as top dressing at the same time as post-emergence herbicides. The compatibility between herbicides and nano-fertilisers and their combined impact on weed control and crop performance needs to be understood. Hence, the present study was carried out to evaluate the compatibility of three post-emergence herbicides at recommended doses with nano-fertilisers (nano-urea and nano-DAP, both individually and in combination) in wheat. Wheat variety ‘GW-322’ was selected for the study during the winter (rabi) season of 2023–24 and 2024–25 at ICAR- Directorate of Weed Research, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh. Clodinafop + metsulfuron (60 + 4 g ai/ha) combined with nano urea (4 mL/L) (T6) proved to be most effective, recording the lowest weed density, weed biomass, highest weed control efficiency (94.15%), lowest weed index and normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) (0.377) between the rows. This treatment also significantly improved wheat growth parameters including plant height, tillers/m², dry matter accumulation, leaf area index, crop growth rate, relative growth rate and net assimilation rate as well as yield attributes such as effective tillers, spike length and weight, grains/spike and test weight. The highest wheat grain yield and straw yield, net returns and benefit cost ratio (3.32) were also recorded with T6 and were comparable with those recorded with other treatments involving metsulfuron and mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron with nano-urea. Mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron (12 + 2.4 g/ha), applied alone, caused phytotoxicity up to level 3, which was mitigated when used in combination with nano-urea, enabling faster crop recovery.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbas T, Nadeem M A, Tanveer A, Matloob A, Zohaib A, Ehsan M and Nasir I R. 2015. Herbicide mixtures and row spacing effects on fenoxaprop resistant Phalaris minor in wheat. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 20(12): 2737–44. DOI: 10.17957/IJAB/15.0828

Asif M, Poonia T M, Hooda V S, Pradhan D D and Bhavesh. 2023. Effects of herbicides and nano urea mixture on weeds, yield attributes and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum). International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 13(12): 1211–20. DOI: 10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i123785 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i123785

Bhullar M S, Chauhan B S and Jennings K M. 2020. Management of weeds in wheat. Crop Protection 138: 105–329.

Choudhary A K, Yadav D S, Sood P, Rahi S, Arya K, Thakur S K, Lal R, Kumar S, Sharma J, Dass A, Babu S, Bana R S, Rana D S, Kumar A, Rajpoot S K, Gupta G, Kumar A, M N H, Noorzai A U, Rajanna G A, Khan M H, Dua V K and Singh R. 2021. Post-emergence herbicides for effective weed management, enhanced wheat productivity, profitability and quality in north-western Himalayas: A ‘participatory-mode’ technology development and dissemination. Sustainability 13: 5425. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105425

Choudhary M K, Intodia S K, Kaushik M K, Saharan V, Singh D P, Lakhawat S S and Choudhary M. 2023. Effect of nano urea on growth indices and grain yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under southern Rajasthan conditions. Biological Forum-An International Journal 15(8a): 326–31.

DA&FW. 2024. Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2023–24. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India. https://agriwelfare. gov.in/en/Agricultural_Statistics_at_a_Glance

Deshmukh J P, Kakade S U and Goud V V. 2023. Tillage and weed management effect on wheat in inceptisols grown under soybean-wheat cropping sequence. Indian Journal of Weed Science 55(4): 448–52. DOI: 10.5958/0974-8164.2023.00081.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2023.00081.3

FAO. 2022. FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organisation [FAO] of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data.

Gomez K A and Gomez A A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

Jasrotia P, Kashyap P L, Bhardwaj A K, Kumar S and Singh G P. 2018. Scope and applications of nanotechnology for wheat production: A review of recent advances. Wheat and Barley Research 10(1): 1–14. DOI: 10.25174/2249-4065/2018/76672 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25174/2249-4065/2018/76672

Malik R S, Yadav A and Kumar R. 2013 Ready-mix formulation of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl against complex weed flora in wheat. Indian Journal of Weed Science 45(3): 179–82.

Mishra B K and Singh P C. 2024. Application and effects of different herbicides against weed flora in wheat crop for sustainable agriculture. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International 46(5): 282–86. DOI: 10.9734/jeai/2024/v46i52376 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2024/v46i52376

Mitra B, Barman R and Mondal T. 2019. Control of broad-leaved weeds in wheat under eastern sub-Himalayan plains. Indian Journal of Weed Science 51(1): 27–31. DOI: 10.5958/0974- 8164.2019.00006.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2019.00006.6

Patel V K, Pathak R K, Singh A, Kumar D, Samiksha, Kumar A, dev A, Pathak V and Shukla G. 2020. The effect of tillage and weed management practices on yield and nutrient uptake in wheat (Triticum aestivum L). International Journal of Chemical Studies 8(2): 1429–33. https://www.doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i2v.8965 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i2v.8965

Sarita, Singh I, Mehriya M L and Samota M K. 2022. A study of wheat-weed response and economical analysis to fertilisation and post-emergence herbicides under arid climatic conditions. Frontiers in Agronomy 4: 914091. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fagro.2022.914091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2022.914091

Sarkar A, Singh T, Mondal A, Kumar S, Das T K, Kaur R, Raj R, Upadhyay P K and Sarkar S. 2023. Effect of nano-urea and herbicides on yield and yield attributes of wheat (Triticum aestivum). Indian Journal of Agronomy 68(1): 97–100. https:// doi.org/10.59797/ija.v68i1.211 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v68i1.211

Downloads

Published

2026-07-02

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

PATIDAR, D. K. ., CHOUDHARY, V. K. ., & MISHRA, J. S. . (2026). Synergistic effects of herbicide and nano-fertiliser on weed control, productivity and economics of wheat (Triticum aestivum). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 96(7), 954–960. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v96i7.172810
Citation