Comparative Evaluation of Rescuegrass (Bromus catharticus) Lines for Forage Yield and Quality under Mediterranean Climate Conditions


60

Authors

  • Hasan Beytullah Donmez Faculty of Agriculture, Cukurova University, Balcali Campus, Saricam, Adana 013 30, Türkiye

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v96i4.174554

Keywords:

Agronomic performance, Genetic variation, Nutritive value, Cool-season grass

Abstract

Developing high-yielding and quality forage crops adapted to mediterranean conditions is essential to meet the increasing feed demand in the region. This research was conducted to determine the yield and quality of seven rescuegrass (Bromus catharticus Vahl.) breeding lines developed by selection breeding from 2020 to 2022 under mediterranean climatic conditions in Adana, Turkiye. The experiment was conducted in a randomised complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. Significant effects of year, line and year × line interactions were observed for most traits (P<0.05). Plant height increased from 76.1 cm (establishment year) to 111.4 cm (second year), while tiller number rose from 8.0 to 19.3 per plant. Line 17 exhibited the highest fresh forage yield (19.9 t/ha) and dry matter yield (6.8 t/ha) in the second year, significantly outperforming other lines. Forage quality analysis revealed that Lines 13 and 14 showed superior nutritional value, with crude protein contents of 13.68% and 13.92%, respectively, and lower fiber fractions. Acid detergent fiber ranged from 41.99% (Line 13) to 45.08% (Line 17), while relative feed value varied between 62.3 and 69.3. Strong negative correlations were observed between yield and quality parameters (r = -0.90 to -0.94, P<0.001), indicating a typical yield-quality trade-off in forage breeding. These results demonstrate substantial genetic variation among rescuegrass lines and identify Line 17 for high-yield breeding objectives and Line 13 for quality-focused programs adapted to mediterranean conditions. Future studies should focus on multi-location trials and molecular characterisation to develop improved rescuegrass cultivars for mediterranean conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbott L, Filippini S, Delfino H and Pistorale S. 2012. Stability analysis of forage production in Bromus catharticus (prairie grass) using three methodologies. Ciencia e Investigación Agraria 39(2): 331–38.

Alcicek A. 2021. Calculation of Türkiye's roughage requirements. (In) Workshop on Roughage Problems and Solutions in Turkish Animal Husbandry, pp 67–79. Muş Alparslan University.

Anonymous. 2019. Technical Instructions for Testing the Agricultural Value of Grass Forage Crops. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry General Directorate of Plant Production.

Anonymous. 2023. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Environment, Urbanization and Climate Change Meteorological Data Information Presentation and Sales System. https://mevbis.mgm.gov.tr/mevbis/ui/index.html#/Workspace (Accessed 7 January 2023)

Barre P, Turner L B and Escobar-Gutiérrez A J. 2015. Leaf length variation in perennial forage grasses. Agriculture 5(3): 682–96.

Belesky D P and Fedders J M. 1994. Defoliation effects on seasonal production and growth rate of cool-season grasses. Agronomy Journal 86(1): 38–45.

Belesky D P, Neel J P S and Ruckle J M. 2006a. Prairiegrass–Brassica hybrid swards for autumn dry matter production. Agronomy Journal 98: 1227–35.

Belesky D P, Chatterton N J and Neel J P S. 2006b. Dactylis glomerata growing along a light gradient in the central appalachian region of the eastern USA: III. Nonstructural carbohydrates and nutritive value. Agroforestry Systems 67: 51–61.

Belesky D P, Ruckle J M and Abaye A O. 2007. Seasonal distribution of herbage mass and nutritive value of Prairiegrass (Bromus catharticus Vahl). Grass and Forage Science 62(3): 301–11.

Buxton D R and Lentz E M. 1993. Performance of morphologically diverse orchardgrass clones in spaced and sward plantings. Grass and Forage Science 48(4): 336–46.

Buxton D R. 1995. Growing quality forages under variable environmental conditions. (In) 13th Annual Western Canadian Dairy Seminar (WCDS), Red Deer, Canada, pp 123–34.

Casler M D, Undersander D J, Fredericks C, Combs D K and Reed J D. 1998. An on-farm test of perennial forage grass varieties under management intensive grazing. Journal of Production Agriculture 11(1): 92–99.

Casler M D and Vogel K P. 1999. Accomplishments and impact from breeding for increased forage nutritional value. Crop Science 39(1): 12–20.

Demiroglu Topcu G, Ozkan S S and Basmacioglu Malayoglu H. 2024. Effect of different plant density on the forage yield and some forage quality characteristics of moringa (Moringa oleifera Lam.). Turkish Journal of Field Crops 29(2): 140–48.

Gomez-Miranda A, Plata-Reyes D A, Lopez-Gonzalez F, Dominguez-Vara I A, Morales-Almaraz E and Arriaga-Jordan C M. 2021. Matua bromegrass (Bromus catharticus) as a pasture resource for small-scale dairy systems in the highlands of central Mexico. Journal of Livestock Science 12: 132–40.

Hall M H, Jung G A, Shaffer J A and Everhart J R. 1996. Fall harvest management effects on 'Grasslands Matua' prairie grass quality. Agronomy Journal 88(6): 971–75.

Hatipoglu R, Serbester U, Avci M and Donmez H B. 2020. Present status and development possibilities of forage production in Adana province. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology 8(7): 1497–501.

Jatimliansky J R, Gimenez D O and Bujan A. 1997. Herbage yield, tiller number and root system activity after defoliation of prairie grass (Bromus catharticus Vahl). Grass and Forage Science 52(1): 52–62.

Jefferson P G, Lyons G, Pastl R and Zentner R P. 2005. Companion crop establishment of short-lived perennial forage crops in Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 85(1): 135–46.

Jung G A, Shaffer J A and Everhart J R. 1994. Fall management effects on Grasslands Matua' prairie grass production and sward characteristics. Agronomy Journal 86(6): 1032–39.

Lauriault L M, Kirksey R E and VanLeeuwen D M. 2005. Performance of perennial cool-season forage grasses in diverse soil moisture environments, Southern High Plains, USA. Crop Science 45: 909–15.

Linn J G and Martin N P. 1989. Forage quality tests and interpretation (Revised 1989). https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/207442/MN2500_AGFO_2637_revised1989.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (Accessed 25 May 2023)

Matthew C, Assuero S G, Black C K and Sackville Hamilton N R. 1999. Tiller dynamics of grazed swards. (In) International Symposium on Grassland Ecophysiology and Grazing Ecology, Curitiba, Brazil, pp 109–33.

Miller D A. 1984. Forage Crops. Mc Graw-Hill Book Company, USA.

Minson D J. 1990. Forage in Ruminant Nutrition, 3rd edn. Academic Press, INC, USA.

Moore J E and Undersander D J. 2002. Relative forage quality: An alternative to relative feed value and quality index. (In) Proceedings of the 13th Annual Florida Ruminant Nutrition Symposium, University of Florida, pp 16–32.

NRC. 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington.

Olivoto T and Lúcio A D C. 2020. metan: An R package for multi-environment trial analysis. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 11(6): 783–89.

Ozduven L, Okuyucu B and Tuna M. 2021. A preliminary study on the effect of hay yield and feed values of some rescue grass (Bromus catharticus Vahl) lines harvested in different maturity stages. Journal of Animal Production 62(2): 137–46.

Putnam D H and Orloff S. 2016. Agronomic factors affecting forage quality in alfalfa. (In) California Alfalfa & Forage Symposium, UC Cooperative Extension, pp 1–14.

R Core Team. 2024. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.r-project.org/ (Accessed 2 December 2024)

Rohweder D A, Barnes R F and Jorgensen N. 1978. Proposed hay grading standards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality. Journal of Animal Science 47(3): 747–59.

Rumball W and Miller J E. 2003. Grasslands dixon' prairie grass (Bromus catharticus vahl.). New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 46(1): 65–66.

Sanderson M A, Skinner R H and Elwinger G F. 2002. Seedling development and field performance of prairiegrass, grazing bromegrass, and orchardgrass. Crop Science 42(1): 224–30.

Sayar M S. 2014. Path coefficient and correlation analysis between forage yield and its affecting components in common vetch (Vicia sativa L.). Legume Research 37(5): 445–52.

Scheneiter O and Rosso B. 2005. Herbage accumulation and tiller dynamics of prairie grass germplasm (Bromus catharticus VHAL.) in mixture with lucerne (Medicago sativa L.). Revista de Investigaciones Agropecuarias 34(2): 109–21.

Scheneiter O, Matthew C and Rimieri P. 2008. The effect of defoliation management on tiller dynamics of prairie grass. Revista Argentina de Produccion Animal 28(1): 7–20.

Sleugh B, Moore K J, George J R and Brummer E C. 2000. Binary legume-grass mixtures improve forage yield, quality, and seasonal distribution. Agronomy Journal 92(1): 24–29.

Steel R G D, Torrie J H and Dickey D A. 1997. Principles and Procedures of Statistics A Biometrical Approach, 3rd edn. WCB/McGraw-Hill, New York.

Stewart A V. 1996. Potential value of some Bromus species of the section Ceratochloa. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 39(4): 611–18.

Turner L R, Donaghy D J, Lane P A and Rawnsley R P. 2006. Effect of defoliation management, based on leaf stage, on perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.), prairie grass (Bromus willdenowii Kunth.) and cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) under dryland conditions. 2. Nutritive value. Grass and Forage Science 61(2): 175–81.

Turner L R, Donaghy D J, Lane P A and Rawnsley R P. 2007. Patterns of leaf and root regrowth, and allocation of water-soluble carbohydrate reserves following defoliation of plants of prairie grass (Bromus willdenowii Kunth.). Grass and Forage Science 62(4): 497–506.

Van Soest P J. 1963. Use of Detergents in the Analysis of Fibrous Feeds. II. A Rapid Method for the Determination of Fiber and Lignin. Journal of Association of Official Agricultural Chemists 46(5): 829–35.

Van Soest P J, Robertson J B and Lewis B A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74(10): 3583–97.

Van Soest P J. 1994. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. Cornell University Press, New York.

Wang X, Wang J, Li E C, Guo Y and Li W. 2025. Plant height is the main factor driving forage yield of Poa species under different row spacings and seeding rates in the Qilian Mountains. Frontiers in Plant Science 16(1535937).

Xia J X, Hodgson J and Chu A C P. 1994. Effects of severity of grazing on tissue turnover in matua prairie grass dairy pasture. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 37(1): 41–50.

Yuan X, Li S, Chen J, Yu H, Yang T, Wang C, Huang S, Chen H and Ao X. 2024. Impacts of global climate change on agricultural production: A Comprehensive review. Agronomy 14(1360).

Submitted

2025-12-25

Published

2026-04-10

How to Cite

Donmez, H. B. (2026). Comparative Evaluation of Rescuegrass (Bromus catharticus) Lines for Forage Yield and Quality under Mediterranean Climate Conditions. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 96(4). https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v96i4.174554
Citation