Comparative analysis of machine learning and time series models for crop volume prediction: evidence from AGMARKNET data for wheat and maize in India


18

Authors

  • SAI PRABHAKAR BALANTRAPU Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Learning
  • Dr. Raghavender Raju G
  • Satya Sai Mudigonda
  • Lalith Aditya Kalur

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v96i10.179738

Keywords:

AGMARKNET; crop volume prediction; Extra Trees Regressor; machine learning; maize arrivals; Ridge Regression; SARIMA; time series forecasting; wheat arrivals

Abstract

Accurate forecasting of crop market arrivals is essential for agricultural supply chain management, food security planning, and insurance premium design in India. This study presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of eight forecasting models — including six machine learning approaches and two classical time series models — applied to monthly wheat and maize market arrivals data sourced from the Agricultural Marketing Information Network (AGMARKNET) covering April 2008 to March 2025. The wheat dataset encompasses 2,426,543 transaction records spanning 24 states, while the maize dataset covers 1,014,415 records across 26 states. Following standardised preprocessing and monthly aggregation, lag-based feature engineering was applied (lags: 1, 3, 6, 12 months) alongside a seasonality indicator. Models evaluated include Ridge Regression, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, Extra Trees (machine learning category), SARIMA(1,1,1)(1,1,1)₁₂ and SARIMAX with modal price as an exogenous variable (time series category). For wheat, the Extra Trees Regressor achieved the best performance (MAE = 0.448, RMSE = 0.740 million tonnes), outperforming all other models. For maize, Ridge Regression achieved the best performance (MAE = 0.285, RMSE = 0.606 million tonnes). The contrasting best-model selection between the two crops reveals important insights: wheat exhibits strong non-linear seasonal spikes (Rabi harvest, April–May), favouring ensemble tree methods, while maize arrivals exhibit a more gradual, trend-driven pattern amenable to linear regularised regression. The findings contribute to the emerging literature on machine-learning-based agricultural forecasting in India and have direct implications for revenue protection product design, food procurement planning, and price stabilisation policy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Deb C K, Avinash G, Nayak G H H, Singh K N, Alam M W, Ray M and Kumar R. 2024. Exogenous variable driven deep learning models for improved price forecasting of TOP crops in India. Scientific Reports 14: Article 17529.

Ghosh A, Kundu A, G G P and Ghosh Kundu S. 2022. A ML-AI enabled ensemble model for predicting agricultural yield. Cogent Food and Agriculture 8(1): 2085717.

Gill K K, Bhatt K, Akansha, Setiya P, Sandhu S S and Kaur B. 2024. Comparative evaluation of statistical and machine learning models for weather-driven wheat yield forecasting across different districts of Punjab. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 17: Article 381.

Jha G K et al. 2023. Hybrid time series models with exogenous variable for improved forecasting of Rabi crop yields in India. Scientific Reports 13: Article 22020.

Mahto A, Ahmad J, Alam M A, Biswas R and Alam S. 2021. Short-term forecasting of agriculture commodities in context of Indian market for sustainable agriculture by using the artificial neural network. Journal of Food Quality 2021: 9939906.

Pandey K, Sukirti, Danodia A and Karnatak H. 2023. Development of machine learning based models for multivariate prediction of wheat crop yield in Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of Geomatics 17(2): 70.

Pandiyan A M, Raja S P, Nikhil U V and Stamenkovic Z. 2024. Machine learning-based crop yield prediction in South India: Performance analysis of various models. Computers 13(6): 137.

Patil J and Kinger S. 2025. Explainable ensemble learning framework for soybean yield prediction: A data-driven approach for agricultural resilience in India. (In) Proceedings of International Conference on Computing and Communication in Ubiquitous Environments (ICCUbEA) 2025. IEEE.

Paul A K, Gupta A, Roy H S, Balasubramanian M, Yeasin M, Kumar P, Kumar P and Paul R. 2022. Machine learning techniques for forecasting agricultural prices: A case of brinjal in Odisha, India. PLOS ONE 17(7): e0270553.

Paul R, Shankar S and Yeasin M. 2024. Forecasting area and yield of cereal crops in India: Intelligent choices among stochastic, machine learning and deep learning techniques. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43538-024-00345-3

Sebari I, Pilz J, Ait El Kadi K, Meghraoui K and Bensiali S. 2024. Applied deep learning-based crop yield prediction: A systematic analysis of current developments and potential challenges. Technologies 12(4): 43.

Shinyclimensa C and Parthiban A. 2026. Network-enhanced machine learning framework for multi crop yield prediction: A comprehensive analysis of Indian agricultural data. Frontiers in Agronomy 8: 1767878.

Singh P, Singh H K and Kumar B. 2025. Crop yield prediction using machine learning and remote sensing for Western Uttar Pradesh. (In) Proceedings of SMART 2025 Conference. IEEE.

Vashisth A, Das B, Aravind K S and Krishanan P. 2022. Wheat yield prediction based on weather parameters using multiple linear, neural network and penalised regression models. Journal of Agrometeorology 24(1).

Published

2026-10-05

How to Cite

BALANTRAPU, S. P., G, R. R. ., Mudigonda, S. S., & Kalur, L. A. (2026). Comparative analysis of machine learning and time series models for crop volume prediction: evidence from AGMARKNET data for wheat and maize in India. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 96(10). https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v96i10.179738
Citation