Impact of biopesticide formulation on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum): economics and environmental effects
Abstract views: 89 / PDF downloads: 68
https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v82i12.26259
Keywords:
Biopesticide formulation, Cow urine-based indigenous knowledge, EIQ, Pest control, TomatoAbstract
The indigenously prepared biopesticide formulation (BPF) @ 10% proved to be the best for tomato crop with lowest EIQ-field use ratings resulting in least or negligible impact on environment. The lowest economics involved proves its high social acceptance. Therefore there is a need to opt traditional knowledge as essential and alternate component of pest management, not only for tomato crop, but also to all major crops, to reduce the load and impact of synthetic chemical pesticides for safer environment. If any pesticide schedule or plant protection activity is able to reduce economics involved in the programme along with minimum total EIQ-FUR level, it would definitely add value to the standard of living of farmers by making that technology, socially acceptable.
Downloads
References
Arora, Sumitra, Kanojia, Ashok K, Kumar Ashok, Sahu, Vikrant and Mogha Navin. 2012. Bio-pesticide Formulation to control Tomato lepidopteran pest menace. Current Science 102 (7): 1051–7, 10 April 2012.
Badenes-Perez F R and Shelton A M. 2006. Pest management and other agricultural practices among farmers growing cruciferous vegetables in the central and western highlands of Kenya and the western Himalayas of India. International Journal of Pest Management 52 (4): 303–15.
Cross P and Edwards-Jones G. 2006. Variation in pesticide hazard from arable crop production in Great Britain from 1992 to 2002: Pesticide risk indices and policy analysis. Crop Protection 25(10): 1101–8.
Gallivan G J, Berges H and McGee B. 2008. Evaluation of the changes in pesticide risk. research project SR9128: Survey of pesticide use and evaluation of the changes in pesticide risk on agricultural crops in Ontario (2005). http://www.agcare.org/ File.aspx?id=94b98a8e-8ec1-4314-a906-ca5eca7a435e (accessed 11 June 2008).
Greitens T J and Day E. 2006. An alternative way to evaluate the environmental effects of integrated pest management: pesticide risk indicators. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 22 (3): 213–22.
Kanojia A K, Arora, Sumitra and Singh, Ranbir. 2008. An indigenous bio-pesticide enhances tomato yield. ICAR News 14 (1): 6.
Kleter G A, Bhula R, Bodnaruk K, Carazo E, Felsot A S, Harris C A, Katayama A, Kuiper H A, Racke K D, Rubin B, Shevah Y, Stephenson G R, Tanaka K, Unsworth J, Wauchope R D and Wong S. 2007. Altered pesticide use on transgenic crops and the associated general impact from an environmental perspective. Pest Management Science 63: 1107–15.
Kovach J, Petzoldt C, Degni J and Tette J. 1992. A method to measure the environmental impact of pesticides. New York’s Food and Life Sciences Bulletin 139: 1–8.
Kovach J, Petzoldt C, Degni J and Tette J. 2010. A Method to Measure the Environmental Impact of Pesticides. IPM Program, Cornell University, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station Geneva, New York. Dept. Entomology, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Madison Ave., Wooster.
Maud J, Edwards-Jones G and Quin F. 2001. Comparative evaluation of pesticide risk indices for policy development and assessment in the United Kingdom. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 86: 59–73.
Mazlan N and Mumford J. 2005. Insecticide use in cabbage pest management in the Cameron Highlands, Malaysia. Crop Protection 24(1): 31–9.
Morse S, Bennet R and Ismael Y. 2006. Environmental impact of genetically modified cotton in South Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 117: 277–89.
Pandey A Kumar, Namgyal D, Mehdi M, Mir MS, Shikh Bilal Ahmad. 2006. A case study : Major insect pest associated with different vegetable crops in cold arid region Ladakh, of Jammu and Kashmir. Journal of Entomological Research 30: 169–74.
Reddy S G, Swarna, Sharma Debi, Krishna Kumar N K. 2007. Residues of insecticides on sweet pepper and tomat grown under greenhouse and open field cultivation. Pesticide Research Journal 19: 239–43.
Stenrod M, Heggen H E, Bolli R and Eklo O M. 2008. Testing and comparison of three pesticide risk indicator models under Norwegian conditions: A case study in the Skuterud and Heiabekken catchments. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 123: 15–29.
Yardlm E N and Edwards C A. 2003. An economic comparison of pesticide application regimes for processing tomatoes. Phytoparasitica 31 (1): 51–60.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.