Integrated nutrient management in rejuvenated guava (Psidium guajava) orchard under semiarid conditions of Eastern Rajasthan

R K MEENA; L N MAHWER; P L SAROJ; D K SAROLI; H R MEENA; M KANWAT

doi:10.56093/ijas.v84i12.45212

Authors

R K MEENA Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, Rajasthan 313 001
L N MAHWER Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, Rajasthan 313 001
P L SAROJ Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, Rajasthan 313 001
D K SAROLI Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, Rajasthan 313 001
H R MEENA Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, Rajasthan 313 001
M KANWAT Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, Rajasthan 313 001

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v84i12.45212

Keywords:

Biofertilizer, Canopy management, Integrated nutrient management, Psidium guajava, Rejuvenation, Vermicompost

Abstract

An investigation was carried out during 2010-11 to study the effect of integrated nutrients management after rejuvenating more than 25 years old guava orchard planted at 6×6 m apart under semiarid conditions of eastern Rajasthan. The results revealed that almost all treatments with combined application of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients had significantly influenced the plant growth and yield of guava fruits over control (only recommended dose of NPK, i.e. 500: 200: 500 g/plant-T₁). Among different treatments, application of 2/3 of T₁+5 kg Vermicompost+250g Azospirillum+250g Azotobacter/plant (T₁₅) significantly increased the vegetative growth of rejuvenated plants in terms of shoot length (148.99 cm), shoot diameter (11.15 mm), number of leaves per shoot (63.25), mean girth of primary branches (15.8 cm), plant spread E-W (3.96 m), N-S (3.55m), canopy volume (7.109 m3) and also fruit diameter polar and equatorial (6.74 and 6.72 cm) and fruit weight (109.71g fruit) but the flowering behavior, fruit yield and quality parameters of guava fruit were significantly superior with the application of 2/3 of T₁+25 kg FYM+250g Azospirillum+250g Azotobacter/Plant (T₁₁). Further, this treatment (T₁₁) also influenced early flowering as less number of days required for flowering (29.31days), highest number of flowers per shoot (8.13), better fruit set (39.95%), fruit retention (58.50%) and fruit yield (15.03 kg/plant and 4.18 t/ha) in third year of rejuvenation. The fruits harvested under this treatment exhibited best quality traits, which were judged by analyzing TSS (13.93 0B), acidity (0.454%), ascorbic acid (231.21 mg/100 g), TSS:acid ratio (30.77), reducing sugar (4.61%), non-reducing sugar (3.07%) and total sugar (7.29%). Therefore, application of 2/3 quantity of recommended dose of NPK, i.e. 500:200:500 g+25 kg FYM+250g Azospirillum+250g Azotobacter/plant is recommended for harvesting more than 20% higher yield and better quality fruits from rejuvenated guava orchards.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AOAC. 1994. Official Methods of Analysis, 14th edn. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington, USA.

Anonymous. 2009. Rajasthan Horticulture Statistics. Directorate of Horticulture, Pant Krishi Bhawan, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

Athani S I, Prabhuraj H S, Ustad A I, Swamy G S K, Patil P B and Kotikal Y K. 2005. Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers on vegetative growth parameters, fruit characters, quality and yield of ‘Sardar’ guava. (In) 1st International Guava Symposium, 5-8 Dec, CISH, Lucknow, p 70.

Kalloo G, Reddy B M C, Singh G and Lal B. 2005. Rejuvenation of old and senile orchards. Extention Bulletin, CISH, Lucknow, 25, pp 17–20.

Naik M H and Hari Babu R S. 2005. Feasibility of organic farming in guava (Psidium guajava L.). Acta Horticulture 735: 365–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.735.52

Palaniappan S P and Annadurai K. 2000. Organic Farming, Theory and Practice. Scientific Publisher (India), pp 402–4.

Rai M, De P, Gangopadhyay K K, Das B, Nath V, Reddy N N and Singh H P. 2002. Influence of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on growth parameters, leaf nutrient composition and yield of litchi (Litchi chinensis). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 72: 267–70.

Ram R A, Bhriguvanshi S R and Pathak R K. 2005a. Integrated plant nutrient management in guava (Psidium guajava L.) cv. ‘Sardar’. (In) 1st International Guava symposium, 5-8 Dec, CISH, Lucknow, p 85.

Ram R A, Bhriguvanshi S R, Neelima Garg and Pathak R K. 2005b. Studies on organic production of guava (Psidium guajava L.) cv. Allahabad Safeda. Acta Horticulture 735: 373– 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.735.53

Saroj P L, Singh D and Singh A K. 2006. Guava (Psidium guajava). (In) Advances in Arid Horticulture, Vol II. International Book Distributing Company, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh.

Shukla A K, Sarolia D K, Bhavana Kumari, Kaushik R A, Mahawer L N and Bairwa H L. 2009. Evaluation of substrate dynamics for integrated nutrient management under high density planting of guava cv. Sardar. Indian Journal of Horticulture 66: 461–4.

Singh G, Mishra R and Sigh G P. 2005. Guava Rejuvenation. Central institute for Subtropical Horticulture, Lucknow, UP, pp 20