Status of an indigenous agroforestry system: A case study in Kumaun Himalaya, India


Abstract views: 295 / PDF downloads: 39

Authors

  • R S PARIHAAR Research Scholar, D S B Campus, Kumaun University, Nainital, Uttarakhand 263 001
  • KIRAN BARGALI Assistant Professor, D S B Campus, Kumaun University, Nainital, Uttarakhand 263 001
  • S S BARGALI Professor, Department of Botany, D S B Campus, Kumaun University, Nainital, Uttarakhand 263 001

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i3.47200

Keywords:

Agroforestry, Economic efficiency, Energy, Homegardens, Policy.

Abstract

The agro-forestry system is one of the best known indigenous practices for livelihood and sustainable development. In the present study a village Semalkhaliya (Ramnagar block) situated in bhabar belt of Kumaun Himalaya was analyzed with the objective to assess the indigenous agroforestry system with energy and economic efficiency of the landscape. This village includes 110 families with a human population of 631. Simultaneous agroforestry system was the main land use system being operated in the village. A total of fifteen tree species and twenty two crop species were reported from the study area. Among tree component, Mangifera indica, Tectona grandis and Populas sp were the most dominant species. The major cereals grown by the farmers were Triticum aestivum and Oryza sativa. Most of the surplus food was stored by the villagers for their use and rest is sold for cash. Besides food, the tree species grown in agroforestry based system were used for multipurpose such as fuel, fodder, medicine etc. Homegarden is another land use system which was commonly used by the farmers. In this system seasonal vegetable crops were grown with mixed plantation of fodder and fruit trees. In agroforestry system annual energy input was 81 905 MJ/ha and in home garden annual energy input was 53 913 MJ/ha. In terms of money, highest per ha annual productivity or income was greater in agriculture followed by the home gardens.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arora V P S, Bargali S S and Rawat J S. 2011. Climate change: challenges, impacts, and role of biotechnology in mitigation and adaptation. Progressive Agriculture 11:8–15.

Bargali S S, Bargali K, Singh L, Ghosh L and Lakhera M L. 2009. Acacia nilotica based traditional agroforestry system: effect on paddy crop and management. Current Science 96 (4): 581– 7.

Bargali S S, Singh S P and Pandya K S. 2004. Effects of Acacia nilotica on gram crop in a traditional agroforestry system of Chhattisgarh plains. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences 30 (4): 363–8.

Bargali S S, Singh S P, Shrivastava S K and Kolhe S S. 2007. Forestry plantations on rice bunds: Farmers’ perceptions and technology adoption. International Rice Research Notes 32 (2): 40–1.

Goland C. 1993. Field scattering as agricultural risk management. A case study from Cuyo, Department of Puno, Peru. Mountain Research and Development 13: 317–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3673760

Kittur B and Bargali S S. 2013. Perspectives of agroforestry: Present and future facets. Journal of Progressive Agriculture 4 (2): 91–4.

Leach G. 1976. Energy and Food Production. IPC Science and Technology Press, Guildford.

Maikhuri R K, Semwal R L, Rao K S and Saxena K G. 1997. Rehabilitation of degraded community lands for sustainable development in Himalaya: a case study in Garhwal Himalaya, India. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 4:192–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509709469954

Mishra A, Swamy S L, Bargali S S and Singh A K. 2010. Tree growth, biomass and productivity of wheat under five promising clones of Populus deltoids. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences 36 (2-3):167–74.

Mitchell R. 1979. An Analysis of Indian Agroecosystems. Inter print, New Delhi.

Nautiyal S, Maikhuri R K, Semwal R L, Rao K S and Saxena K G. 1998. Agroforestry system in the rural land scape- a case study in Garhwal Himalaya, India. Agroforestry Systems 41: 151–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006013832711

Pandey K, Bargali S S and Kolhe S S. 2011. Adoption of technology by rural women in rice based agroecosystem. International Rice Research Notes 36: 1–4.

Parihaar R S, Bargali K and Bargali S S. 2014. Diversity and uses of ethno-medicinal plants associated with traditional agroforestry systems in Kumaun Himalaya. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 84 (12): (In Press). DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v84i12.45221

Ramakrishnan P S. 1992. Shifting Agriculture and Sustainable Development. An Interdisciplinary Study from North-Eastern India. UNESCO & Parthenon Publishing Group, Carnforth.

Singh G S, Rao K S and Saxena K G. 1997. Energy and economic efficiency of the mountain farming system: a case study in the north-western Himalaya. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 9: 25–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v09n02_04

Singh L, Ghosh L, Bargali S S and Saxena R R. 2008a. Response of paddy planted under Butea monosperma trees in Chhattisgarh. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences 34 (1): 63–6.

Singh L, Ghosh L, Bargali S S and Saxena R R. 2008b. Influence of naturally occurring trees on field bunds and their impact on yield parameters of paddy crop. Range Management & Agroforestry 29 (2): 134–7.

Toky O P, Kumar P and Khosla P K. 1989. Structure and function of traditional agroforestry systems in the western Himalaya. I. Biomass and productivity. Agroforestry systems 9: 47–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120155

Vibhuti, Shahi C, Bargali K and Bargali S S. 2015. Seed germination and seedling growth parameters of rice (Oryza sativa) varieties as affected by salt and water stress. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 85(1): (In Press). DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i9.51554

Downloads

Submitted

2015-03-09

Published

2015-03-09

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

PARIHAAR, R. S., BARGALI, K., & BARGALI, S. S. (2015). Status of an indigenous agroforestry system: A case study in Kumaun Himalaya, India. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 85(3), 442-447. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i3.47200
Citation