Gamma irradiation sensitivity and optimal level for induction of mutation in tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa)


Abstract views: 309 / PDF downloads: 35

Authors

  • R JYOTHI Assistant Professor, KVK, Koppal, Karnataka, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012
  • K P SINGH Director, Directorate of Floriculture Research, Pune, Maharashtra

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i10.52310

Keywords:

Bulb stages, Gamma radiation, Radiosensitivity, Tuberose

Abstract

To evaluate the sensitivity, proper bulb stage and optimal gamma irradiation dosage to induce the attractive mutant in tuberose (Polianthes tuberose L.), a field experiment was conducted in 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi. Cultivars Prajwal and Phule Rajani with three different bulb stages, viz. freshly harvested bulb (B0), three weeks after uprooting (B1) and six weeks after uprooting (B2) were irradiated by 2.5 Gy, 5.0 Gy, 7.5 Gy, 10.0 Gy and 15.0 Gy of gamma rays. Probable LD50 dose of gamma irradiation was between 10.0 Gy to 12.0 Gy for freshly harvested bulbs and bulbs after six weeks after uprooting in cv. Prajwal and in all the bulb stages of cv. Phule Rajani. For bulbs after three weeks after uprooting probable LD50 dose was 3.25 Gy in cv. Prajwal and 10.25 Gy in cv. Phule Rajani. Non sprouting of Prajwal bulbs at B1 stage beyond 2.5 Gy was supported by the histological results. The all three stages of bulbs have showed different response over gamma irradiation. In general, we have observed sprouting and all the vegetative parameters decreased over increased irradiation level. Out of three bulb stages tested, freshly harvested bulbs (B0) responded comparably high to the gamma irradiation doses followed by bulbs after six weeks of uprooting (B2) in both the tuberose cultivars. From this study, it was concluded that gamma irradiation dose 7.5 Gy to 11.5 Gy could yield some attractive and useful mutants in tuberose.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abraham V and Desai B M. 1976a. Biological effectiveness of fast neutrons and gamma rays in some bulbous ornamentals. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 36(2): 230–7.

Abraham V and Desai B M. 1976b. Radiation induced mutations in tuberose. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 36(3): 328–31.

Anu G, Krishnan C K, Rajeevan P K, Valsalakumari P K and Saifudeen N. 2003. Induced mutation in tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa Linn) by gamma rays. (In): One Hundred Research Papers in Floriculture, Indian Society of Ornamental Horticulture, Division of Floriculture and Landscaping, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, pp 255–9.

Banerji B K, Datta S K and Sharma S C. 1994. Gamma irradiation on gladiolus cv. White Friendship. Journal of Nuclear Agriculture Biology. 23(3): 127–33.

Catcheside D G. 1948. Genetic effects of radiations. Advances in Genetics 2: 271–358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2660(08)60471-X

Gorden S A. 1957. The effects of ionizing radiations on plants: Biochemical and physiological aspects. Quarterly Review Biology 32: 3–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/401669

Gray L H. 1956. Biological damage from ionising radiations. In: Procceedings of International Conference on Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Geneva, pp 209–12.

Gupta M N. 1984. Cytomorphological studies on control and gamma induced mutants of tuberose. Journal of Nuclear Agriculture Biology 13: 140–1.

Gunkel J E and Sparrow A H. 1954. Aberrant growth in plants induced by ionizing radiation. Brookhaven Symposium on Biology, 6: 252–79.

Hansel H. 1966. Induction of mutations in barley, some practical and theoretical results. Mutations in Plant Breeding I (Proceedings. Panel Viena), IAEA, p 117–138.

Jain S M. 2005. Major mutation-assisted plant breeding programmes supported by FAO/ IAEA. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 82: 113–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-004-7095-6

Katagiri K and Lapins K O. 1974. Development of gamma irradiated accessory buds of sweet cherry, Prunus avium L. Radiation Botany 14: 173–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-7560(74)80033-5

Langenauer H D, Haskell D A and Osborne T S. 1973. Effect of acute X-irradiation upon growth of Parthenocissus tricuspidata axillay buds-II. Anatomical damage and recovery. Radiation Botany 13: 197–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-7560(73)80026-2

Lea D E. 1947. Actions of Radiations on Living Cells. Cambridge University Press, London, United Kingdom.

Misra R L and Choudhury B. 1978. Fascinatmg mutants in gladioli. Indian Horticulture 23(4): 21.

Neville P A, Nayana N B and Tanguay M. 1998. Mutagenic effects of acute gamma irradiation on miniature roses: Target theory approach. Horticulture Science 33: 127–9.

Nilan R A. 1956. Factors governing plant radiosensitivity. A Conference on Radioactive Isotopes in Agriculture. Michegan State University, Washington, US Govternment. Printing Office, p 151–64.

Omar M S. 1988. Effect of gamma ray on callus cultures and asexual embryogenesis in Phoenix dacryliferal. Plant Mutation Breeding for Crop Improvement 6(2): 258–64.

Predieri S. 2001. Mutation induction and tissue culture in improving fruits. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 64: 185–219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010623203554

Raghava S P S, Negi S S, Sharma T V R S and Balkrishnan K A. 1988. Gamma ray induced mutants in gladiolus. Journal of Nuclear Agriculture Biology 17 (1): 5–10.

Seilleur P. 1975. Effect of irradiation of gladiolus corm on the physiological behaviour of plant derived from them. Bulletin des Researches Agronomicque de Gembloux 10(3): 291–306.

Uzenbaev E H and Nazarenko L G. 1970. Some changes in growth and development of gladiolus under the effect of gamma irradiation from Co-60 Trudy. Bot. Sadov. Akad.Nauk. SSSR. 11: 26–30.

Downloads

Submitted

2015-10-06

Published

2015-10-06

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

JYOTHI, R., & SINGH, K. P. (2015). Gamma irradiation sensitivity and optimal level for induction of mutation in tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 85(10), 1370-1375. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i10.52310
Citation