Comparative performance of warm season turfgrass varieties under Delhi conditions
Abstract views: 189 / PDF downloads: 82
https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v86i3.57016
Keywords:
Biochemical and physiological traits, Cynodon dactylon, Morphological, Paspalum notatum, Warm season turfgrassAbstract
The present investigation was carried out at Division of Floriculture and Landscaping, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design (RBD) with three replications and seven treatments consisting of six varieties (viz. Selection 1, Bargusto, Panama, Panam, Palma and Tifdwarf 419) and Paspalum notatum species. These were evaluated for their suitability to be used as turfgrass under Delhi conditions. The suitability was evaluated on the basis of different morphological, physiological and biochemical traits. Out of evaluated varieties and species, Tifdwarf 419 exhibited better performance with respect to shoot dry weight (2.03 g/ 100 cm2), shoot fresh weight (5.78 g/100 cm2), root length (17.17 cm), root density (35.00 number/100 cm3), relative water content (86.96 %), chlorophyll a (2.63 mg/g fresh weight), chlorophyll b (0.53 mg/g fresh weight) and total chlorophyll (3.24 mg/g fresh weight) when compared to other varieties. Apart from these characteristics, short shoot length of 6.07 cm and high shoot density (331.27 number/100 cm2 area), along with good colour throughout the growing season was observed in Tifdwarf 419. Selection 1 also showed desirable shoot fresh weight (5.07 g/100 cm2), root length (16.10 cm), root density (28.87 number/100 cm3) and shoot density (395.40 number/100 cm2 area). The Cynodon dactylon varieties Tifdwarf 419 and Selection 1 were found to be most suitable to be used as turfgrasses in Delhi conditions.Downloads
References
Barrs H D. 1968. Determination of water deficits in plant tissue. (In) Water Deficits and Plant Growth, pp 235–368. Kozlowski T T (Ed). Academic Press, New York.
Brown R N and Gorres J H. 2011.The use of soil amendments to improve survival of roadside grasses. Hort Science 46 (10): 1 404–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.46.10.1404
Christians N. 2004. Fundamentals of Turfgrass Management, p 359. John Wiley and Sons Inc, NJ, USA.
Emerson A, Alberto G J and Gomide C A M. 2005. Canopy growth and development of Panicum maximum “cv” Mombaça. Brazilian Journal of Animal Science 34 (6): 2 164–73.
Esmaili S and Salehi H. 2012. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on postponing Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon [L.] Pers.) turf dormancy. Journal of Plant Physiology 169:851– 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2012.01.022
Fu J, Fry J and Huang B. 2004. Minimum water requirements of four turfgrasses in transisition zone. Hort Science 39 (7):1 740–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.39.7.1740
Grime J P and Hunt R. 1975. Relative growth-rate: its range and adaptive significance in a local flora. Journal of Ecology 63: 393–422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2258728
Han A A, Ehara H,Yasukawa M,Umezaki T,Nagaya Y and Morita O. 2005. Growth and dry matter production in the early to the middle growth stages after transplanting in Manaw Thu Kha, Myanmar rice cultivar. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 74 (4): 395–403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.74.395
Hanks J D, Waldron B L, Johnson P G, Jensen, K B and Asay K H. 2005. Breeding CWG-R crested wheatgrass for reduced maintenance turf. Crop Science 45: 524–8. http://www.censusindia.gov.in/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.0524
James J J and Drenovsky R E. 2007. A basis for relative growth rate difference between native and invasive forb seedlings. Rangeland Ecology and Management 60 (4):395–400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2111/1551-5028(2007)60[395:ABFRGR]2.0.CO;2
Lambers H and Poorter H.1992.Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: a search for physiological causes and ecological consequences. Advances in Ecological Research 23: 187–271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60148-8
LetoC, Sarno M, TuttolomondoT, Bella S L and Licata M. 2008. Two year studies into native Bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.) germplasm from Sicily (Italy) for the constitution of turf cultivars. Acta Horticulturae 7100:39–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.783.3
Lewandowsky M and Jarvis P G. 1977. Changes in chlorophyll and carotenoid content, specific leaf area and dry weight fraction in Sitka spruce in response to shading and season. New Phytology 79:247–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1977.tb02202.x
Lulli F, Volterrani M, Grossi N, Armeni R, Stefanini S and Guglielminetti L. 2012. Physiological and morphological factors influencing the wear resistance and recovery in C3 and C4 turfgrass species. Functional Plant Biology 39:214–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/FP11234
Macolino S and Ziliotto U. 2012. Comparison of turf performance and root systems of Bermuda grass cultivars and companion zoysia grass. Acta Horticulturae 938:185–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2012.938.23
Macolino S, Ziliotto U and Scotton M. 2004. Influence of cultivar and cultural practises on chemical composition of tall fescue turf. Acta Horticulturae 661:333–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.661.43
MarchioneV. 2004. Evaluation of growth rate and aesthetic traitss of several Bermuda cultivars in southern Italy. Acta Horticulturae 661: 399–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.661.55
Murdoch R, Aldous, D E and Delpratt C J. 2007. Effect of mowing height and frequency on some agronomic characteristics of a turf type weeping grass (Microlaena stipoides. Labill.) var stipoides. Acta Horticulturae 762: 107– 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.762.10
PessarakliM and Kopec D M. 2008. Establishment of three warm season grasses under salinity stress. Acta Horticulturae 7100: 29–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.783.2
Poorter H. 2002. Plant growth and carbon economy. (In) Encyclopaedia of Life Sciences, pp 1–6. Macmillan Publishers Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/npg.els.0003200
Rodriguez-Fuentes H, Acuna-Askar K, Vidales-Contreras J A, Rodriguez-Absi J, Jimenez-Gracia G, Lopez-Jimenez M A and Rodriguez-Ortiz J C. 2009. Mineral nutritional requirements for Bermudagrass grown on a professional soccer field. Acta Horticulturae 843: 129–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.843.15
Romani M, Piano E, Carroni A M and Pecetti L. 2004. Evaluation of native Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon) germplasm from Italy for the selection of adapted turfgrass cultivars. Acta Horticulturae 661: 381–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.661.52
RosenthalS I and Camm E L. 1977. Photosynthetic decline and pigment loss during autumn foliar senescence in western larch (Larix occidentalis).Tree Physiology 17:767–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/17.12.767
Rutledge J M, Volenec J J, Hurley R H, and Reicher Z J. 2012. Seasonal changes in morphology and physiology of roughstalk bluegrass. Crop Science 52:858–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2011.04.0225
SairamR K, Rao K V and Srivastava G C. 2002. Differential response of wheat genotypes to term salinity stress in relation to oxidative stress, antioxidant activity and osmolyte concentration. Plant Science 163: 1 037–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00278-9
StorkeyJ. 2004. Modelling seedling growth rates of 18 temperate arable weed species as a function of the environment and plant traits. Annals of Botany 93 (6): 681–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mch095
Sun J, MeyerW, CrossJ, and HuangB. 2013. Growth and physiological traits of canopy and root systems associated with drought resistance in tall fescue. Crop Science 53:575–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2012.05.0292
Turgeon A J.1980. Turfgrass Management, p 391. Reston Publishing Company, Virginia.
Volterrani M, Grossi N, Lulli F and Gaetani M. 2008. Establishment of warm season turfgrass species by transplant of single potted plants. Acta Horticulturae 7100:77–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.783.7
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.