Soil fertility, leaf nutrient concentration and yield limiting nutrients in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) plantations of Surat district of Gujarat
Abstract views: 217 / PDF downloads: 71
https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v86i3.57036
Keywords:
DRIS, Foliar diagnosis, Leaf nutrient, Oil palm, Optimum range, Soil propertiesAbstract
A survey was conducted for assessment of soil fertility status, leaf nutrient concentration and identification of yield limiting nutrients in twenty six oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) plantations in Surat district of Gujarat. Soil pH, electrical conductivity (EC), organic carbon (OC), available potassium (K) (NH4OAc-K), available phosphorus (P) (Olsen-P), exchangeable calcium (Ca) (Exch. Ca) and magnesium (Mg) (Exch. Mg), available sulphur (S) (CaCl2-S) and hot water soluble boron (B) (HWB) content in surface (0-20 cm depth) and subsurface (20-40 cm depth) soil layers varied widely. Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System (DRIS) norms were established for different nutrient expressions and it was used to compute DRIS indices. As per DRIS indices, the order of requirement of nutrients in the area was found to be K > nitrogen (N) > B > P > Mg. Optimum leaf nutrient ranges as per DRIS norms varied from 2.63 to 2.85%, 0.16 to 0.18%, 0.56 to 0.88%, 0.34 to 0.84% and 9.10 to 32.5 mg/kg for N, P, K, Mg and B respectively. On the basis of DRIS derived optimum ranges, 65, 31, 35 and 8 per cent leaf samples had less than optimum concentration of N, P, K and B respectively. The optimum ranges developed could be used for efficient nutrient management.Downloads
References
Beaufils E R. 1973. Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System (DRIS). A general scheme for experimentation and calibration based on principals developed from research in plant nutrition. Soil Science Bulletin, 1, University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg. South Africa, 132 p.
Beaufils E R and Sumner M E. 1976. Application of DRIS approach for calibrating soil, plant yield and plant quality factors of sugarcane. Proceedings of the South Africa Sugar Technology Association 50: 118–24.
Behera S K, Rao B N, Suresh K and Manoja K. 2015. Soil nutrient status and leaf nutrient norms in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) plantations grown on southern plateau of India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,, India Section B: Biological Sciences. DOI: 10.1007/s40011– 015–0508–y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-015-0508-y
Behera S K and Suresh K. 2013. Soil and leaf sampling in oil palm. (In) Compendium of Lectures on Soil and Leaf Nutrient Analysis in Oil Palm, pp 14–9. Prasad M V, Behera S K and Mounika B (Eds). Directorate of Oil Palm Research, Pedavegi, India.
Bhargava B S. 2002. Leaf analysis for nutrient diagnosis, recommendation and management in fruit crops. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 50: 352–73.
Bhargava B S and Raghupathi H B. 2001. Analysis of plant material for macro- and micro-nutrients. (In) Methods of Analysis of Soils, Plants, Waters and Fertilizers, pp 49–82. Tandon H L S (Ed.). Fertilizer Development and Consultation Organization New Delhi.
Fairhurst T H and Mutert E. 1999. Interpretation and management of oil palm leaf analysis data. Better Crops International 13(1): 48–51.
Goh K J, Hardter R and Fairhust T H. 2003. Fertilizer for maximum return. (In) Oil palm: Management for High and Sustainable Yields, pp 279–306.
Fairhust T H and Hardter R (Eds). Potash and Phosphate Institute, Potash and Phosphate Institute of Canada, International Potash Institute, Singapore.
Gupta U C. 1967. A simplified method for determining hot-water soluble boron in podzol soils. Soil Science 103: 424–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-196706000-00009
Hanway J J and Heidel H. 1952. Soil analyses methods as used in Iowa state college soil testing laboratory. Iowa Agriculture 57: 1–31.
Jackson M L. 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis, Indian Edition. Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi.
Jones Jr J B. 1998. Soil test methods: Past, present, and future. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 29: 1 543–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629809370048
McLaughlin M J, Reuter D and Rayment G E. 1999. Soil testing- Principles and concepts. (In) Soil Analysis: An Interpretation Manual, pp 1–21.
Perverill K I, Sparrow L A and Reuter D J (Eds). CSIRO publishing, Collingwood. Mourao Filho F A A. 2004. DRIS: Concepts and applications on nutritional diagnosis in fruit crops. Science of Agriculture (Piracicaba, Brazil) 61: 550–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162004000500015
Narasimha Rao B, Suresh K, Behera S K, Ramachandrudu K and Manorama K. 2014. Nutrient Management in oil Palm. Technical Bulletin, DOPR, Pedavegi, pp 1–24.
Olsen S R, Cole C V, Watanable F S and Dean L A. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. Circular No. 939, U S Department of Agriculture, Washington DC.
Raghupathi H B and Bhargava B S. 1999. Preliminary nutrient norms for ‘Alphonso’ mango using DRIS. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 69: 648–50.
Rethinam P, Arulraj S and Narsimha Rao B. 2012. Assessment of additional potential areas for oil palm cultivation in India. Directorate of oil Palm Research, Pedavegi, pp 1–84.
Savita B, Raghupathi H B, Verma S and Anjaneyulu K. 2013. Nutritional status of sapota (Manilkara achras M. Fosberg) gardens and optimum ranges of nutrients for higher production. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 61(2): 112–6.
Sumner M E. 1978. Interpretation of nutrient ratios in plant tissues. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 9: 335–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00103627809366812
Walkley A J and Black I A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37: 29–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
Walworth J L and Sumner M E. 1987. The diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS). Advances in Soil Sciences 6: 149–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4682-4_4
Williams C H and Steinbergs A. 1969. Soil sulphur fractions as chemical indices of available sulphur in some Australian soils. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 10: 340–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9590340
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.