Effect of long-term tillage and diversified crop rotations on nutrient uptake, profitability and energetics of maize (Zea mays) in north-western India
![](/public/icon/gor.png)
![](/public/icon/pdf.png)
Keywords:
Cropping system, Energy, Maize glucose equivalent yield, Permanent bed, Profitability, Zero tillageAbstract
The current cereal based systems of South Asia are under threat due to multiple challenges of declining water table, escalating energy and fuel prices, shortages of farm labour, deteriorating soil health with overarching effects of climatic variability making farming uneconomical and unattractive. Conservation agriculture (CA) based management practices together with cropping system optimization have demonstrated to produce more with less while restoring, conserving and sustaining natural resources. In north-western India, maize (Zea mays L.) based systems are being advocated as an alternate to rice-based systems to address the issues of resource degradation particularly water table and climate-change-induced variability in rainfall and temperature, etc. However, targeting maize systems without futuristic best-bet crop management practices suited to production systems and ecologies, may lead to other problems. Therefore, we attempted to evaluate the performance of maize in kharif 2014 under long-term CA-based [permanent bed (PB) and zero tillage (ZT)] practices with conventional tillage (CT) as main-plots and four intensified irrigated maize systems [maize-wheat-mungbean (MWMb), maize-chickpea-Sesbania (MCS), maize-mustard-mungbean (MMuMb) and maize-maize-Sesbania (MMS)] in sub-plots under an ongoing trial established in 2008. During seventh year of study, higher maize glucose equivalent yield (MGEY) was recorded in ZT (2 942 kg/ha) and PB (2 774 kg/ha) while, the lowest in CT (2 576 kg/ha). Similarly maize glucose equivalent yield under diversified maize-based rotations was invariably higher in MCS and MWMb systems compared to MMuMb and MMS rotations. The results revealed that the maximum total N, P and K uptake (134.7, 40.9 and 156.6 kg/ha) as well as the protein content (8.7%) in maize grain were recorded in ZT, and minimum in CT. However, among the cropping systems plots the kharif maize planted in MCS plots registered the highest N, P, K uptake in stover and grain and protein (8.96%) content in grain. Maize net returns and BC ratio were significantly higher under ZT and PB planting compared to CT. Net returns and BC ratio under ZT and PB were higher by 18-29% and 26-38%, compared to CT plots, respectively. The maximum gross output energy (210.1×103 MJ/ha), energy efficiency (16.4) and energy intensity (8.50 MJ/`) were recorded under ZT. Tillage and cropping system interactions significantly influenced maize cob and grain yield in 7th year of experimentation and maximum yield was in ZT-MCS. Overall, our long-term results suggest that adoption of conservation agriculture-based tillage under MCS and MWMb systems can enhance crop productivity, profitability, nutrient uptake and energetics of kharif maize in north-western region of India and elsewhere under similar agro- climatic conditions.
Downloads
References
Alam M K, Islam M M, Salahin N and Hasanuzzaman M. 2014. Effect of tillage practices on soil properties and crop productivity in wheat-mungbean-rice cropping system under subtropical climatic conditions. Scientific World Journal 10: 40–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/437283
Alvarez R. 2005. A review of nitrogen fertilization and conservation tillage effects on soil C storage. Soil Use Management 21: 38–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/SUM2005291
Aulakh M S and Grant C A. 2008. Integrated Nutrient Management for Sustainable Crop Production, pp 619. The Haworth Press, Taylor and Francis Group, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780367803216
Aziz I, Bangash N, Mahmood T and Islam K R. 2015. Impact of no-till and conventional tillage practices on soil chemical properties. Pakistan Journal of Botany 47(1): 297–303.
Bhattacharyya R, Das T K, Pramanik P, Ganeshan V, Saad A A and Sharma A R. 2013. Impacts of conservation agriculture on soil aggregation and aggregate- associated N under an irrigated agroecosystem of the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10705-013-9585- 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-013-9585-6
Biamah E K, Rockstrom J and Okwack G. 2000. Conservation Tillage for Dryland Farming: Technological Options and Experiences in Eastern and Southern Africa. Regional Land Management Unit, RELMA/Sida, ICRAF, House, Gigiri, Nairobi, Kenya.
Blanco-Canqui H and Lal R. 2009. Crop residue removal impacts on soil productivity and environmental quality. Critical Review in Plant Sciences 28: 139–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680902776507
Blanco-Canqui H, Lal R, Post W M and Owens L B. 2006. Changes in Long-term notill corn growth and yield under different rates of stover mulch. Agronomy Journal 98: 1 128– 36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2006.0005
Chauhan B S, Gill G S and Preston C. 2007. Effect of seeding systems and dinitroaniline herbicides on emergence and control of rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in wheat. Weed Technology 21: 53–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-06-016.1
Congreves K A, Hayes A, Verhallen L L and Van Eerd L L. 2015. Long term impact of tillage and crop rotation on soil health at four temperate agroecosystems. Soil and Tillage Research 152: 17–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2015.03.012
Das T K, Bhattacharyya R, Sudhishri S, Sharma A R, Saharawat Y S, Bandyopadhyay K K, Sepat S, Bana R S, Aggarwal P, Sharma R K, Bhatia A, Singh G, Datta S P, Kar A, Singh B, Singh P, Pathak H, Vyas A K and Jat M L. 2014. Conservation agriculture in an irrigated cotton–wheat system of the western Indo-Gangetic Plains: Crop and water productivity and economic profitability. Field Crops Research 158: 24–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.12.017
Gathala M K, Kumar V, Sharma P C, Saharawat Y S, Jat H S, Singh M, Kumar A, Jat M L, Humphreys E, Sharma D K, Sharma S and Ladha J K. 2013. Optimizing intensive cereal- based cropping systems addressing current and future drivers of agricultural change in the northwestern Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 177: 85–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.06.002
Gathala M K, Ladha J K, Saharawat Y S, Kumar V, Kumar V and Sharma P K. 2011. Effect of tillage and crop establishment methods on physical properties of a medium-textured soil under a seven-year rice–wheat rotation. Soil Science Society of America Journal 75: 1 851–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2010.0362
Gomez K A and Gomez A A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. Second Edition. An International Rice Research Institute Book. A Wiley-Inter-science Publication, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Govaerts B, Sayre K D, Goudeseune B, De Corte P, Lichter K, Dendooven L and Deckers J. 2009. Conservation agriculture as a sustainable option for the central Mexican highlands. Soil and Tillage Research 103: 222–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2008.05.018
Hobbs P R and Gupta R K. 2004. Problems and challenges of no-till farming for the rice–wheat systems of the Indo-Gangetic Plains in South Asia. (In) Sustainable Agriculture and the Rice–Wheat System. Lal R, Hobbs P, Uphoff N, Hansen D.O. paper 6 Eds. Columbus, OH; New York: NY: Ohio State University; Marcel Dekker, Inc. pp 101–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203026472.ch6
Jat M L, Gathala M K, Ladha J K, Saharawat Y S, Jat A S, Kumar V, Sharma S K, Kumar V and Gupta R K. 2009. Evaluation of precision land levelling and double zero tillage systems in the rice–wheat rotation: water use, productivity, proûtability and soil physical properties. Soil and Tillage Research 105: 112–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2009.06.003
Jat M L, Gathala M K, Saharawat Y S, Tetarwal J P, Gupta Raj and Singh-Yadvinder. 2013. Double no-till and permanent raised beds in maize–wheat rotation of north-western Indo- Gangetic plains of India: effects on crop yields, water productivity, proûtability and soil physical properties. Field Crops Research 149: 291–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.04.024
Kaschuk G, Alberton O and Hungria M. 2010. Three decades of soil microbial biomass studies in Brazilian ecosystems: lessons learned about soil quality and indications for improving sustainability. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 42:1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.08.020
Ladha J K, Kumar V, Alam M M, Sharma S, Gathala M K, Chandna P, Saharawat Y S and Balasubramanian V. 2009. Integrating crop and resource management technologies for enhanced productivity, proûtability and sustainability of the rice–wheat system in South Asia. In: Ladha, J.K., et al. (Eds.), Integrated Crop and Resource Management in the Rice– Wheat System of South Asia. IRRI, Los Banos, the Philippines, pp 69–108.
Lahmar R. 2010. Adoption of conservation agriculture in Europe: lessons of the KASSA project. Land Use Policy 27: 4–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.02.001
Meelu O P, Beri V, Sharma K N, Jalota S K and Sandhu B S. 1979. Influence of paddy and corn in different rotations on wheat yield nutrient removal and soil properties. Plant and Soil 51: 51–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02205926
Mittal J P and Dhawan K C. 1998. Research manual on energy requirements in agricultural sector. ICAR, New Delhi, pp 20– 23.
Naresh R K, Rathore R S, Kumar P, Singh S P, Singh A and Shahi U P. 2014. Effect of precision land leveling and permanent raised bed planting on soil properties, input use efficiency, productivity and profitability under maize (Zea mays) -wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 84(6): 105-9.
Ozpinar S. 2006. Effects of tillage systems on weed population and economics for winter wheat production under the Mediterranean dryland conditions. Soil and Tillage Research 87:1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.02.024
Parihar C M, Jat S L, Singh A K and Jat M L. 2011. Energy scenario and water and productivity of maize based cropping system under conservation agriculture practices in south Asia. In: Abstracts of 5th world congress on conservation agriculture, incorporating the 3rd farming system design conference held at Brisbane, Australia from 26th to 29th Sept. Page: 144–5.
Parihar C M, Jat S L, Singh A K, Kumar B, Yadvinder-Singh, Pradhan S, Pooniya V, Dhauja A, Chaudhary V, Jat M L, Jat R K and Yadav O P. 2016. Conservation agriculture in irrigated intensive maize-based systems of north-western India: effects on crop yields, water productivity and economic profitability. Field Crops Research http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.fcr.2016.03.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.03.013
Parihar C M, Yadav M R, Jat S L, Singh A K, Kumar B, Pradhan S, Chakraborty D, Jat M L, Jat R K, Saharawat Y S, and Yadav O P. 2016a. Long term effect of conservation agriculture in maize rotations on total organic carbon, physical and biological properties of a sandy loam soil in north-western Indo-Gangetic Plains. Soil and Tillage Research 161: 116–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.04.001
Parihar M D. 2014. Studies on green house gas emissions and carbon sequestration under conservation agriculture in maize based cropping systems. Department of Agronomy, CCSHAU, Hisar, India.
Passioura J B. 2002. Soil conditions and plant growth. Plant Cell Environment 25: 311–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00802.x
Penning de Vries F W T, Witlage J M, Kremer D J. 1979. Rates of respiration and of increase in structural dry matter in young wheat, ryegrass and make plants in relation to temperature, to water stress and to their sugar content. Annals of Botany 44: 591–609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a085772
Prasad R, Shivay Y S, Kumar D and Sharma N. 2006. Learning by doing exercise in soil fertility. A practical manual for soil fertility, Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, p 68.
Ram H, Kler D S, Singh Y and Kumar K. 2010. Productivity of maize (Zea mays)–wheat (Triticum aestivum) system under different tillage and crop establishment practices. Indian Journal of Agronomy 55(3): 185–90.
Saharawat Y S, Ladha J K, Pathak H, Gathala M, Chaudhary N and Jat M L. 2012. Simulation of resource-conserving technologies on productivity, income and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission in rice–wheat system. Journal of Soil Science and Environment Management 3: 9–22.
Sharma A R, Jat M L, Saharawat Y S, Singh V P and Singh R. 2012. Conservation agriculture for improving productivity and resource-use efficiency: prospects and research needs in Indian context. Indian Journal of Agronomy 57: 131–40.
Singh M K, Pal S K, Thakur R and Verma U N. 1997. Energy input– output relationship of cropping systems. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 67(6): 262–4.
Unger P W and Jones O R. 1998. Long-term tillage and cropping systems affect bulk density and penetration resistance of soil cropped to dryland wheat and grain sorghum. Soil and Tillage Research 45: 39–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(97)00068-8
Wani S P, Rupela O P and Lee K K. 1995. Sustainable agriculture in the semi-arid tropics trough biological fixation in grain legumes. Plant and Soil 174: 29–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0055-7_2
West T O and Post W M. 2002. Soil organic carbon sequestration rates by tillage and crop rotation: a global data analysis. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66: 1 930–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.1930
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.