Impact of different pest management modules against the major sucking pests complex of chilli (Capsicum annuum)


Abstract views: 235 / PDF downloads: 113

Authors

  • JAYDEEP HALDER ICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh 221 305
  • M H KODANDARAM ICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh 221 305
  • A B RAI ICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh 221 305
  • RAJESH KUMAR ICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh 221 305

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v86i6.58983

Keywords:

Chilli, PeLCV, Pest management modules, Thrips, Yellow mite

Abstract

Three different pest management modules were tested against major sucking pests complex of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) (thrips, yellow mites) and occurrence of Pepper leaf curl virus transmitted by whitefly [Bemisia tabaci (Gem.)] and compared with the untreated control. Two promising varieties (Kashi Anmol and Kashi Gaurav) were sown at experimental plots of IIVR and three pest management modules, viz. biointensive module (M1), integrated module (M2) and chemical module (M3) were examined for two consecutive years (2011-12 and 2012-13). All the tested modules were found significantly applicable over the control in terms of pest and disease management. Among these, integrated module (M2) comprising seedling dip with Imidacloprid 17.8% SL@ 1 ml/ l of water, spraying of Buprofezin 25%SC @ 1 ml/l at 25 DAT, Fipronil 5% SC@ 2 ml/l at 35 DAT, Lecanicillium (=Verticillium) lecanii @ 5 g/l at 45 DAT, Chlorfenapyr 10% SC@ 1.5 ml/l at 55 DAT, neem oil 1% at 65 DAT and their need based rotation was most effective in reducing the thrips and mite population in chilli and significantly enhancing the yield over control. Reduced yellow mite population was observed in both the varieties, i.e. Kashi Anmol (79.16%) and Kashi Gaurav (73.59%). Likewise, reduction in thrips population was also recorded in Kashi Anmol (58.09%) and in Kashi Gaurav (48.16%) varieties. However, occurrence of Pepper leaf curl virus was lowest in chemical module (M3), viz. 7.04% and 11.18% lower leaf curl infestation was observed, respectively in Kashi Anmol and Kashi Gaurav varieties followed by integrated module (M2) with 8.36% and 12.64% less leaf curl infestation. In terms of cost benefit ratio, integrated module (M2) was found applicable for both the varieties, i.e. 1:2.26 and 1:6.66 cost benefit ratios were recorded respectively in Kashi Anmol and Kashi Gaurav. Thus, integrated module (M2) may be adopted to get rid of these sucking pests menace.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahamd K, Mohamad M G and Murthy N S R. 1987. Yield losses due to various pest in hot pepper. Capsicum Newsletter No. 6: 83–4.

Desai H R, Bandhania K R, Rai A B, Patel A J and Patel M B. 2007. Assessment of yield loss and resistance to yellow mite Polyphagotarsonemus latus Banks in chilli. Vegetable Science 4(1): 46–50.

Halder J, Rai A B and Kodandaram M H. 2013. Compatibility of neem oil and different entomopathogens for the management of major vegetable sucking pests. National Academy of Science Letters 36(1): 19–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40009-012-0091-1

Halder J, Kodandaram M H, Rai A B and Singh B. 2015. Bio-efficacy of some newer acaro-insecticides against yellow mite (Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Banks)) and thrips (Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood) in chilli. Pesticide Research Journal 27(2): 171–4.

Halder J, Rai A B and Kodandaram M H. 2014. Parasitization preference of Diaeretiella rapae (McIntosh) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) among different aphids in vegetable ecosystem. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 84(11): 1 431–3.

IRAC. 2014). IRAC MoA Classification Scheme. Issued-February 2014, Version 7.3, pp 1–24.

Nandini, Giraddi R S, Mantur S M and Mallapur C P. 2011. Validation of IPM modules for management of Capsicum pests. Annals of Plant Protection Sciences 19(2): 299–302.

Pathipati V L, Lakshmi V T, Ramana C V, Kumari S S and Naidu L N. 2012. Evaluation of certain new caricides/insecticides for the management of chilli mite in Andhra Pradesh. Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems 18(1): 111–3.

Rai A B, Halder J and Kodandaram M H. 2014. Emerging insect pest problems in vegetable crops and their management in India: An appraisal. Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems 20(2): 113–22.

Rai A B, Satpathy S and Gracy R G. 2010. Pest management: present status and future thrust. (In) Advances in Chilli Research, pp 272. Kumar R, Rai A B, Rai M and Singh H P (Eds). Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Studium Press (India).

Reddy D N R and Puttaswamy. 1984. Pest infesting chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) in transplanted crop. Mysore Journal of Agricultural Sciences 19: 236–7.

Reddy A V, Srihari G and Kumar A K. 2015. Evaluation of certain new insecticides against chilli thrips (Scirtothrips dorsalis) and mites (Polyphagotarsonemus latus). Asian Journal of Horticulture 2(2): 8–9.

Sarkar P K, Timsina G P, Vanlaldikiand H and Chakraborty S. 2013. Arylpyrrole acaro-insecticide Chlorfenapyr-a tool for managing yellow thrips Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood) and broad mite (Polyphagotarsonemus latus Banks) of chilli. Journal of Crop and Weed 9(1): 188–192.

Tiwari A, Kaushik M P, Pandey K S and Dangy R S. 2005. Adoptability and production of hottest chilli variety under Gwalior agro-climatic conditions.Current Science 88(10): 1 545–6.

Downloads

Submitted

2016-06-07

Published

2016-06-07

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

HALDER, J., KODANDARAM, M. H., RAI, A. B., & KUMAR, R. (2016). Impact of different pest management modules against the major sucking pests complex of chilli (Capsicum annuum). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 86(6), 792–5. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v86i6.58983
Citation