Analysis of relative nuclear DNA content in carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus) accessions reveals ploidy levels by flow cytometry
![](/public/icon/gor.png)
![](/public/icon/pdf.png)
Keywords:
Carnation accessions, Chromosome counting, Flow cytometry, Ploidy levelAbstract
Carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) is one of the fifth most important ornamental species worldwide. Many desirable plant characteristics such as big size flower, adaptation to stress, and intra or interspecific hybridization capability are dependent on plant ploidy level. We optimized a quick flow cytometry method for DNA content determination in carnation accession samples that allowed a systematic evaluation of ploidy levels. To verify the actual ploidy levels, we counted chromosome numbers in the root tips of representative cultivar for each ploidy level. The relative nuclear DNA content was distributed into four kinds of discontinuous groups: 1.32 to 1.95 pg (group 1), 2.03 to 2.72 pg (group 2), 2.98 to 4.65 pg (group 3) and 5.33 pg (group 4) which might correspond to the following ploidy levels; diploid, triploid, tetraploid and hexaploid. The results showed that out of 60 carnation accessions, 33 were diploid, 5 were triploid, 21 were tetraploid and 1 was hexaploid.Downloads
References
Andersson-kotto I and Gairdner A E. 1931. Interspecific crosses in the genus Dianthus. Genetica 13: 77–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01725040
Balao F, Soriguer R C, Talavera M, Herrera J and Talavera S. 2009. Distribution and diversity of cytotypes in Dianthus broteri as evidenced by genome size variation. Annals of Botany 104: 956–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp182
Benett M D and Smith J B. 1979. Nuclear DNA amount in angiosperms. Philos. Trans. Res. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 274: 227–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1976.0044
Bonos A S, Karen A P and William A M. 2002. Ploidy determination in Agrostis using flow cytometry and morphological trait. Crop Science 42: 192–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.1920
Carolin R C. 1957. Cytological and hybridization studies in the genus Dianthus. New Phytologist 56: 81–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1957.tb07451.x
De Laat A M M, Gohde W and Vogelzakg M J D C. 1987. Determination of ploidy of single plants and plant populations by flow cytometry. Plant Breeding 99: 303–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1987.tb01186.x
Dolezel J and Bartos J. 2005. Plant DNA flow cytometry and estimation of nuclear genome size. Annals of Botany 95: 99– 110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci005
Dolezel J, Greilhuber J and Suda J. 2007. Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry. Nature Protocols 2: 2 233–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.310
Dolezel J, Greilhuber J, Lucretti S, Meister A, Lysak M A, Nardi L and Obermayer R. 1998. Plant genome size estimation by flow cytometry: inter-laboratory comparison. Annals of Botany 82: 17–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a010312
Eeckhaut T G R, Leus L W H, De Readt A C and Van Bockstaele E J. 2004. Occurrence of polyploidy in Rhododendron luteum Sweet, Hardy Ghent and Rustrica hybrids. Azalean 26: 32–7.
Galbally J And Galbally E. 1997. Carnation and Pinks for Garden and Greenhouse, p 310. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon,
USA.
Galbraith D W, Harkins K R, Maddox J M, Ayres N M, Sharma D P and Firoozabady E. 1983. Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science 220: 1 049– 51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4601.1049
Gatt M K, Hammett K R W, Markham K R and Murray B G. 1998. Yellow pinks: interspecific hybridization between Dianthus plumarius and related species with yellow flowers. Scientia Horticulturae 77: 207–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(98)00177-0
Ion B, Rodica R and Bara I C. 2003. The chromosomal number for rare species from Romania. Genetics and Molecular Biology 4: 62–70
Kato A, Vega J M, Han F, Lamb J C and James A B. 2005. Advances in plant chromosome identification and cytogenetic techniques. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 8: 148–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2005.01.014
Maria A A A, Enrique O, Jose M P P and Manuel A. 2013. Evaluation of ploidy level and endoreduplication in carnation (Dianthus spp.). Plant Science 201-202: 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.11.006
Nimura M, Juntaro K, Masahiro M and Kazushi O. 2008. Cross- compatibility and the polyploidy of progenies in reciprocal backcrosses between diploid carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) and its amphidiploid with Dianthus japonicus Thunb. Scientia Horticulture 115: 183–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2007.08.017
Sheela V L, 2008. Carnation. (In) Flowers for Trade, pp 95–112. New India Publishing, New Delhi.
Vainola A. 2000. Polyploidization and early screening of Rhododendron hybrids. Euphyptica 122: 239–44.
Weiss H, Dobes C, Schneeweiss G M and Josef G. 2002. Occurrence of tetraploid and hexaploid cytotypes between and within populations in Dianthus sect. Plumaria (Caryophyllaceae). New Phytologist 156: 85–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00500.x
Yagi M, Kimura T, Yamamoto T and Onozaki T. 2009. Estimation of ploidy levels and breeding backgrounds in pot carnation cultivars using flow cytometry and SSR markers. Journal of Japanese Society for Horticultural Sciences 78(3): 335–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2503/jjshs1.78.335
Yagi M, Fujita Y, Yoshimura T and Onozaki T. 2007. Comprehensive estimation of polyploidy level in carnation cultivars by flow cytometry. Bull. Natl. Inst. Flor. Sci. 7: 9– 16.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.