Influence of rootstock age and propagation methods on scion physiology and root morphology of Khasi mandarin (Citrus reticulata)
Abstract views: 193 / PDF downloads: 172
https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v87i2.67569
Keywords:
Mandarin, Propagation, Rootstock age, Root morphology, Scion physiologyAbstract
In Khasi mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) influence of rootstock age (i.e. 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 11, 12, 13, 14 months) and propagation methods (i.e. wedge grafting and T-budding) on graft/bud success, plant survival, scion physiology and root morphology were studied. The wedge grafting performed on six months old rootstock (T2) recorded maximum graft success (90.0%) and plant survival (88.87%) followed by T3 (80.0 and 77.17%), i.e. wedge grafting on seven months old rootstock, which was significantly (P=0.05) higher than T7 (68.33 and 67.78%), i.e.conventional T-budding on twelve months old rootstock. Morpho-physiological traits, viz. higher individual leaf fresh weight (0.42g) and dry weight (0.16 g), specific leaf weight (5.19 mg/cm2) and leaf thickness (496.67 μm) were recorded in T2. In addition, the leaf pigment contents, viz. chlorophyll ‘a’ (0.77 mg/g tissue) and total chlorophyll content (1.12 mg/g tissue) was found higher in T2 followed by T3 (0.76 mg/g tissue and 1.07 mg/g tissue). Similarly,
carotenoid content was recorded maximum in T2 (47.07 μ/g) at par with T-budding on eleven (43.15 μ/g) and 12 (42.94 μ/g) months old rootstock. Relative leaf water content was recorded highest in T3 (61.29%) and T2 (60.68%).
Further, T2 recorded higher total root length (385.36 cm) and root surface area (721.20 cm2) while, root volume was
recorded maximum in wedge grafting on five month old rootstock (156.29 cm3) at par with T3 (155.01cm3) and T2
(152.31 cm3). The root diameter was recorded highest in T7 (7.54 mm), whereas the root to shoot ratio was found
highest in T2 (0.88) followed by T3 (0.75) and T7 (0.70). The results suggested that wedge grafting method could be
gainfully exploited for Khasi mandarin propagation.
Downloads
References
Ali I A, Kafkafi U, Yamaguchi I, Sugimoto Y and Inanaga S. 1996. Effects of low root temperature on sap flow rate, soluble carbohydrates, nitrate contents and on cytokinin and gibberlin levels in root xylem exudate of sand grown tomato. Journal of Plant Nutrition 19:619–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01904169609365146
Awati M G, D’Souza G F, Renukaswamy N S, Anand C G, Venkataraman D and Udaya J. 2012. Root stock- scion grafting on physiological efficiency of Arabica coffee seedling. AGRIS 39(1): 11–8.
Davies B H. 1976. Carotenoids. (In) Goodwin TW, ed. Chemistry and Biochemistry of Plant Pigments, pp 38–165. Academic Press, London.
Dubey A K, Mishra M and Yadav D S. 2004. Softwood grafting in Khasi mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco). Indian Journal of Horticulture 61(3): 263–4.
EI-Motty E Z A, Metwally S E, Abou Y R and Farahat S A. 2010. Studies on growth, nutritional and microbiological status of citrus seedlings infested with root-rot disease. Nature and Science 8(4): 112–21.
Gupta S G, Srivastava A K and Sonkar R K. 2008. Nagpur mandarin evaluation on commercial rootstock in tropical central India. Tropical Agriculture 85(4): 1–5.
Hartmann H T, Kester D E, Davies F T and Geneve R L 1997. Plant Propagation: Principal and Practices, 8th Edn, pp 770. Prentice Hall of India Pvt Ltd, New Delhi.
Joalka N K. 1986. A note on the effect of method and time of budding on bud take in Kinnow mandarin. Haryana Journal of Horticultural Sciences 15: 64–5.
Karunakaran G, Ravishankar H, Sakthival T and Samuel D K. 2014. Optimization of micro-budding technique in Coorg mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco). Indian Journal of Horticulture 71(3): 311–4.
Mei L, Sheng O, Peng S A, Zhou G F, Wei Q J and Li Q H. 2011. Growth, root morphology and boron uptake by citrus rootstock seedlings differing in boron-deficiency responses. Scientia Horticulturae 129: 426–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2011.04.012
Nagel K A, Kastenholz B, Jahke S, Van-Dusschoten D, Aach T, Muhlich M, Truhn D, Scharr H, Terjung S, Walter A and Schurr U. 2009. Temperature responses of roots: impact on growth, root system architecture and implications of phenotyping. Functional Plant Biology 36: 947–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/FP09184
Passioura l B.1986. Resistance to drought and salinity: Avenues for crop improvement. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 13: 191–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/PP9860191
Patel R K, Babu K D, Singh A, Yadav D S and DE L C. 2010. Soft wood grafting in mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco): A novel vegetative propagation technique. International Journal of Fruit Science 10 (1): 54–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15538361003676793
Perez-alfocea F, Albacete A, Ghanem M E and Dodd I A. 2010. Hormonal regulation of source and sink relations to maintain crop productivity under salinity: a case study of root to shoot signaling in tomato. Functional Plant Biology 37: 592–603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/FP10012
Qiang S W, Ying N Z and Xin H H. 2010. Contributions of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to growth, photosynthesis, root morphology and ionic balance of citrus seedlings under salt stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 32: 297–304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-009-0407-z
Rodriguez R A, Gonzaenz A, Campos A and Fernadez M. 1986. Utilization of ring of bark of citrus related genera as interstock. Centro Agricola 13: 31–7.
Schroeder J I, Kwak J M, and Allen G J. 2001. Guard cell abscisic acid signalling and engineering drought hardiness in plants. Nature 410: 327–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35066500
Singh J, Yadav A, Bhatnagar P, Arya C K, Jain M C, Sharma M K and Aravindakshan K. 2012. Budding performance of Nagpur mandarin on different rootstocks under Hadoti region of Rajasthan. Indian Journal of Horticulture 69(1): 20–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0112.2017.00008.1
Singh S, Srivastava A K, Dass H C and Vijayakumari N. 1997. Screening germplasm of citrus rootstocks for salinity tolerance. Indian Journal of Horticulture 55(4): 283–7.
Skene D S, Shepherd H R and Howard B H. 1983. Characteristic anatomy of union formation in budded fruit and ornamental tree. Journal of Horticultural Sciences 58:2 95–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221589.1983.11515123
Sonkar R K. 2015. Promising citrus rootstock to mitigate climate change. Souvenir of the national symposium on sustainable citrus production: way forward, 27-29 November 2015, Nagpur, Maharashtra, pp 254-74.
Srivastava A K and Singh S. 2009. Citrus decline: Soil fertility and plant nutrition. Journal of Plant Nutrition 32(2):197–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01904160802592706
Srivastava A K, Kohli R R, Ram L, Huchche A D and Dass H C.1994. Cation exchange capacity of root as a marker for vigour of citrus species. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 64: 324–5.
Srivastava A K, Kohli R R, Ram L and Dass H C. 1998. Relationship between chloride accumulation in leaf and cation exchange capacity of root of citrus species. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 68(1): 39–41.
Thompson J A, Schweitzer L E and Nelson R L. 1996. Association of specific leaf weight, an estimate of chlorophyll, and chlorophyll concentration with apparent photosynthesis in soybean. Photosynthesis Research 49(1): 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00029422
Verma S and Mishra S N. 2005. Putrescine alleviation of growth in salt stressed Brassica juncea by introducing anti-oxidant defense system. Journal of Plant Physiology 162: 669–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2004.08.008
Wutscher H K. 1989. Alteration of fruits tree nutrition through rootstocks. Hort Science 24: 578–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.24.4.578
Zhou G F, Peng S A, Liu Y Z, Wei J Q, Han J and Islam Z. 2014.The physiological and nutritional response of seven different citrus rootstock seedlings to boron deficiency. Trees 28:295–307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-013-0949-y
Zoric L M, Ljubojevic L, Merkulov J, Lukovic and Ogananov V. 2012. Anatomical characteristics of cherry root stocks as possible preselecting tools for prediction of tree vigour. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 31:320–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-011-9243-7
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.