Physiological response of ornamental tree species to induced salinity


262 / 195

Authors

  • JAGREETI GUPTA Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004
  • R K DUBEY Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004
  • NIRMALJIT KAUR Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004
  • O P CHOUDHARY Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v87i5.70216

Keywords:

Irrigation, NaCl, Ornamental trees, Physiological response, Salt stress

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to explore the possibility about saline irrigation water may be used to grow ornamental tree species in pots under sub tropical condition of Punjab for two years (2015-16). Five salinity treatments of NaCl (analytical reagent) as 0 mM, 30 mM, 40 mM, 50 mM and 60 mM were given to one year old seedlings planted in earthen pots (10”) containing soil : FYM (2:1). These concentrations were given till October. After October month, i.e. in first week of November the treatments of NaCl as 0 mM, 30 mM, 60 mM, 90 mM and 120 mM were given. The results indicated that the increased salinity concentration in Bauhinia purpurea and Milletia ovalifolia significantly reduced the total chlorophyll, carotenoid and relative water content, whereas increased the cell membrane injury during both years. In Acacia auriculiformis and Cassia fistula, total leaf chlorophyll and carotenoids were maintained or slightly increased during first year and after that decreased, whereas relative water content increased with increase in salinity concentrations in first year and after that decreased. Electrolyte leakage in Acacia auriculiformis and Cassia fistula were maintained or slightly decreased during first year and during second year increased. It has been concluded that depending on the physiological responses, viz. total chlorophyll content, carotenoid content, relative water content and membrane permeability index, maximum salt tolerance was observed in Acacia auriculiformis followed by Cassia fistula, Bauhinia purpurea and Milletia ovalifolia. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bhattacharjee S and Mukherjee A K. 1996. Ethylene evolution and membrane lipid peroxidation as indicators of salt injury in leaf tissues of Amaranthus lividus seedlings. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 34: 279–81.

Brinkman R. 1980. Saline and sodic soils. (In) Land Reclamation and Water Management, pp 62–8. International Institute for Land reclamation and Improvement (ILRI), Wageningen, the Netherlands.

Chaum S and Kirdmanee C. 2008. Assessment of salt tolerance in eucalyptus, rain tree and thai neem under laboratory and the field conditions. Pakistan Journal of Botany 40: 2 041–51.

Cha-um S, Boriboonkaset T, Pichakum A and Kirdmanee C. 2009. Multivariate physiological indices for salt tolerant classification in indica rice (Oryza sativa L. spp. Indica). General and Applied Plant Physiology 35: 75–87.

Choudri G N. 1993. Effect of soil salinity on germination and survival of some steppe plants. Ecology 49: 465–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1934113

Cramer R C, Lauchli A and Polito V S. 1985. Displacement of Ca2+ by Na+ from the plasmalemma of root cells, A primary response to salt stress. Plant Physiology. 79: 207–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.79.1.207

Deshmukh P S, Sairam R K and Shukla D S. 1991. Measurement of ion leakage as a screening technique for drought resistance in wheat genotypes. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology 34: 89–91.

Flowers T J, Galal H K and Bromhem L. 2010. Evolution of halophytes: multiple origins of salts tolerance in land plants. Functional Plant Biology 37: 604–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/FP09269

Havaux M, 2014. Carotenoid oxidation products as stress signals in plants. Plant Journal 79: 597–606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12386

Hiscox J D and Israelstam G F. 1979. A method for the extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissue without maceration. Canadian Journal of Botany 57: 1 332–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/b79-163

Hossain M A, Uddin M K, Ismail M R and Ashrafuzzaman M. 2012. Responses of glutamine synthetase-glutamate synthase cycle enzymes in tomato leaves under salinity stress. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 14: 509–15.

Kumari S P K , Sridevi V and Lakshmi M V V C. 2012. studies on effect of salt stress on some medicinal plants. International Journal of Computational Engineering Research 2: 143–9.

Nader K, Hoorn J W, Hamdy A and Mastrorilli M. 2003. Salinity effect on crop development and yield analysis of salt tolerance according to several classification methods. Agricultural Water Management. 62: 37–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(03)00005-2

Kaya C, Higgs D, Kirnak H and Tas I. 2003. Ameliorative effect of calcium nitrate on cucumber and melon plants drip irrigated with saline water. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 26: 1 665–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1081/PLN-120022379

Khan MA and Abdullah Z. 2003. Salinity-sodicity induced changes in reproductive physiology of rice (Oryza sativa) under dense soil conditions. Environmental and Experimental Botany 49: 145–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-8472(02)00066-7

Mansour M M F. 1997. Cell permeability under salt stress. (In) Strategies for Improving Salt Tolerance in Higher Plants, pp 87-110. Jaiwal P K, Singh R P and Gulati A (Eds). Oxford and IBH, New Delhi.

Mansour M M F and Salama K H A. 1996. Comparative responses to salinity in wheat genotypes differing in salt tolerance, cell permeability, osmotic potential and cytoplasmic viscosity. Egyptian Journal of Physiology. 20: 17–32.

Mansour M M F and Salama K H A. 2004. Cellular basis of salinity tolerance in plants. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 52: 113–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.01.009

Morgan J M. 1984. Osmoregulation and water stress in higher plants. Plant Physiology 35: 299–319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.35.060184.001503

Morris J D and Thomso L A J. 1983. The role of trees in dryland salinity control. Proceeding of Research Society of Victoria 95: 123–31.

Percival G C and Fraser G A. 2001. Measurement of the salinity and freezing tolerance of Crataegus genotypes using chlorophyll fluorescence. Journal of Arboriculture. 27: 233–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2001.025

Perl T R and Perl A. 2002. Oxidative stress: an introduction. (In) Oxidative Stress in Plants, p 32 Inze D and Montagu M V (Eds) , Taylor and Francis, London.

Randhava G S and Mukhopadhyay A. 1986. Floriculture in India, pp 125–209. Allied Publishers Limited, New Delhi.

Ravindran K C, Venkatesanu K, Balakrishnan V and Thangavel B. 2007. Restoration of saline land by halophytes for Indian soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 39: 2 661–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.02.005

Sabater B and Rodriguez M I. 1978. Control of chlorophyll degradation in detached leaves of barley and oat through effect of kinetine on chlorophyllase levels. Physiologia Plantarum 43: 274–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1978.tb02577.x

Schonfeld M A, Johnson R C, Carwer B F and Marnhinweg D W. 1988. Water relations in winter wheat as drought resistance indicators. Crop Science. 28: 526–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1988.0011183X002800030021x

Schofield N J. 1990. Determining reforestation area and distribution for salinity control. Hydrological Sciences Journal 35: 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02626669009492401

Singh G and Jain S. 1981. Effect of some growth regulators on certain biochemical parameters during seed development in chickpea under salinity. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology 20: 167–79.

Singh K, Yadav J S P and Singh V. 1991 Tolerance of trees to soil salinity. Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science 39: 549–56 .

Singh N T. 1992. Dry land salinity in the Indo-Pakistan subcontinent. (In) Proceedings of International Conference on Arid and Semi-arid Land Studies, pp 197–284. Texas Technology University, USA.

Sohail M, Saeid A S, Gebauer J and Buerkert A. 2009. Effect of NaCl salinity on growth and mineral composition of Ziziphus spina-christi (L.) Willd. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Sub Tropics 110: 107–14.

Tabaei Aghdaei S, Harrison P and Pearee R S. 2000. Expression of dehydration-stress related genes in crown of wheat grass species having contrasting acclimation to salt, cold and drought. Plant Cell and Environment. 23: 561–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00572.x

Tinus R W. 1984. Salt tolerance of 10 deciduous shrub and tree species. (In) Proceedings of Intermountain Nurseryman’s Association Conference. Las Vegas, USA, pp 44–9.

Tiwari J K , Munshi A D, Kumar R, Pandey R N, Arora A and Bhat J S. 2010. Effect of salt stress on cucumber Na+, K+ ratio, osmolyte concentration, phenols, chlorophyll content. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 32: 103–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-009-0385-1

Tomar O S and Yadav J S P. 1980. Effect of saline irrigation water of varying EC, SAR and RSC levels on germination and seedling growth of some forest species. Indian Journal of Forestry 3: 306–14.

Toth B. 1981. Afforestation on salt affected soil in Hungary. Agrokemia ES Talajtan Tom. 30: 205–12.

Tuna A L, Kayab C, Ashraf M, Altunlu H, Yokas I and Yagmur B. 2007. The effects of calcium sulphate on growth, membrane stability and nutrient uptake of tomato grown under salt stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany 59: 173–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.12.007

Trivedi P K, Pathre U V and Sane P V. 1992. Photosynthetic characteristics of Acacia auriculiformis. Photosynthetica 26: 617–23.

Yeo A R. 1994. Physiological criteria in screening and breeding. (In) Soil Mineral Stresses: Approaches to Crop Improvement, pp. 37-60 Yeo A R and Flowers T J (Eds). Berlin. Springer- Verlag, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84289-4_3

Downloads

Submitted

2017-05-08

Published

2017-05-08

Issue

Section

Short-Communication

How to Cite

GUPTA, J., DUBEY, R. K., KAUR, N., & CHOUDHARY, O. P. (2017). Physiological response of ornamental tree species to induced salinity. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 87(5), 700–705. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v87i5.70216
Citation