Intellectual property protection: An emphasis on plant varieties


Abstract views: 181 / PDF downloads: 74

Authors

  • SHIV DATT Principal Scientist, Intellectual Property and Technology Management Unit, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Krishi Anusandhan Bhawan-I, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012
  • VIKRAM SINGH Scientist, Intellectual Property and Technology Management Unit, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Krishi Anusandhan Bhawan-I, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012
  • P K SHARMA Principal Scientist, ICAR-NBAIM, Mau
  • SANJEEV SAXENA ADG (IP&TM), Intellectual Property and Technology Management Unit, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Krishi Anusandhan Bhawan-I, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i3.78511

Keywords:

DUS, EDVs, Extant, Farmers’, New, Plant varieties and PPV&FR Act

Abstract

The enactment of Intellectual Property protection laws globally and involvement of private seed industry in India had become indispensable for protection of IP in agriculture as whole and plant varieties in particular. For protection of plant varieties, the Distinctiveness Uniformity and Stability (DUS) descriptors of various crops (vegetables, field crops, floriculture, horticulture crops, etc.) were developed and notified by the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers Rights (PPV and FR) Registry for testing. With increasing awareness of IPR in agriculture, the submission of applications of plant varieties from the notified crops for registration has started for protection under the Registry. Subsequently, public sector (Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and Agricultural Universities (AUs)); private sector; and farmers started submission of Extant, New and Essentially Derived Varieties (EDVs) applications in the notified crops. The study period pertaining to years 2007-2015 reveals that public sector has contributed immensely in protecting plant varieties of self-pollinated crops (food, fibre and pulses crops), whereas the private sector’s focus is largely confined towards open-pollinated varieties. Private sector has submitted highest number of ‘EDVs’ of tetraploid cotton. Progress in farmers’ varieties for protection under PPV and FRA reinforces the importance and uniqueness of this sui generis system adopted by India. It is, expected that the prospects of variety and seed development sectors will improve overtime. This trend also opens the scope for the plant breeders to design varietal development programmes for desirable traits in various crop species.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bala Ravi S. 2004. Effectiveness of Indian sui generis law on Plant Variety Protection and its potential to attract Private Investment in Crop Improvement. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights 9: 533–48.

Bala Ravi S. 2004. ‘Manual on Farmers’ Rights’. MS Swaminathan Research Foundation, Chennai.

Brahmi P, Saxena S and Dhillon B S. 2004. The protection of plant varieties and Farmers' Rights Act of India. Current Science 86 (3): 392–8.

DARE/ICAR. 2008. Intellectual Property and Technology Management. Chapter: Organization and Management, pp. 114-118. Annual Report (2008-09), Department of Agricultural Research and Education, Government of India.

DARE/ICAR. 2009. Intellectual Property and Technology Management. Chapter: Organization and Management, pp 125–6. Annual Report (2009-10), Department of Agricultural Research and Education, Government of India.

DARE/ICAR. 2010. Intellectual Property and Technology Management. Chapter: Organization and Management, pp 100–2. Annual Report (2010-11), Department of Agricultural Research and Education, Government of India.

DARE/ICAR. 2011. Intellectual Property and Technology Management. Chapter: Organization and Management, pp 101–3. Annual Report (2011-12), Department of Agricultural Research and Education, Government of India.

DARE/ICAR. 2012. Intellectual Property and Technology Management. Chapter: Organization and Management, pp 110–113. Annual Report (2012-13), Department of Agricultural Research and Education, Government of India.

DARE/ICAR. 2013. Intellectual Property and Technology Management. Chapter: Organization and Management, pp 114–118. Annual Report (2013-14), Department of Agricultural Research and Education, Government of India.

DARE/ICAR. 2014. Intellectual Property and Technology Management. Chapter: Organization and Management, pp 114–8. Annual Report (2014-15), Department of Agricultural Research and Education, Government of India.

DARE/ICAR. 2015. Intellectual Property and Technology Management. Chapter: Organization and Management, pp 114–8. Annual Report (2015-16), Department of Agricultural Research and Education, Government of India.

http://www.Plantauthority.gov.in.The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act, 2001.

ICAR. 2006. ICAR Guidelines for Intellectual Property Management and Technology Transfer/Commercialization. Indian Council Agricultural Research, New Delhi.

ICAR. 2014. ICAR Rules and Guidelines for Professional Service Functions (Training, Consultancy, Contract Research and Contract Service, Indian Council Agricultural Research, New Delhi.

Ramanna A. 2006. Farmers’ Rights in India: A case Study. Farmers’ rights project. The Fridtj of Nansen Institute, FNI Report 6/2006, 72.

Srivastava M and Chaudhary V. 2013. International conference on Global IPR system and WTO issues, November 16- 17, Ch. Charan Singh University Campus, Meerut (UP), pp 41–2.

Srivastava M, Chaudhary V and Pilani D S. 2015. Intellectual property rights on plant varieties in India: A sector-wise analysis. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights 20 (March 2015): pp 81–8.

The Gazette of India. 2001. ‘The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act. 2001. Extra pt II.

The Gazette of India. 2003. ‘The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Rules, 2003. GSR 738(E).

Downloads

Submitted

2018-04-03

Published

2023-03-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

DATT, S., SINGH, V., SHARMA, P. K., & SAXENA, S. (2023). Intellectual property protection: An emphasis on plant varieties. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 88(3), 400-409. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i3.78511
Citation