Intellectual property protection: An emphasis on plant varieties
Abstract views: 181 / PDF downloads: 74
https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i3.78511
Keywords:
DUS, EDVs, Extant, Farmers’, New, Plant varieties and PPV&FR ActAbstract
The enactment of Intellectual Property protection laws globally and involvement of private seed industry in India had become indispensable for protection of IP in agriculture as whole and plant varieties in particular. For protection of plant varieties, the Distinctiveness Uniformity and Stability (DUS) descriptors of various crops (vegetables, field crops, floriculture, horticulture crops, etc.) were developed and notified by the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers Rights (PPV and FR) Registry for testing. With increasing awareness of IPR in agriculture, the submission of applications of plant varieties from the notified crops for registration has started for protection under the Registry. Subsequently, public sector (Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and Agricultural Universities (AUs)); private sector; and farmers started submission of Extant, New and Essentially Derived Varieties (EDVs) applications in the notified crops. The study period pertaining to years 2007-2015 reveals that public sector has contributed immensely in protecting plant varieties of self-pollinated crops (food, fibre and pulses crops), whereas the private sector’s focus is largely confined towards open-pollinated varieties. Private sector has submitted highest number of ‘EDVs’ of tetraploid cotton. Progress in farmers’ varieties for protection under PPV and FRA reinforces the importance and uniqueness of this sui generis system adopted by India. It is, expected that the prospects of variety and seed development sectors will improve overtime. This trend also opens the scope for the plant breeders to design varietal development programmes for desirable traits in various crop species.
Downloads
References
Bala Ravi S. 2004. Effectiveness of Indian sui generis law on Plant Variety Protection and its potential to attract Private Investment in Crop Improvement. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights 9: 533–48.
Bala Ravi S. 2004. ‘Manual on Farmers’ Rights’. MS Swaminathan Research Foundation, Chennai.
Brahmi P, Saxena S and Dhillon B S. 2004. The protection of plant varieties and Farmers' Rights Act of India. Current Science 86 (3): 392–8.
DARE/ICAR. 2008. Intellectual Property and Technology Management. Chapter: Organization and Management, pp. 114-118. Annual Report (2008-09), Department of Agricultural Research and Education, Government of India.
DARE/ICAR. 2009. Intellectual Property and Technology Management. Chapter: Organization and Management, pp 125–6. Annual Report (2009-10), Department of Agricultural Research and Education, Government of India.
DARE/ICAR. 2010. Intellectual Property and Technology Management. Chapter: Organization and Management, pp 100–2. Annual Report (2010-11), Department of Agricultural Research and Education, Government of India.
DARE/ICAR. 2011. Intellectual Property and Technology Management. Chapter: Organization and Management, pp 101–3. Annual Report (2011-12), Department of Agricultural Research and Education, Government of India.
DARE/ICAR. 2012. Intellectual Property and Technology Management. Chapter: Organization and Management, pp 110–113. Annual Report (2012-13), Department of Agricultural Research and Education, Government of India.
DARE/ICAR. 2013. Intellectual Property and Technology Management. Chapter: Organization and Management, pp 114–118. Annual Report (2013-14), Department of Agricultural Research and Education, Government of India.
DARE/ICAR. 2014. Intellectual Property and Technology Management. Chapter: Organization and Management, pp 114–8. Annual Report (2014-15), Department of Agricultural Research and Education, Government of India.
DARE/ICAR. 2015. Intellectual Property and Technology Management. Chapter: Organization and Management, pp 114–8. Annual Report (2015-16), Department of Agricultural Research and Education, Government of India.
http://www.Plantauthority.gov.in.The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act, 2001.
ICAR. 2006. ICAR Guidelines for Intellectual Property Management and Technology Transfer/Commercialization. Indian Council Agricultural Research, New Delhi.
ICAR. 2014. ICAR Rules and Guidelines for Professional Service Functions (Training, Consultancy, Contract Research and Contract Service, Indian Council Agricultural Research, New Delhi.
Ramanna A. 2006. Farmers’ Rights in India: A case Study. Farmers’ rights project. The Fridtj of Nansen Institute, FNI Report 6/2006, 72.
Srivastava M and Chaudhary V. 2013. International conference on Global IPR system and WTO issues, November 16- 17, Ch. Charan Singh University Campus, Meerut (UP), pp 41–2.
Srivastava M, Chaudhary V and Pilani D S. 2015. Intellectual property rights on plant varieties in India: A sector-wise analysis. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights 20 (March 2015): pp 81–8.
The Gazette of India. 2001. ‘The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act. 2001. Extra pt II.
The Gazette of India. 2003. ‘The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Rules, 2003. GSR 738(E).
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.