Stability analysis for cane and sugar yield of advanced sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) genotypes

DEVENDRA KUMAR; L R MEENA; L K MEENA; KHUSHYAL SINGH; S P SINGH

doi:10.56093/ijas.v88i3.78759

Authors

DEVENDRA KUMAR Senior Scientist (Plant Breeding), ICAR-IIFSR, Modipuram, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh 250 110
L R MEENA Principal Scientist and Head, IFSM Division, ICAR-IIFSR, Modipuram, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh 250 110
L K MEENA Scientist (Plant Physiology), CSRM Division, ICAR-IIFSR, Modipuram, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh 250 110
KHUSHYAL SINGH Senior Scientist(Agriculture Extension) , TTHRD Division, ICAR-IIFSR, Modipuram, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh 250 110
S P SINGH ACTO, IFSM Division, ICAR-IIFSR, Modipuram, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh 250 110

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i3.78759

Keywords:

Genotype, GÃ—E, Regression, Stability analysis, Sugarcane

Abstract

The present investigation was undertaken to ascertain stable genotypes across nine environments. Ten advanced genotypes including three checks of themid-late group were evaluated for their adaptability in respect of cane yield, CCS yield and sucrose (%) for two crop seasons 2009-10 and 2010-11 under three locations with three cuttings. The stability of genotypes was worked out by using the model of Eberhart and Russell (1966). The regression coefficient (bi) and deviation from regression (S2 di) were used to define genotypic stability. Mean square due to G x E for all the characters was not significant. The genotypes CoBln 05502, CoP 05437 and CoP 9301 were stable and suitable for cane and CCS yield under favorable environments, while BO 91 was stable for CCS yield and sucrose per cent in juice under unfavorable environmental conditions. Apart from this, genotype CoP 05437 was on top and most stable and widely adaptable in cane and CCS yield across nine environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cruz C D, Rejazzi A J and Carneiro P C. 2004. Biometric Templates Applied to Genetic Improvement. UFV, Vicosa, Brazil, pp 480.

Dubey R B, Baudh Bharti, Khandagale S G and Chittora K. 2017. stability analysis for quantitative traits in Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). International Journal of Current Microbiology Applied Science 6(4): 1914-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.604.228

Ebdon J S and Gauch J r H G. 2002. Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction analysis of national turfgrass performance trials II Cultivars recommendations. Crop Science 42: 497-507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.0497

Eberhart S A and Russell W A. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science 6: 36-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x

Gauch H G. 1990. Using–interaction to improve yield estimates. (In) Genotype by Environment Interaction and Plant Breeding. Kang M S (Eds.). Department of Agronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, pp 141-50.

Guddadamath S S, Patel S R and Khendi B M. 2014. Stability analysis of cane and jaggery yield in elite sugarcane genotypes (Saccharum spp.). Indian Journal of Genetics 74(2): 261-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-6906.2014.00166.7

Kumar S, Singh J, Singh P K and Pandey D K. 2007. Stability of yield and its components characters in sugarcane (Saccharum spp hybrid complex). Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 77(4): 220-3.

Milligan S B, Gravois K A, Birchoff K P and Martin F A. 1990. Crop effects on broad-sense heritability and genetic advance of sugarcane yield components. Crop Science 30: 344-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000020020x

Queme J L, Orozco H, Ovalle W and Melgar M. 2005. Analysis of genotype by environment interaction for sugarcane base on the AMMI model. Sugarcane International 23(4): 21-4.

Sabaghania N, Dehghania H and Sabaghpour S H. 2006. Non-parametric methods for interpreting genotypes environment interaction of Lentil genotypes. Crop Science 346: 1100-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.06-0122

Tahir M, Rahman H, Amjad A, Anwar S and Khalid M. 2013. Assessment of genotype × environment interaction and stability of promising sugarcane genotypes for different agronomic characters in Peshawar Valley. Am. Journal Exp. Agric 3(1): 142-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/AJEA/2013/2282

Tai PYP, Rice ER, Chew V and Miller J D. 1982. Phenotypic stability analysis of sugarcane cultivar performance tests. Crop Science 22: 1179-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1982.0011183X002200060022x

Tiwari D K, Pandey P, Singh R K, Singh S P and Singh S B. 2011. Genotype × Environment interaction and stability analysis in elite clones of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics 5(1): 93-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ijpbg.2011.93.98