Comparative study of floral biology using detergent and confirm selfincompatibility system in protogynous lines of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)
Abstract views: 203
/ 
PDF downloads: 49
Authors
-
CHANDU SINGH
Scientist, ICAR-Indian Institute of Seed Science, Kushmaur, Mau, Uttar Pradesh 275 103
-
BORAIAH K M
Scientist, ICAR – Indian Institute of Seed Science, Kushmaur, Mau, Uttar Pradesh
-
RAJIV K SINGH
-
S P JEEVAN KUMAR
Scientist, ICAR - Indian Institute of Seed Science, Kushmaur, Mau, Uttar Pradesh
-
GYANENDRA SINGH
-
RAMESH CHAND
Keywords:
Brassica juncea, Detergent, Induced male sterile, Protogynous line (PG), Pusa Bold, SelfincompatibilityAbstract
Seven genotypes of mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj and Coss.], protogynous lines (F3-5 generation), cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) line and different concentrations (3, 5 and 8% (w/v)) of detergent (synthetic detergent powder was used in present investigation. There is effect of detergent which induces more prominent male sterility expression in Pusa Bold followed by Ashirwad genotypes and more vigorous during floral bud initiation, resist to scorching effect and delayed in flowering. Furthermore, the floral attributes, viz. anther length (mm), no. of pollen grains/bagged flower, pollen fertility, stylar length (mm), stigma receptivity, no. of ovules and seed set (%) were highly significant and which induced 100 % male sterility. Similarly, the pollen-ovule ratio was found to be nonsignificant and the yield0/plant significantly declined with increase in detergent concentration. The PG line showed more prominent stigma exertion, extended protogynous interval (9-10 days) and stigma receptivity (3-4 days) from its protrusion compared to induced male sterile line. The expression of male sterility in PG and CMS lines showed the partial sterility (30-50%) and absolute (100%) respectively. Further, the PG line had low seed set on selfing even it produces normal pollen (pollen viability test) but it was high seed setting occurs with out-crossing hence, it was confirmed presence of self- incompatibility system in the protogynous plants.Downloads
References
Agarwal D K and Kumar S P J. 2016. IISS Annual report 2015-16. ICAR-Indian Institute of Seed Science, p 25.
Al-Shehbaz and Ihsan A. 1977. Protogyny in the Cruciferae. Systematic Botany 2: 327–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2418468
Chakrabarty S K, Chandrashekar U S, Manjunath Prasad, Yadav J B, Singh J N and Dadlani M. 2011. Protogyny and self-incompatibility in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czern & Coss) - a new tool for hybrid development. Indian Journal of Genetics 71(2): 170–3.
Chakrabarty S K, Yadav S K and Yadav J B. 2007. Evaluation of stigma receptivity in cytoplasmic male sterile lines of Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss. (In) Heterosis Utilization. Proceedings of the 12th International Rapeseed Congress held at Wuhan, China during 25-30 March, pp 5–7.
Chandu Singh, Kumar S P J, Sripathy K V, Somasundaram G, Udaya Bhaskar K, Ramesh K V, Madan Kumar, S. Rajendra Prasad. 2017. Characterization and identification of rice germplasm accessions using chemical tests. Seed Research 45 (1):75–83.
Chauhan S V S and Kinoshita T. 1982. Chemically induced male sterility in angiosperm. Seiken Ziho 30: 54–75.
Chauhan S V S and Singh Vandana. 2002. Detergent-induced male sterility and bud pollination in Brassica juncea (L.) Czern & Coss. Current Science 82 (8): 918–20.
Chauhan S V S, Agnihotri D K and Singh V. 2007. Some new male gametocides-A review. (In) Plant Reproductive Biology and Biotechnology, pp 210–21. Chauhan S V S, Rana A and Chauhan Seema (Eds). Aavishkar Publishers Distributors, Jaipur.
Chauhan S V S, Gupta H K and Singh V. 2010. Sodium arsenate- Ametabolic inhibitor used as a chemical hybridizing agent for Brassica juncea (L.) Czern & Coss. International Journal of Plant Reproductive Biology 2(1): 93–8.
Chauhan S V S, Gupta H K and Vandana Singh. 2011. Efficacy of a novel ester azetidine 3-corboxylate as chemical hybridizing agents for Brassica juncea (L.) Czern & Coss. Journal of Indian Botanical Society 90(1&2): 139–41.
Cross J W and Ladyman J A R. 1991. Chemical agents that inhibit pollen development: tools for research. Sexual Plant Reproduction 4:235–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00200541
Cross J W and Schulz P J. 1997. (In) Pollen Biotechnology for Crop Production and Improvement, pp 218–36. Shivanna K R and Sawhney V K (Eds). Cambridge University Press.
Dafni A. 1992. Pollination ecology: a practical approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Jagannath A, Arumugam N, Gupta V, Pradhan A, Verma P K and Pental D. 2002. Development of transgenic barstar lines and identification of a male sterile (barnase) /restorer (barstar) combination for heterosis breeding in Indian oilseed mustard (Brassica juncea). Current Science 82: 46–52.
Kofoid K D. 1991. Selection for seed set in a wheat population treated with a chemical hybridizing agent. Crop Science 31: 277–281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183X003100020008x
Kumar S P J, Kumar V G, Dash A, Scholz P, Banerjee R. 2017a. Sustainable green solvents and techniques for lipid extraction from microalgae: A review, Algal Research 21: 138–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2016.11.014
Kumar S P J, Prasad S R, Banerjee R, Agarwal D K, Kulkarni K S and Ramesh K V. 2017b. Green solvents and technologies for oil extraction from oilseeds. Chemistry Central Journal 11:1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-017-0238-8
Kumar S P J, Rajendra Prasad S, Banerjee R and Thammineni C. 2015. Seed birth to death: dual functions of reactive oxygen species in seed physiology. Annals of Botany 116(4): 663–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcv098
Kumar S P J, Rajendra Prasad S, Madan Kumar, Chandu Singh, Sinha A K and Pathak Avinash. 2016. Seed quality markers: A review. Research and Reviews: Journal of Botanical Sciences S3: 13–7.
Lavana K S and Banga S S. 1984. Floral biology in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) Czern & Coss. Genetica-Agraria 38: 131–38.
Levania M and Chauhan S V S. 2006. Efficacy of three chemical hybridizing agents in Brassica juncea var. Pusa Bold. Journal of Cytology and Genetics 7: 141–8.
Mankar K S, Yadav J B, Singhal N C, Prakash Surendra and Gaur Ashok. 2007. Studies on stigma receptivity in Indian mustard. Seed Research 35: 148–50.
Rawat D S and Anand I J. 1979. Male sterility in Indian mustard. Indian. Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 39: 412–5.
Shafer G S. 2000. Stigma receptivity and seed set in protogynous buffel-grass. Crop Science 40: 391–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.402391x
Shen J, Wang H, Fu T and Tian B. 2008. Cytoplasmic male sterility with self in-compatibility, a novel approach to utilizing heterosis in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Euphytica 162: 109–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9606-0
Shivanna K R and Rangaswamy N S. 1992. Pollen Biology- A Laboratory Manual, pp 45–7. Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77306-8_7
Singh A K. 1999. Male gametocidal effect of synthetic detergent in rice. Ind. J. Genet. and Plant Breeding 59(3): 371–3.
Singh R P and Singh P N. 1992. Impact of bee pollination on seed yield of mustard seed. J. Apic. Res. 31(3-4): 128–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.1992.11101274
Singh R P, Agarwal D K, Sripathy K V, S Rajendra Prasad, Kumar S P J. 2017. Varietal and seed replacement in the era of climate change. ICAR-Indian Institute of Seed Science, p 42.
Singh V and Chauhan S V S. 2003. Bud pollination and hybrid seed production in detergent induced male sterile plants of Brassica juncea (L.) Czern & Coss. Plant Breeding 122(5): 421–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0523.2003.00880.x
Singh V and Chauhan S V S. 2004. Evaluation of three chemical hybridizing agents in Brassica juncea (L) Czern & Coss. Brassica 6 (3&4): 71–3.
Singh V and Chauhan S V S. 2001. Benotriazole-A new chemical hybridizing agents for Brassica juncea (L). Journal of Cytology and Genetics 2: 81–3.
Singh K H. 2008. Hybrid development in mustard (Brassica juncea L.) – A success story. Sarson News 12(2): 2–3.
Sinha A K, Agarwal D K, Kumar S P J, Tiwari T N and Chaturvedi A K. 2016. Novel technique for precluding hybrid necrosis in bread wheat. International Journal of Tropical Agriculture 34 (3): 761–5.
Vinutha K S, S Rajendra Prasad, Parashiva Murthy, Kumar S P J, Rame Gowda, Ravishankar P. 2014. Optimization of seed production techniques in a single cross maize hybrid. Seed Research 42 (1): 210–6.
Vinutha K S, S Rajendra Prasad, Parashiva Murthy, Kumar S P J, Rame Gowda and Ravishankar P. 2014. Influence of staggered sowing, planting ratio and subtending cob leaf clipping on seed quality parameters of maize. Seed Research 42 (1): 91–7.
Watts L E. 1968. Levels of compatibility in Brassica oleracea. Hereditary 23: 119–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1968.10
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.
How to Cite
