Characterization of AMF-diversity of endosphere versus rhizosphere of tea (Camellia sinensis) crops


Abstract views: 184 / PDF downloads: 113

Authors

  • QIANG-SHENG WU Professor, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei 434 025, China
  • YA-DONG SHAO Postgraduate student, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei 434 025, China
  • XIU-BING GAO Associate Researcher, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei 434 025, China
  • TING-JUN XIA Associate Professor, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei 434 025, China
  • KAMIL KUÄŒA Professor, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei 434 025, China

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i2.87097

Keywords:

Glomus, Mycorrhiza, OUT, SSU rRNA, Tea

Abstract

Tea [Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze] crops are globally one of the important commercial crops grown predominantly on acidic soils, a natural ally in form of soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). The present study was carried out to characterize AMF-diversity in roots and rhizosphere of 20-yr-old Camellia sinensis cv. Yichang Dayecha grown in Xingshan, Hubei, China. Small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) was used to identify the diversity. Tea roots were colonized by native AMF species, with 32.71±3.50% of root mycorrhizal colonization. As many 163 and 177 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were observed in the clone library of rhizosphere soils and roots respectively, suggesting that roots inhabited more AMF species than rhizosphere soils, with as many 111 OUTs overlapped between them. There were only Glomus species and Claroideoglomus / Glomus predominantly observed in roots and rhizosphere soils, respectively, with Glomus Glo20 having highest relative abundance in rhizosphere (>75%) and roots (>25%). Soil and root samples were grouped with the high taxonomic similarity, indicating good group diversity in AMF associated with tea crops.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Balasuriya A, Arulpragasam P V and Ratnayake R M A. 1991. Mycorrhiza in tea. Tea Bulletin 11: 3–12.

Caporaso J G, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman F D, Costello EK et al. 2010. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nature Methods 7: 335–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303

Edgar R C. 2013. UPARSE: Highly accurate otu sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nature Methods 10: 996–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2604

Geel M V, Busschaert P, Honnay O and Lievens B. 2014. Evaluation of six primer pairs targeting the nuclear rRNA operon for characterization of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (AMF) communities using 454 pyrosequencing. Journal of Microbiological Methods 106: 93–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2014.08.006

Karthikeyan A, Muthukumar T and Udaiyan K. 2012. Response of tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze) to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under plantation nursery conditions. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 22: 305–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2005.9755294

Li H, Huang W, Wang GL, Wang WL, Cui X and Zhang J. 2017. Transcriptomic analysis of the biosynthesis, recycling, and distribution of ascorbic acid during leaf development in tea plant (Camellia sinesis (L.) Kuntze). Scientific Reports 7: 46212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep46212

Lü L H, Zou Y N and Wu QS. 2018. Relationship between arbuscular mycorrhizas and plant growth: improvement or depression?. Root Biology, pp 451–464. Giri B, Prasad R and Varma A (Eds). Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75910-4_18

Magoč T and Salzberg S L. 2011. FLASH: Fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27: 2957–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507

Phillips J M and Hayman D S. 1970. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 55: 158–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(70)80110-3

Powell J R and Rillig M C. 2018. Biodiversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and ecosystem function. New Phytologist 217: 1254–66.

Shao Y D, Zhang D J, Hu X C, Wu Q S, Jiang C J, Xia T J, Gao X B and Kuca K. 2018. Mycorrhiza-induced changes in root growth and nutrient absorption of tea plants. Plant Soil and Environment 64: 283–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/126/2018-PSE

Singh S, Pandey A, Chaurasia B and Palni L M S. 2008. Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with the rhizosphere of tea growing in ‘natural’ and ‘cultivated’ ecosites. Biology and Fertility of Soils 44: 491–500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-007-0231-9

Singh S, Pandey A, Kumar B and Lokmans P. 2010. Enhancement in growth and quality parameters of tea [Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze] through inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in an acid soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils 46: 427–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-010-0448-x

Srivastava A K, Malhotra S K and Krishnakumar N K 2015. Exploiting nutrient-microbe synergy in unlocking productivity potential of perennial fruits: A review. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 84: 459–81.

Wang S, Srivastava A K, Wu Q S and Fokom R. 2014. The effect of mycorrhizal inoculation on the rhizosphere properties of trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata L. Raf.). Scientia Horticulturae 170: 137–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.03.003

Wu Q S, Srivastava A K and Zou Y N. 2013. AMF-induced tolerant to drought stress in citrus. Scientia Horticulturae 164: 77–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2013.09.010

Wu Q S, Srivastava A K, Zou Y N and Malhotra S K. 2017a. Mycorrhizas in citrus: Beyond soil fertility and plant nutrition. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 87: 427–443.

Wu Q S, Sun P and Srivastava A K. 2017b. AMF diversity in citrus rhizosphere. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 87:653–6.

Downloads

Submitted

2019-02-18

Published

2019-02-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

WU, Q.-S., SHAO, Y.-D., GAO, X.-B., XIA, T.-J., & KUÄŒA, K. (2019). Characterization of AMF-diversity of endosphere versus rhizosphere of tea (Camellia sinensis) crops. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 89(2), 348–352. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i2.87097
Citation