Mineral nutrient analysis of three halophytic grasses under sodic and saline stress conditions

CHARU LATA; ASHWANI KUMAR; ANITA MANN; SHOBHA SONI; B L MEENA; SULEKHA RANI

doi:10.56093/ijas.v92i9.91277

Authors

CHARU LATA ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal
ASHWANI KUMAR ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana
ANITA MANN ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana
SHOBHA SONI ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana
B L MEENA ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana
SULEKHA RANI Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, Haryana

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v92i9.91277

Keywords:

Leptachloa, Nutrients, Sporobolus, Urochondra

Abstract

Present study was carried out to assess the effects of soil salinity/sodicity on mineral nutrient status of Urochondra setulosa, Leptochloa fusca and Sporobolus marginatus at ICAR- Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana during 2016–19. Treatments of salinity/sodicity (pH ~ 9.5, pH ~ 10, ECe ~ 30 dS/m, ECe ~ 40 dS/m and ECe ~ 50 dS/m) were created in microplots (2.5 m × 1.5 m × 0.5 m) using saline/sodic water. Na+ and Cl– content (% DW) significantly increased with increasing sodicity/salinity stress condition in all three grass halophytes, whereas K+ content decreased. These grass halophytic species showed relatively less reduction in Ca, Mg and Fe contents up to sodic stress of pH ~ 9.5 and salinity level of ECe ~ 40 dS/m. Zn, Cu and Mn content decreased with increasing stress conditions but higher decrease was observed under sodic stress. The Na+/K+ and Na+/Ca2+ ratio was considered as indicators for measuring salt tolerance in plants. Na+/K+ ratio increased with increasing stress condition in all the three grasses but Leptachloa maintained their Na+/K+ near pH 1.0 under sodic stress condition and also maintained their Na+/Ca2+ below 1.0 up to pH ~ 9.5 and ECe ~ 40 dS/m. Higher sodic stress of pH~10.0 caused significant increase in Na+/Ca2+ in Urochondra and Sporobolus, whereas under highest salinity level, Leptachloa showed highest value for Na+/Ca2+. Changes in the accumulation patterns of nutrient in response to salinity is an important aspect and study showed highest positive correlation between Ca - Mg & Zn and negative between Na - Ca and K.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aravind P and Prasad M N V. 2004. Zinc protects chloroplasts and associated photochemical functions in cadmium exposed Ceratophyllum demersum (L.) a fresh water macrophyte. Plant Science 166: 1321–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.01.011

Chhabra R. 1973. ‘Kinetics of absorption of chloride and phosphorus, their interaction and effect on growth and composition of tomato plants’. Ph D thesis, KUL, Belgium.

Grattan S R and Grieve C M. 1994. Mineral nutrient acquisition and response by plants grown in saline environments. Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress, pp. 203–26. Pessarakali M. (Eds). New York: Marcel Dekker.

Hasegawa P M, Bressan R A, Zhu J K and Bohnert H J. 2000. Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology 51: 463–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.51.1.463

Hu Y and Schmidhalter U. 2001. Effects of salinity and macronutrient levels on micronutrients in wheat. Journal of Plant Nutrition 24: 273–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1081/PLN-100001387

Koksal N, Alkan-Torun A, Kulahlioglu I, Ertargin E and Karalar E. 2016. Ion uptake of marigold under saline growth conditions. Springer Plus 5: 139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1815-3

Kumar A, Kumar A, Lata C and Kumar S. 2016. Eco-physiological responses of Aeluropus lagopoides (grass halophyte) and Suaeda nudiflora (non-grass halophyte) under individual and interactive sodic and salt stress. South African Journal of Botany 105: 36–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2015.12.006

Kumar A, Kumar A, Lata C, Kumar S, Mangalassery S, Singh J P, Mishra A K and Dayal D. 2018b. Effect of salinity and alkalinity on responses of halophytic grasses Sporobolus marginatus and Urochondra setulosa. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 88(8): 1296–04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i8.82578

Kumar A, Kumar A, Kumar P, Lata C and Kumar S. 2018c. Effect of individual and interactive alkalinity and salinity on physiological, biochemical and nutritional traits of Marvell grass. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 56: 573–81.

Kumar A, Mann A, Kumar A, Devi S and Sharma P C. 2018a. Potential and role of halophyte crops in saline environments. Engineering Practices for Management of Soil Salinity, pp. 329–65. Gupta S K, Goyal M R and Singh A (Eds). Apple Academic Press Inc., Canada.

Kumar A, Mann A, Kumar A, Kumar N and Meena B L. 2021. Physiological response of diverse halophytes to high salinity through ionic accumulation and ROS scavenging. International Journal of Phytoremediation 23(10): 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2021.1874289

Lata C, Soni S, Kumar N, Kumar A, Pooja, Mann A and Rani S. 2019. Adaptive mechanism of stress tolerance in Urochondra (grass halophyte) using roots study. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 89(6): 1050–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i6.90834

Lucena J J. 2006. Synthetic iron chelates to correct iron deficiency in plants. Iron Nutrition and Interactions in Plants, pp. 103–28. Abadıa J, Barton L L (Eds.). Springer, Dordrecht. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4743-6_5

Mann A, Bishi S K, Mahatma M K and Kumar A. 2015. Metabolomics and salt stress tolerance in plants. Managing Salt Tolerance in Plants: Molecular and Genomic Perspectives, pp. 251–66. Taylor and Francis Group, LLC. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b19246-18

Mann A, Kumar N, Lata C, Kumar A, Kumar A and Meena B L. 2019. Functional annotation of differentially expressed genes under salt stress in Dichanthium annulatum. Plant Physiology Reports, DOI: 10.1007/s40502-019-0434-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-019-0434-8

Marschner H. 1986. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, p 674. Academic Press, London.

Meena B L, Kumar P, Kumar A, Meena R L, Kaledhonkar M J and Sharma P C. 2018. Zinc and Iron nutrition to increase the productivity of pearl millet-mustard cropping system in salt affected soils. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7(8): 3201–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.708.343

Meena B L, Rattan R K and Datta S P. 2017. Solubility relationship of iron and evaluation of its fertility status in degraded soils. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 48: 1059–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2017.1323098

Munns R and Tester M. 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology 59: 651–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911

Pessarakli M, Haghighi M and Sheibanirad A. 2015. Plant responses under environmental stress conditions. Advances in Plants and Agriculture Research 2: 276‒86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15406/apar.2015.02.00073

Rabhi M, Barhoumi Z, Ksouri R, Abdelly C and Gharsalli M. 2007. Interactive effects of salinity and iron deficiency in Medicago ciliaris. Research Biologies 330: 779–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2007.08.007

Rengel Z. 1992. The role of calcium in salt toxicity. Plant Cell Environment 15: 625–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1992.tb01004.x

Shabala S and Cuin T A. 2008. Potassium transport and plant salt tolerance. Physiologia Plantarum 133: 651–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.01008.x

Singh A, Kumar A, Datta A and Yadav R K. 2018. Evaluation of guava (Psidium guajava) and bael (Aegle marmelos) under shallow saline watertable conditions. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 88(5): 720–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i5.80062

Taiz L and Zeiger E. 2009. Fisiologia Vegetal, 4th edn, 848 pp. Artmed, Porto Alegre.

Xu G, Magen H, Tarchitzky J and Kafkafi U. 2000. Advances in chloride nutrition of plants. Advances in Agronomy 68: 97–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60844-5