Fodder productivity and profitability of different maize and legume intercropping systems


Abstract views: 310 / PDF downloads: 205

Authors

  • DEVENDRA SINGH GINWAL Research Scholar, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana 132 001, India
  • RAKESH KUMAR Principal Scientist, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana 132 001, India
  • HARDEV RAM Scientist, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana 132 001, India
  • SUSANTA DUTTA Research Scholar, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana 132 001, India
  • MALLIK ARJUN Research Scholar, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana 132 001, India
  • P S HINDORIYA Research Scholar, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana 132 001, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i9.93486

Keywords:

Crop productivity, Farm profitability, Fodder, Fodder maize, Legumes, Intercropping

Abstract

The current trend in global agriculture is to search for highly productive, sustainable and eco-friendly cropping systems. Intercropping of cereals with legumes is a recognized practice for economizing the use of nitrogenous fertilizers and increasing the productivity, quality, and profitability particularly in commercial grain crops but possibilities of fodder production in these intercropping systems is less explored. Availability of green fodder with improved quality to animals is the key to success of dairy enterprises and it is difficult to maintain the health and milk production of the livestock without supply of the quality green fodder. The growing of fodder crops in mixture with legumes has potential to improve palatability and digestibility of fodder (Kumar et al. 2018, Kumar et al. 2016). It is fact that about 65-70% of the total cost of livestock farming is attributed to feeding. However, green fodder production is a good way in order to curtail the cost on feed and fodder resources for sustainable livestock production. At present, the country is facing a net deficit of 35.6% green fodder, 10.95% dry crop residues and 44% concentrate feed ingredients. At the current level of growth in forage resources, there will be 18.4% deficit in green fodder and 13.2% deficit in dry fodder by the year 2050 (Anonymous 2015). The main objective of intercropping has been to maximize use of resources such as space, light and nutrients as well as to improve fodder quality and quantity. When legumes are used as intercrops, they provide beneficial effect on soil health by fixing atmospheric nitrogen, improving physical, chemical and biological properties. Hence, present study was undertaken in order to to assess the productivity, soil nutrient status and economics of different forage maize-legumes based intercropping systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonymous. 2015. Annual Report, IGFRI, Jhansi.

AOAC. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis, Eighteenth revised.

Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, Virginia, USA.

Gomez K A and Gomez A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, p 680. John Willey and Sons, Singapore.

Hamd Alla W A, Shalaby E M, Dawood R A and Zohry A A. 2014.

Effect of cowpea with maize intercropping on yield and its component. International Journal of Biological, Biomolecular, Agricultural, Food and Biotechnological Engineering 8(11): 1258–64.

Jackson M L. 1967. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi, India.

Kumar G, Singh M, Kumar R, Yadav R K, Datt C, Paul K, Soni P G and Chauhan A. 2015. Yield and quality of fodder turnip as affected by nitrogen application and weed management during lean period. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 32: 57–62.

Kumar R, Kumar D, Datt C, Makarana G, Yadav M R and Birbal. 2018. Forage yield and nutritional characteristics of cultivated fodders as affected by agronomic interventions: a review. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 35: 373–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2231-6744.2018.00057.9

Kumar R, Kumar S, Singh M, Meena B S, Tomar S K, Datt C, Ram H and Rathore D K. 2016. Performance of quality protein maize under different planting windows. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 33:154–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2231-6744.2016.00026.8

Kumar S and Balyan J S. 2001. Production potential and net returns in sorghum+ cowpea under sole and intercropping Systems. Indian journal of Agronomy 46(3): 410–5

Misra B N, Singh B and Rajput A L. 2001. Yield quality and economics as influenced by winter maize based intercropping system in eastern Uttar Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agronomy 46(3): 425–31.

Olsen S R and Watanabe F S. 1957. A method to determine a phosphorus adsorption maximum of soils as measured by the Langmuir isotherm. Soil Science Society of America Journal 21(2): 144–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1957.03615995002100020004x

Prasad R, Shivay Y S, Kumar D and Sharma N. 2006. Learning by doing exercise in soil fertility. A practical manual for soil fertility, pp 68-70. Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi.

Ram S N and Singh B. 2003. Physiological growth parameters, forage yield and nitrogen uptake of sorghum as influenced with legume intercropping, harvesting time and nitrogen level. Indian Journal of Agronomy 48(1): 38–41

Sahu B and Ambawatia G R. 2003. Performance of maize-legume intercropping systems in rainfed conditions of Jhabua hills. Journal of Multidisciplinary Advance Research 8(2): 196–203.

Sharma K C. 2008. Fodder productivity and economics of multicut pearlmillet intercropped with clusterbean. Indian Journal of Agronomy 53(1): 51–6.

Singh B, Kumar S and Dhaka A K. 2004. Intercropping of cereal and legumes for forage production in kharif season- A review. Forage Research 36(4): 189–96.

Subbiah B V and Asija C L. 1956. A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soil. Current Science 25:

–60.

Surve V H, Patil P R and Arvadia M K. 2007. Effect of row ratio in cereal-legume fodder under intercropping system on biomass production and economics. Recent trend in agriculture. Water and Environment Research 2(1): 32–4

Surve V H, Patil P R and Arvadia M K. 2011. Forage production potential of sorghum, maize and cowpea under sole and intercropping Systems. Madras Agricultural Journal 98(10-12): 372–4.

Walkley A and Black C A. 1934. Estimation of organic carbon by chronic acid titration method. Soil Science 37: 29–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003

Downloads

Submitted

2019-09-11

Published

2019-09-11

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

GINWAL, D. S., KUMAR, R., RAM, H., DUTTA, S., ARJUN, M., & HINDORIYA, P. S. (2019). Fodder productivity and profitability of different maize and legume intercropping systems. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 89(9), 1451–1455. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i9.93486
Citation