Productivity enhancement of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) through innovative crop establishment technique


Abstract views: 197 / PDF downloads: 335

Authors

  • HAR VIR SINGH Scientist, ICAR-Directorate of Rapeseed Mustard Research, Bharatpur, Rajasthan 321 303, India
  • R L CHOUDHARY Scientist, ICAR-Directorate of Rapeseed Mustard Research, Bharatpur, Rajasthan 321 303, India
  • M D MEENA Scientist, ICAR-Directorate of Rapeseed Mustard Research, Bharatpur, Rajasthan 321 303, India
  • M L DOTANIYA Scientist, ICAR-Directorate of Rapeseed Mustard Research, Bharatpur, Rajasthan 321 303, India
  • M K MEENA Scientist, ICAR-Directorate of Rapeseed Mustard Research, Bharatpur, Rajasthan 321 303, India
  • R S JAT Principal Scientist, ICAR-Directorate of Rapeseed Mustard Research, Bharatpur, Rajasthan 321 303, India
  • O P PREMI Incharge, Crop Production Unit, ICAR-Directorate of Rapeseed Mustard Research, Bharatpur, Rajasthan 321 303, India
  • P K RAI Director, DRMR, Bharatpur, Rajasthan

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i10.94608

Keywords:

Chlorophyll content, Economics, Leaf area index, Mustard, Planting geometry, Transplanting, Yield

Abstract

A field experiment was carried-out for two consecutive years 2016-17 and 2017-18 during winter at ICARDirectorate of Rapeseed and Mustard Research, Bharatpur, Rajasthan to evaluate the performance of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) under innovative transplanting technique of crop establishment. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with two factors, i) planting geometries, i.e. 30 × 30 cm (T1), 45 × 30 cm (T2) and 60 × 30 cm (T3) and ii) transplanting dates, i.e. 13th October (D1), 22nd October (D2) and 01st November (D3) with three replications. The maximum plant height (199.2 cm), leaf area index (5.82) and chlorophyll content (43.29) were recorded with T2 and D1 during both the years. The significantly higher value of yield attributes, i.e. length of siliquae, number of seeds/siliquae, test weight and oil content were also recorded with T2D1 treatment during both years. Seed yield was recorded maximum with T2D1 treatment during both the years. Seed yield improved significantly with T2 by 9.1 and 19.5% over T1 and T3 respectively, whereas, yield improvement with D1 also recorded significantly higher by 8.3 and 32.2% over D2 and D3, respectively. The maximum net returns (` 100835) and B:C ratio (3.77) was also found with T2 than the other treatments. Among the date of transplanting treatments, D1 recorded the maximum values of these monetary parameters. Thus, we can conclude that transplanting of mustard on 13th October with 45 × 30 cm planting geometry is beneficial for getting higher yield as well as net monetary returns in the Rajasthan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adak T, Bhaskar N and Chakravarty N V K. 2011. Response of Brassica to micro environment modification under semi-arid agro-ecosystem. Indian Journal of Agriculture Sciences 81(8): 744–50.

Afroz M M, Sarkar M A, Bhuiyan M S U and Roy A K. 2011. Effect of sowing date and seed rate on yield performance of two mustard varieties. Journal of Bangladesh Agricultural University 9(1): 5–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/jbau.v9i1.8737

Angrej S, Dhingra K K, Jagroop S, Singh M P, Singh J and Singh A. 2002. Effect of sowing time and plant density on growth, yield and quality of Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata). Agricultural Research Journal 39(4): 471–75.

Bali A S, Shah M H, Hasan B. 2000. Effect of plant density on brown sarson under different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus. Indian Journal of Agronomy 45: 174–78

Bhuiyan M S, Mondol M R I, Rahama M A, Alam M S and Faisal A H M A. 2008. Yield and yield attributes of rapeseed as influenced by date of planting. International Journal of Sustainable Crop Production 3(3): 25–29.

Biswas C, Singh R and Vijaya P K. 2011. Dynamics of white rust disease in mustard (Brassica juncea) in relation to date of sowing and weather parameters. Indian Journal of Agriculture Science 81(12): 1187–90.

Hasanuzzaman M, Karim M F and Ullah M J. 2008. Growth dynamics of rapeseed (Brassica campestris L.) cv. SAU Sarisha-1 as influenced by irrigation levels and row spacing. The Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 2(4): 794–9.

Khushu M K and Singh M. 2005. Thermal response of mustard under rainfed condition of Jammu. Environment and Ecology 23(3): 683–86.

Kumar S, Singh J and Dhingra K K. 1997. Leaf area index with solar radiation interception and yield Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) as influenced by plant population and nitrogen. Indian Journal of Agriculture Sciences 42(2): 348–51.

Kumari A, Singh R P and Yashpal. 2012. Productivity, nutrient uptake and economics of mustard hybrid (Brassica juncea) under different planting time and row spacing. Indian Journal of Agronomy 57(1): 61–67.

Lallu R S, Baghel V S and Srivastava S B L. 2010. Assessment of mustard genotypes for thermo tolerance at seed development stage. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology 15(10): 36–43.

Masood M, Shamsi I H and Khan N. 2003.Impact of row spacing and fertilizer levels (Diammonium phosphate) on yield and yield components of canola. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 2: 454–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2003.454.456

Panda B B, Bandyopadhyay S K and Shivay Y S. 2004. Effect of irrigation level, sowing dates and varieties on growth, yield attributes, yield, consumptive water use and water use efficiency of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). Indian Journal of Agriculture Sciences 74(6): 331–42.

Pandey N M, Dubey S K and Singh G. 2015.Response of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) genotypes under different planting geometry. Current Advances in Agricultural Sciences 7(1): 79–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2394-4471.2015.00018.0

Panse V G, and Sukhatme P V. 1967. Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. ICAR, Publication New Delhi.

Ram P, Prasad K, Dixit V, Khan N and Sonker T C. 2008. Effect of row spacing and sulphur on growth, yield attributes, yield and economics of mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern & Coss]. Plant Archives 8(2): 633–5.

Sahar K, Delkhosh B, Hossein A, Rad S and Zandi P. 2012. The effect of different rates of nitrogen and plant density on qualitative and quantitative traits of Indian mustard. Advances in Environmental Biology 6(1): 145–52.

ShekhawatK, Rathore S S, Premi O P, Kandpal B K and Chauhan J S. 2012. Advances in agronomic management of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj & Cosson): An overview. International Journal of Agronomy doi:10.1155/2012/408284 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/408284

Singh D B, Malhi R, Kaur M and Kiran G S. 2015. Assessing the impact of agronomic spacing conditions on biophysical and biochemical parameters along with yield and yield components in cotton. International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research 6(1): 36–44.

Singh H V, Meena M K, Choudhary R L, Dotaniya M L, Meena M D, Jat R S, Premi O P and Rai P K. 2019. Effect of direct sowing and transplanting on yield performance of Indian mustard. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science 8(2): 509–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.802.058

Singh G K and Prasad K. 2003.Studies on the effect of row spacing and nitrogen doses on the yield of and profit from Indian mustard. Progressive Agriculture 3(1): 146–47.

Yadav R N, Bhan S and Uttam S K. 1994. Effect of sowing variety and plant population on growth and yield of rainfed Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). Indian Journal of Agronomy 39(4): 682–4.

Downloads

Submitted

2019-10-21

Published

2019-10-22

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SINGH, H. V., CHOUDHARY, R. L., MEENA, M. D., DOTANIYA, M. L., MEENA, M. K., JAT, R. S., PREMI, O. P., & RAI, P. K. (2019). Productivity enhancement of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) through innovative crop establishment technique. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 89(10), 1669–1673. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i10.94608
Citation