Stability of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) genotypes under diverse environments
500 / 229
Authors
-
AJAY KUMAR
District Extension Specialist, Vegetable, University Seed Farm, Usman (Tarn Taran)
-
T S DHILLON
Associate Director, Seeds, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
Keywords:
French bean, G × E interactions, GGE biplot, Stability analysisAbstract
The present investigation was undertaken to ascertain stable genotypes across six environments. Twenty five genotypes of French bean were evaluated for yield and quality traits in three different locations of Punjab during 2017–18. The stability of genotypes was worked out by using Eberhart and Russel (1966) and GGE biplot models. Highly significant mean squares for environments and genotype × environment interaction were recorded for all the traits except for protein content. The linear component of genotype × environment interaction was significant for all the characters under study. The highest green pod yield per plant was observed in genotype Arka Suvidha followed by Arka Anoop, Falguni, Arka Sharath and FB-3-16 which produced significantly more green pod yield than check Contender. Genotype FB VAR-5 was identified suitable for favorable environments and genotypes Arka Sharath, Arka Suvidha, Falguni, FB 2-16 and Swarna Priya were found promising for unfavorable environments. The genotype Arka Anoop was stable in all environments. In terms of environments KVK, Sangrur 2017 was more informative. The dry matter of genotype Contender was high while genotypes Arka Suvidha, Arka Anoop and Falguni produced highest protein content. All the environments were positively correlated for yield traits, which meant that same information about the genotypes could be obtained from fewer test environments, and hence depicting the potential to reduce testing cost by dropping one of them.
Downloads
References
Anonymous. 2017. Area and production of French bean.www.indiastat.com.
Eberhart S A and Russell W L .1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science 6: 36–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x
Fan X M, Kang M S, Chen H, Zhang Y, Tan J and Xu C. 2007.Yield stability of maize hybrids evaluated in multi environment trials in Yunnan, China. Agronomy Journal 99: 220–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2006.0144
Finlay K W and Wilkinson G N. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14: 742–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9630742
Gabriel K R. 1971. The biplot graphic of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrics 58: 453–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/58.3.453
Gopalkrishanan P. 2007. Vegetable Crops. New India Publisher, New Delhi, India
Hosamani R M, Patil B C, Ajjappalavara P S, Naik, B H, Smitha, R P , Ukund K C and Mohammad A. 2010. Comparing stability
of snap bean genotypes. Indian Journal of Horticulture 67: 174–78.
Jayanthamma B P N. 1984. ‘Character association and stability analysis in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)’. M Sc thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru.
Keerthi CM, Ramesh S, Byregowda M, Rao M, Reena M and Chandrakant. 2014. Performance stability of photoperiod sensitive vs. insensitive Dolichos bean (Lablab purpureus L.) var. Lignosus under delayed sowing conditions. Australian Journal of Crop Science 8:1658–62.
Kroonenberg P M. 1995. Introduction to Biplot for G × E Tables. University of Queensland, Brisbane.
Lowry O H, Rosebrough N J, Farr A L and Randall R J. 1951. To determine total soluble protein by the lowrys method. Journal of Biological Chemistry 193: 265–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6
Pal A B and Prasad K V S R. 1996. Genotype × environment interactions and stability performance under changing climatic conditions in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Indian Journal of Horticulture 53:145–49.
Pan R S, Singh A K, Rai M and Kumar S. 2006. Stability analysis of yield and its components in bush type French bean. Vegetable Science 33: 145–48.
Pan R S, Singh A K, Kumar S and Rai M. 2009. Stability of yield and its components in bush type French bean under off-season (summer) cultivation. Vegetable Science 36: 35–38.
Perkins J M and Jinks J L. 1968. Environmental and genotype × environmental interactions and physical measures of the environment. Heredity 25: 29–40.
Pereira H S, Melo L, Faria L C, Diaz J L, Peloso M J, Joaquim and Wendland A. 2009. Stability and adaptability of carioca common bean genotypes in states of the central South Region of Brazil. Journal of Crop Breeding and Applied Biotech 9: 181–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12702/1984-7033.v09n02a11
Samonte S O P B, Wilson L T, Mc Clung A M and Medley J C. 2005. Targeting cultivars onto rice growing environments using AMMI and SREG GGE biplot analysis. Crop Science 45: 2414–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.0627
Singh S P. 2013. ‘Biplot analysis for estimation of genotype × environment interaction in advance sugarcane genotypes’. M Sc thesis, Punjab Agricultural University Ludhiana, India.
Singh A K, Tomer A K, Tyagi K and Singh P. 2007. Stability analysis for yield and its components in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Legume Research 30(3): 166–72.
Smitha D D P. 2005. ‘Divergence and stability studies in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)’. M Sc thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad. Karnataka, India.
Thakare P A, Lad D B, Dalavi N D and Bade B A .2016. Stability analysis for seed yield and its components in Rajmash (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes to different environments. International Journal of Pure and Applied Bioscience 4: 160–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.2396
Yan W. 2002. Singular-value partitioning in biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data. Agronomy Journal 94: 990–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2002.9900
Yan W and Hunt, L A. 2002. Genetic and environmental causes of genotype by environment interaction for winter wheat yield in Ontario. Crop Science 41: 19–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2001.41119x
Yan W, Hunt L A, Sheng Q and Szlavnics Z. 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Science 40: 597–605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.403597x
Yan W and Kang M S. 2003. GGE Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists, and Agronomists. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420040371
Yan W and Tinker N A. 2006. Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: Principles and applications. Canadian Journal of Plant Sciences 86: 623–4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/P05-169
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.
How to Cite
