Effect of phosphorus on yield and economics of maize (Zea mays) under semi-arid conditions of Afghanistan

N M Ahmadi; T K Das; N Nasrat; S S Rathore; A K Paul

doi:10.56093/ijas.v90i2.99052

Authors

N M Ahmadi M Sc Scholar, Afghanistan National Agricultural Science and Technology University, Kandahar, Afghanistan
T K Das Professor, Afghanistan National Agricultural Science and Technology University, Kandahar, Afghanistan
N Nasrat Lecturer, Afghanistan National Agricultural Science and Technology University (ANASTU)
S S Rathore Principal Scientist, Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi
A K Paul Principal Scientist, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i2.99052

Keywords:

Economics, Economic optimum dose, Maize, Yield

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the Afghanistan National Agricultural Science and Technology University (ANASTU), Kandahar, Afghanistan during 2015 to find out the optimum level of P in maize. Seven phosphorus levels at 0 (control), 15, 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90 kg P₂O₅/ha were laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Results showed that the application of 75 kg P₂O₅/ha resulted in maximum number of cobs/plant (1.8), number of cob/m (12.4), cob girth (14 cm), cob diameter (4.4 cm), thousand grain weight (261.2 g), grain yield (6.51 t/ha) and biological yield (19.43 t/ha) compared to those in control. A dose of 73.6 kg P₂O₅/ha based on grain yield, and a dose of 86.7 kg P₂O₅/ha based on biological yield of maize were economic optimum doses of P in maize. But, the 75 kg P₂O₅/ha resulted in highest values of most of the yield attributes, leading to highest grain, stover and biological yields and net returns. Therefore, a 75 kg P₂O₅/ha may be advocated to maize along with the recommended 150 kg N/ha, 20 kg K₂O/ha and 25 kg ZnSO₄/ha for obtaining higher yield and income in Kandahar, Afghanistan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alias A, Usman M, Ullah E and Warraich E A. 2003. Effects of different phosphorus levels on the growth and yield of two cultivars of maize (Zea mays L.). International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 5(4): 632–34.

Amanullah and Zakirullah M. 2010. Timing and rate of phosphorus application influence maize phenology, yield and profitability in Northwest Pakistan. Egyptian Academic Journal of biological Science 1(1): 29–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/eajbsh.2010.17014

Anonymous. 2013. Annual Report. Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock, Afghanistan.

Behera B and Das T K. 2019. Brown manure species, weeds and maize in a co-culture in the field: who stands more competitive? Pesticide Research Journal 31(1): 129–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-524X.2019.00001.3

Behera B, Das T K, Ghosh S, Kaur R and Singh R. 2018. Brown manuring in maize (Zea mays): Effects on weed interference and crop productivity. Indian Journal of Agronomy 63(4): 524–27.

Das T K, Saharawat Y S, Bhattacharyya R, Sudhishri S, Bandyopadhyay K K, Sharma A R and Jat M L. 2018. Conservation agriculture effects on crop and water productivity, profitability and soil organic carbon accumulation under a maize-wheat cropping system in the North-western Indo- Gangetic Plains. Field Crops Research 215: 222–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.10.021

Hussain M Z and Haq I U. 2000. Phosphorus sorption capacities of NWFP soils.In: Proceeding of Symposium on Integrated Plant Nutrient Management held in Islamabad 8(10): 284–96.

Hussain N, Khan A Z, Akbar H and Akhtar S. 2006.Growth factors and yield of maize as influenced by phosphorus and potash fertilization. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 22(4): 579–83.

Karki T B. 2003. “Response of maize to nitrogen, phosphorus and their interactions on grain yield.” MSc. Thesis. Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Engineering, IAAS, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal. pp.83.

Khan M A, Abid M, Hussain N and Masood M U. 2005. Effect of phosphorus levels on growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars under saline conditions. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 7(3): 511–14.

Nour A M, Lazim M E and Fattah A A. 2005.Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus on growth and yield of maize.Proceedings of the Meetings of the National Crop Husbandry Committee 37: 6–13.

Rai M, Singh R, Kumar A T, Pradhan V S A, Bharti S and Gupta V K. 2013. Handbook of Agriculture, pp. 1038.

Saad A A, Das T K, Rana D S and Sharma A R. 2015. Productivity, resource-use efficiency and economics of maize (Zea mays)- wheat (Triticumaestivum)-greengram (Vignaradiata) cropping system under conservation agriculture in irrigated northwestern Indo-Gangetic plains. Indian Journal of Agronomy 60(4): 502–10.

Sahoo S C and Panda M. 2001.Effect of phosphorus and detasseling on yield of baby corn. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 71: 21–22.

Sarajuoghi M, Ardakani M R, Nurmohammadi G, Kashani A, Rejali F and Mafakheri S. 2012. Response of yield and yield components of maize (Zea mays L.) to different biofertilizers and chemical fertilizers. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences 12(3): 315–20.

Susha V S, Das T K, Nath C P, Pandey R, Paul S and Ghosh S. 2018. Impacts of tillage and herbicide mixture on weed interference, agronomic productivity and profitability of a maize – wheat system in the North-western Indo-Gangetic Plains. Field Crops Research 219: 180–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.02.003

Yosefi K, Galavi M, Ramrodi M and Mousavi S R. 2011. Effect of bio-phosphate and chemical phosphorus fertilizer accompanied with micronutrient foliar application on growth, yield and yield components of maize (Single Cross 704). Australian Journal of Crop Science 5(2): 175–80.