Production, export and competitiveness of fish and fishery products in India: An analysis across technology and policy phases
236 / 0
Keywords:
Fish production, marine exports, competitiveness, research and development policy, structural breaks, Granger causalityAbstract
India's marine product sector has seen significant growth, benefiting consumers, boosting foreign exchange earnings, and supporting livelihoods. This progress is attributed to the research and development (R&D) efforts and the supportive policies. The Government of India has implemented targeted schemes to enhance fish production and exports, drawing from past experiences to inform future strategies. This study identifies five structural breaks in fish production and exports, coinciding with shifts in technology, policy, and institutions. From 1980–81 to 2018–19, national fish production increased annually by 6.3% for inland fish and 2.4% for marine fish. However, production performance varied widely across states. The study examines export performance in terms of growth, instability, and competitiveness, revealing variations across product groups and structural break periods since 1995. Although marine products exports show competitiveness according to revealed comparative advantage (RCA), this advantage has diminished over time. Granger causality analysis indicates a bidirectional causation between fish production and exports, emphasising the importance of comprehensive R&D and policy interventions along the value chain. The study underscores the critical role of enhancing production and value addition through favourable R&D and policies to sustainably boost fish production and its value.
Keywords: Fish production, Granger causality, Marine exports, Research and development policy, Structural breaks
Downloads
References
Aswathy, N., Narayanakumar, R. and Harshan, N. 2014. Marketing costs, margins and efficiency of domestic marine fish marketing in Kerala. Indian J. Fish., 61(2) : 97-107.
Bai, J. and Perron P. 2003. Computation and Analysis of Multiple Structural Change Models. J. Appl. Econom. 18 (1) : 1-22.
Balassa, B. 1965. Trade Liberalization and Revealed Comparative Advantage. Manch. Sch. Econ. Soc. Stud., 33 (2) : 99-124.
Barik, N. K. 2017. Freshwater fish for nutrition security in India: Evidence from FAO data. Aquac. Rep., 7 (2017) : 1-6.
Bavinck, M. 2001. Marine Resource Management: Conflict and Regulation in the Fisheries of the Coromandel Coast, Sage Publications India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 394 pp.
Belton, B. and Thilsted, S. H. 2014. Fisheries in transition: Food and nutrition security implications for the global South. Glob. Food Secur., 3 (1) : 59–66.
Darat, A. E. 1996. Trade and development: The Asian experience. Cato J., 6, (2,) : 695-699.
Engle, R. and Granger, C. 1991. Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing, ln Engle and Granger (eds.), Long Run Economic Readings in Cointegration. Oxford University Press, New York.
Fayaz, M. and Ahmed, M. 2020. Fisheries exports of India: A constant market share analysis. Indian Econ J., 68 (1) : 29 - 39.
FAO [Food and Agriculture Organization]. 2021. Fisheries Statistics, Available [On-line] : https://www.fao.org/fishery/en/statistics/software/fishstatj/en, Rome, Italy
FAO [Food and Agriculture Organization]. 2022. FAOSTAT. Available [On-line] https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, Rome, Italy.
Geetha, R., Ravisankar, T., Patil, P.K., Avunje, S., Vinoth, S., Sairam, C. V. and Vijayan, K. K. 2020. Trends, causes, and indices of import rejections in international shrimp trade with special reference to India: a 15-year longitudinal analysis. Aquac. Int. 28 (3) 1341-1369.
Gopal, S. T. K. and Edwin, L. 2013. Development of fishing industry in India. J.Aquat. Biol. Fish. 1 (1) : 38 - 53.
GOI [Government of India]. 2020. Handbook on Fisheries Statistics 2020, Department of Fisheries, Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying, New Delhi.
GOI [Government of India]. 2022. Export Import database, Director General of Commerce Intelligence and Statistics, New Delhi.
Granger, C.W.J. 1969. Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods, Econom. 37 (3) : 424-438.
Groger, J. P., Missong, M. and Rountree, R. A. 2011. Analyses of interventions and structural breaks in marine and fisheries time series: Detection of shifts using iterative methods. Ecol. Indicators., 11 (5) : 1084 to 1092.
Immanuel, J. J. and Narayanan, N. C. 2022. A brief history of blue revolution 2.0: Key drivers, actors and policies in the Indian context. Econ. Political Wkly., 57 (24): 1-2
IIPS [International Institute for Population Sciences]. 2017. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015-16, Mumbai, India.
Jayasankar, P. 2018. Present status of freshwater aquaculture in India - a review. Indian J. Fish. 65 (4) : 157-165.
Jayasekhar, S. and Kumar, C.N. 2010. Compliance, competitiveness and market access: A study on Indian seafood industry, Working Paper No. 422, Kerala: Centre for Development Studies. Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala.
Katiha, P. K., Jena, P. K., Pillai, N. G. K., Chakraborti, C. and Dey, M. M. 2005. Inland aquaculture in India: past trends, present status and future prospects. Aquac. Econ.Manag., 9 (1-2) : 237-264.
Krishnan, M. and Birthal, P. S. 2002. Aquaculture Development in India: An Economic Overview with Special Reference to Coastal Aquaculture. Aquac. Econ.Manag., 6 (1-2) : 81-96.
Kumar, A. 2004. Export performance of Indian fisheries: Strengths and challenges ahead. Econ. Political Wkly., 39 (38) : 4264-4270.
Kumar, B. G. 2008. Exploring market opportunity for fisheries sector in India, Report of The Research Study on Exploring Market Opportunity for Fisheries Sector in India, National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Reseach, New Delhi.
Kurien, J. 1985. Technical assistance projects and socio-economic change: Norwegian intervention in Kerala Fisheries Development. Econ. Political Wkly., 20 (25-26) : A70-A88.
McCarville, M. and Nadozie, E. 1995. Causality test of export-led growth: The case of Mexico. Atl. Econ. J., 23 (2) : 140-145.
Mohanty, B. P., Mahanty, A., Ganguly, S., Sankar, T. V., Chakraborty, K., Rangasamy, A., Paul, B., Sarma, D., Mathew, S., Asha, K. K. and Behera, B. 2014. Amino acid compositions of 27 food fishes and their importance in clinical nutrition. J. Amino Acids., 2014 (7) : 1-8.
Mohanty, B. P., Ganguly, S., Mahanty, A., Sankar, T. V., Anandan, R., Chakraborty, K., Paul, B. N., Sarma, D., Syama, J. D., Venkateshwarlu , G. and Mathew, S. 2016. DHA and EPA content and fatty acid profile of 39 food fishes from India. BioMed Res. Int., 2016 (14) : 1-14.
MPEDA [The Marine Products Export Development Authority]. 2022. Export-Import Statistics. Available [On-line] https://mpeda.gov.in/?page_id=438 [17th June 2022].
Nair, C. R. and Mohamed, S. K. 2015. Responsible Fisheries: Kerala Fish Workers Open New Path in Cogovernance. Econ. Political Wkly., 35 (29) : 16-18.
Navghan, M. and Kumar, N. R. 2017. An Empirical Assessment of Indian Seafood Export Performance and Competitiveness. Int. J. Pure Appl. Biosci., 5 (6) : 329-336.
Pillai, N. and Katiha, P. K. 2004. Evolution of fisheries and aquaculture in India, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi, 12 p.
Pomponio, X. Z. 1996. A causality analysis of growth and export performance. Atl. Econ. J., 24 (2) : 168-176.
Rajani, M. and Balasubramanian, A. 2020. Analysis of Structural Changes in the Production of Shrimp and Scampi from certain states of India. Int J Recent Sci Res. 11(08) : 39504-39508.
Rani, P., Immanuel, S. and Ranjan N. 2014. Ornamental fish exports from India: Performance, competitiveness and determinants. Int. J. Fish. Aquat. Stud., 1 (4) : 85-92.
Serin, V. and Civan A. 2008. Revealed Comparative Advantage and Competitiveness: A Case Study and Turkey towards the EU. J. Econ. Soc. Res. 10 (2) : 25-41.
Sharma, H. and Burark S. S. 2019. Status and growth in fish export from India. Indian J. Agric. Mark., 33 (3) : 69-82.
Shinoj, P., Kumar, B. G., Joshi, P. K. and Datta, K. K. 2009. Export of India’s fish and fishery products: analysing the changing pattern/composition and underlying causes. Indian J. Agric. Econ. 64 (4) : 541-556.
Silas, E. 2003. History and Development of Fisheries Research in India. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 100 (2-3) : 502–20.
Suresh, A. and Parappurathu, S. 2018. Capital formation in fisheries sector in India: trends, compositional changes and potential implications for sustainable development. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev. 31 (2018) : 111–122.
Suresh, A., Panda, S. K. and Chandrasekar, V. 2023. Export of fishery products from India: status, challenges and the way forward. Curr. Sci., 124 (6) : 664 to 670.
Thitamadee, S., Prachumwat, A., Srisala, J., Jaroenlak, P., Salachan, P. V., Sritunyalucksana, K., Flegel, T. W. and Itsathitphaisarn, O. 2016. Review of Current Disease Threats for Cultivated Penaeid Shrimp in Asia. Aquac., 452 (2016) : 69-87.
UNCTAD [United Nations Conference on Trade and Development]. 2022. Revealed comparative advantage (RCA). Available [On-line]https://unctadstat.unctad.org/en/RcaRadar.html#:~:text=Revealed%20comparative%20advantage%20(RCA)%20is,their%20relative%20differences%20in%20productivity [24th June 2022], United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Switzerland.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Indian Journal of Fisheries

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in Indian Journal of Fisheries vests with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, who has the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad engaged in reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information contained in these journals. The Council has no objection in using the material, provided the information is being utilized for academic purpose but not for commercial use. Due credit line should be given to the ICAR where information will be utilized.