Comparative effectiveness of public and private extension systems: An exploratory study in Uttar Pradesh, North India
50 / 26
Keywords:
Fish farmers, Public and Private extension system, EffectivenessAbstract
Extension services are crucial in the fisheries sector, helping to bridge knowledge gaps, facilitate access to essential resources and promote sustainable practices. While many studies focus on public extension systems, there is limited research comparing the effectiveness of both public and private extension systems. To address this knowledge gap, this research was conducted in Shravasti, Ayodhya and Azamgarh districts of Uttar Pradesh. A sample of 120 fish farmers were selected using stratified random sampling and effectiveness index (EI) was calculated using four indicators. The findings indicated that fish farmers’ change in awareness was the most significant factor with an index value of 0.81 for the effectiveness of the public extension system, whereas the extent of delivery was identified as the least contributing factor to the perceived effectiveness, with an index value of 0.59. With an index score of 0.85, the fish farmers’ change in yield and income has proven to be highly effective by private extension system. In terms of overall effectiveness, group means indicated that effectiveness of private extension systems (M=0.76) is significantly higher (p<0.05) than that of public extension systems (M=0.70). The study suggests publicprivate partnerships (PPPs) can significantly enhance support for fish farmers by combining the strengths of both sectors.
Keywords: Effectiveness index, Fish farmers, Knowledge gaps, Public-private partnerships
Downloads
References
Baiyegunhi, L. J. S., Majokweni, Z. P., and Ferrer, S. R. D. (2019). Impact of outsourced agricultural extension program on smallholder farmers’ net farm income in Msinga, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Technol. Soc., 57: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.11.003
Benson, A., and Jafry, T. 2013. The state of agricultural extension: An overview and new caveats for the future. J. Agric. Educ. Ext., 19(4): 381-393. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2013.808502
Chiru, T. D. G., Sharma, N., Padaria, R. N., Ahmad, N., Punitha, P., and Ramasubramanian, V. 2021. Effectiveness of Public and Private Extension Service Organization in Delivering Advisory Services in Meghalaya. J. Community Mobil. Sustain. Dev., 16(3): 681-687. http://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/73333
Christoplos, I. 2003. Common framework for supporting pro-poor extension. Neuchatel Group Publication, p. 1-24.
Department of Fisheries, Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry & Dairying, Government of India 2023. Annual report 2022-2023.
Devkota, K., Thapa, D., and Dhungana, H. 2016. Weak institutional interaction: Reason for poor agricultural extension services delivery in Nepal. New Angle Nepal J. Soc. Sci. Public Policy, 4(1): 88-103. https://doi.org/10.53037/na.v4i1.22
Farrington, J., and Deshingkar, P. 2003. Ensuring access to extension for women and vulnerable groups. South Asia, 6 (8).
Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry & Dairying, Government of India. 2022. Handbook of fisheries statistics 2022.
Mofya-Mukuka, R. and Kabisa, M., 2016. Analysis of indicators and measurement tools used in Zambia to assess impact of agricultural extension programs on gender equity and nutritionoutcomes. Work.Pap. http://www.aec.msu.edu/agecon/fs2/zambia/index.htm
Mukherjee, A., and Maity, A. 2015. Public–private partnership for convergence of extension services in Indian agriculture. Curr. Sci., 109(9): 1557-1563. http://dx.doi.org/10.18520/v109/i9/1557-1563
Pathak AK, Sarkar UK, Dayal R and Singh SP 2019. A freshwater fish diversity database of Uttar Pradesh, India. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 89(3): 347-354. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v89i3.88103
Quaye, W., Fuseini, M., Boadu, P., and Asafu-Adjaye, N. Y. 2019. Bridging the gender gap in agricultural development through gender responsive extension and rural advisory services delivery in Ghana. J. Gend. Stud., 28(2): 185-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1419941
Rivera, W. M., and Qamar, K. 2003. Agricultural Extension, Rural Development and the Food Security Challenge. Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), Rome, Italy, p. 1–90.
Shekara, P. C. 2001. Private extension in India: Myths, Realities, Apprehensions and Approaches. National Institute of Agricultural Extension Management, p. 1-152.
Singh, A.K. and Narain, S. 2016. Effectiveness of public and private extension system in delivering services. Indian Res. J. Ext. Educ., 8(3): 29-31.
Swanson, B. E. 1984. Agricultural extension: A reference manual. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Swanson, B. E., and Samy, M. M. (2002). Developing an extension partnership among public, private, and nongovernmental organizations. J. Int. Agric. Ext. Educ., 9(1): 5-10.
Sylla, A. Y., Mahama Al-Hassan, R., Egyir, I. S., and Anim-Somuah, H. 2019. Perceptions about quality of public and private agricultural extension in Africa: Evidence from farmers in Burkina Faso. Cogent Food Agric., 5(1): 1685861. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2019.1685861
Tigabu, D. G., and Gebeyehu, M. F. 2018. Agricultural extension service and technology adoption for food and nutrition security: Evidence from Ethiopia. FARA Research Report. 3(4): 30.
Umeh, O. J., Igwe, K. C., and Anyim, A. 2018. Farmers knowledge of the role of extension services in Akwa-Ibom State Nigeria. J. Agric. Ext., 22(3): 87-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jae.v22i3.9
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indian Journal of Fisheries

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in Indian Journal of Fisheries vests with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, who has the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad engaged in reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information contained in these journals. The Council has no objection in using the material, provided the information is being utilized for academic purpose but not for commercial use. Due credit line should be given to the ICAR where information will be utilized.