Marine species conservation awareness and community perceptions among tribal fishers of Car Nicobar, India


94 / 46

Authors

  • R Kiruba-Sankar Fisheries Science Division, Central Agricultural Research Institute (CARI), Post Box 181, Garacharma, Port Blair Andaman and Nicobar Islands - 744101
  • Sirisha Adamala
  • Murugesan SriHari
  • K Saravanan
  • J Praveenraj
  • Jessica Barman
  • Sonia

https://doi.org/10.21077/ijf.2026.73.2.174990-17

Keywords:

Car Nicobar, Marine Conservation , Community Awareness, traditional fishers , Stakeholder perceptions

Abstract

Understanding the perceptions, attitudes, and awareness levels of tribal fishers who interact daily with fragile marine ecosystems is vital, as these communities depend heavily on these resources for their livelihood and food security. Nicobarese fishers (n=195) from Car Nicobar Island in the Bay of Bengal were interviewed to assess their knowledge, awareness, and attitudes towards marine conservation, including perceptions of species protection, enforcement, community participation; threats to marine biodiversity and the sustainability of marine fauna. Awareness of conservation regulations was moderate, with 81% of respondents familiar with Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, and 72% supporting protected status for marine species, citing rarity and their restricted distribution as key reasons. However, institutional mechanisms were weak, 74% of respondents reported lack of tribal-level management plans, while 97% indicated that no formal legal framework for marine conservation existed within tribal councils. Nearly all respondents (97%) reported encountering rare marine species encountering during fishing activities, but their responses varied, with 44% releasing such speice back into the wild, and 27% consuming them. Perception scores reflected strong support for species conservation (4.02±0.68) and enforcement measures (3.97±0.62), although confidence in existing management practices and community consensus was only moderate. Generalised Linear Model (GLM) analysis revealed that age, fishing experience, and especially education were significant predictors of conservation awareness (p<0.05), whereas village-level variations were not significant. The findings emphasised a strong conservation commitment among Car Nicobar’s fishing communities, but also revealed weak institutional frameworks and community mechanisms. To better align conservation knowledge with sustainable marine resource management, it is crucial to strengthen environmental education, establish conservation regulations through tribal councils, and launch targeted awareness campaigns.

Keywords: Marine conservation, Socio-demographics,  Community awareness, Traditional fisheries, Stakeholder perceptions

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Sirisha Adamala

    Scientist, 

    National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Maharashtra

  • Murugesan SriHari

    Assistant Professor

    College of Fisheries, Tripura, Central Agricultural University

  • K Saravanan

    Senior Scientist

    ICAR Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture

  • J Praveenraj

    Scientist

    ICAR Central Island Agricultural Research Institute, Andaman and Nicobar Islands

  • Jessica Barman

    Researcher

    ICAR Central Island Agricultural Research Institute

     

  • Sonia

    Researcher

    ICAR Central Island Agricultural Research Institute, Andaman and Nicobar Islands

References

1. Abecasis, R. C., Schmidt, L., Longnecker, N. and Clifton, J. 2013. Implications of community and stakeholder perceptions of the marine environment and its conservation for MPA management in a small Azorean island. Ocean Coast Manage, 84 : 208–219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.08.009

2. Advani, S., Sridhar, A., Namboothri, N., Chandi, M. and Oommem, M. A. 2013. Emergence and transformation of marine fisheries in the Andaman Islands. Dakshin Foundation and ANET Publication, p. 29.

3. Berkes, F. and Nayak, P. K. 2018. Role of communities in fisheries management: “one would first need to imagine it”. Marit Stud, 17 : 241–251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-018-0120-x

4. Booth, H., Ramdlan, M. S., Hafizh, A., Wongsopatty, K., Mourato, S., Pienkowski, T., Adrinato, L. and Milner-Gulland, E. J. M. 2023. Designing locally-appropriate conservation incentives for small-scale fishers. Biol Conserv, 277 : 109821. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109821

5. Brun, V., Madarcos, J. R. V., Celis, A. J., Creencia, L. A., Gurney, G. G. and Claudet, J. 2024. Assessing stakeholder perceptions to guide social and ecological fit of marine protected areas. Science, 27(18) : 110952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.110952

6. Cinner, J. E., Huchery, C., MacNeil, M. A., Graham, N. A., McClanahan, T. R., Maina, J., Maire, E., Kittinger, J. N., Hicks, C. C., Mora, C. and Allison, E. H. 2016. Bright spots among the world’s coral reefs. Nature, 535(7612) : 416–419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18607

7. Cinner, J. E., Zamborain-Mason, J., Gurney, G. G., Graham, N. A., MacNeil, M. A., Hoey, A. S., Mora, C., Villéger, S., Maire, E., McClanahan, T. R. and Maina, J. M. 2020. Meeting fisheries, ecosystem function, and biodiversity goals in a human-dominated world. Science, 368(6488) : 307–311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax9412

8. Davis, A. and Jentoft, S. 2001. The challenge and the promise of indigenous peoples’ fishing rights—from dependency to agency. Mar Pol, 25(3) : 223–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-597X(01)00014-8

9. Demmler, R. A. and Stoll-Kleemann, S. 2025. Understanding public perceptions of marine threats: Awareness and concern among residents and visitors of the German Baltic Sea coast. Front Mar Sci, 12 : 1596331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2025.1596331

10. Dobson, A. J. and Barnett, A. 2018. An introduction to generalized linear models. 4th edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC.

11. Easman, E. S., Abernethy, K. E. and Godley, B. J. 2018. Assessing public awareness of marine environmental threats and conservation efforts. Mar Pol, 87 : 234–240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.030

12. El-Sabh, M., Demers, S. and Lafontaine, D. 1998. Coastal management and sustainable development: From Stockholm to Rimouski. Ocean Coast Manage, 39 : 1–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-5691(98)00009-X

13. Evans, L. S., Buchan, P. M., Fortnam, M., Honig, M. and Heaps, L. 2023. Putting coastal communities at the center of a sustainable blue economy: A review of risks, opportunities, and strategies. Front Mar Sci. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.1032204

14. FAO. 2015. Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-Scale Fisheries in the Context of Food Security and Poverty Eradication. FAO, Rome.

15. Fonner, R., Bellanger, M. and Warlick, A. 2020. Economic analysis for marine protected resources management: Challenges, tools, and opportunities. Ocean Coast Manage, 194 : 105222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105222

16. George, G., Krishnan, P., Kamal-Sarma, Kirubasankar, R., Goutham-Bharathi, M. P., Kaliyamoorthy, M., Krishnamurthy, V. and Kumar, T. S. 2011. Integrated potential fishing zone (IPFZ) forecasts: A promising information and communication technology tool for promoting green fishing in the islands. Indian J Agric Econ, 66(3) : 513–519.

17. George, G., Sarma, K., Bharathi, G., Kaliyamoorthy, M., Krishnan, P. and Kirubasankar, R. 2014. Efficacy of different modes in disseminating potential fishing zone (PFZ) forecasts: A case study from Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Indian J Fish, 61(1) : 84–87.

18. Gutierrez, N., Hilborn, R. and Defeo, O. 2011. Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries. Nature, 470 : 386–389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09689

19. Hamelin, K. M., Charles, A. T. and Bailey, M. 2024. Community knowledge as a cornerstone for fisheries management. Ecol Soc, 29(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-14552-290126

20. Hicks, C. C. and Cinner, J. E. 2014. Social, institutional, and knowledge mechanisms mediate diverse ecosystem service benefits from coral reefs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 111(50) : 17791–17796. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1413473111

21. Jefferson, R., McKinley, E., Capstick, S., Fletcher, S., Griffin, H. and Milanese, M. 2015. Understanding audiences: Making public perceptions research matter to marine conservation. Ocean Coast Manage, 115 : 61–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.06.014

22. Jentoft, S. 1989. Fisheries co-management: Delegating government responsibility to fishermen's organizations. Mar Pol, 13(2) : 137–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-597X(89)90004-3

23. Jentoft, S. and Chuenpagdee, R. 2009. Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem. Mar Pol, 33(4) : 553–560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2008.12.002

24. Jentoft, S., McCay, B. J. and Wilson, D. C. 1998. Social theory and fisheries co-management. Mar Pol, 22(4–5) : 423–436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-597X(97)00040-7

25. Jentoft, S., van Son, T. C. and Bjorkan, M. 2007. Marine protected areas: A governance system analysis. Hum Ecol, 35 : 611–622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-007-9125-6

26. Johannes, R. E. 2002. The renaissance of community-based marine resource management in Oceania. Annu Rev Ecol Syst, 33(1) : 317–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150524

27. Jupiter, S. D., Cohen, P. J., Weeks, R., Tawake, A. and Govan, H. 2014. Locally-managed marine areas: Multiple objectives and diverse strategies. Pac Conserv Biol, 20(2) : 165–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/PC140165

28. Kiruba-Sankar, R., Adamala, S., Barman, J., Saravanan, K., Praveenraj, J., Yuvaraj, E., Kumar, G. and Ahmed, S. Z. 2023b. Aboriginal tribes’ knowledge of the endangered freshwater turtle Cuora amboinensis from Car Nicobar, a remote oceanic island in the Bay of Bengal. Fishes, 8(10) : 517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes8100517

29. Kiruba-Sankar, R., Krishnan, P., George, G., Kumar, K. L., Angel, J. R. J., Saravanan, K. and Roy, S. D. 2021. Fisheries governance in the tropical archipelago of Andaman and Nicobar—opinions and strategies for sustainable management. J Coast Conserv. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-021-00808-5

30. Kiruba-Sankar, R., Kumar, K. L., Angel, J. R. J., Salim, S. S., Saravanan, K., Krishnan, P., Ravikumar, T. and Roy, S. D. 2020. Impact evaluation of marine fisheries interventions among tribal fisher commune of Car Nicobar Island, India. J Mar Biol Ass India, 62(1) : 84–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6024/jmbai.2020.62.1.2065-11

31. Kiruba-Sankar, R., Kumar, K. L., Saravanan, K. and Praveenraj, J. 2019. Poaching in Andaman and Nicobar coasts: Insights. J Coast Conserv, 23 : 95–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-018-0640-y

32. Kirubasankar, R., Roy, S. D., Grinson-George, S. K., Krishnan, P., Kumar, S. R., Kaliyamoorthy, M. and Goutham-Bharathi, M. P. 2013. Fishery and exploitation of Epinephelus malabaricus from Andaman Islands. Asian Fish Sci, 26 : 167–175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33997/j.afs.2013.26.3.004

33. Kiruba-Sankar, R., Saravanan, K., Adamala, S., Selvam, K., Kumar, K. L. and Praveenraj, J. 2023a. First report of marine debris in Car Nicobar, a remote oceanic island in the Nicobar archipelago, Bay of Bengal. Reg Stud Mar Sci. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2023.102845

34. Krishnan, P., George, G., Vikas, N., Immanuel, T., Goutham-Bharathi, M. P., Anand, A., Kumar, K. V. and Kumar, S. S. 2012. Tropical storm off Myanmar coast sweeps reefs in Ritchie’s archipelago, Andaman. Environ Monit Assess, 185(6) : 5327–5338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-012-2948-7

35. Krishnan, P., Roy, S. D., George, G., Anand, A., Murugesan, S., Kaliyamurthy, M., Vikas, N. and Soundararajan, R. 2011. Elevated sea surface temperature induces mass bleaching of corals in Andaman. Curr Sci, 100(12) : 1800–1804.

36. Kurien, J. 1998. Traditional ecological knowledge and coastal sustainability: New meaning to Asian coastal proverbs. Ecol Appl, 8(S2) : 2–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2641358

37. Levine, A. S., Richmond, L. and Lopez-Carr, D. 2015. Marine resource management: Culture, livelihoods, and governance. Appl Geogr, 59 : 56–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.01.016

38. Lukambagire, I., Matovu, B., Manianga, A. and Bhavani, R. R. 2024. Towards a collaborative stakeholder engagement pathway to increase ocean sustainability related to marine spatial planning in developing coastal states. Environ Challenges, 15 : 100954. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2024.100954

39. Morf, A., Moodie, J., Gee, K., Giacometti, A., Kull, M., Piwowarczyk, J., Schiele, K., Zaucha, J., Kellecioglu, I., Luttmann, A. and Strand, H. 2019. Towards sustainability of marine governance: Challenges and enablers for stakeholder integration in transboundary marine spatial planning in the Baltic Sea. Ocean Coast Manage, 177 : 200–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.04.009

40. Nguyen, M., Duong, M. T., Nguyen, M., Mutai, N., Jin, R., Nguyen, P., Le, T. and Vuong, Q. 2023. Promoting stakeholders’ support for marine protection policies: Insights from a 42-country dataset. Sustainability, 15(16) : 12226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612226

41. Oliveira, J. M., Sa, R., Correia, M. and Silva, G. 2025. Investigating stakeholders’ perceptions regarding seahorses’ conservation and conflicts in a European estuarine environment. Reg Stud Mar Sci, 89 : 104283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2025.104283

42. Patankar, V. J. 2019. Attitude, perception and awareness of stakeholders towards the protected marine species in the Andaman Islands. Ocean Coast Manage, 179 : 104830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.104830

43. Patankar, V., D’Souza, E., Alcoverro, T. and Arthur, R. 2016. For traditional island communities in the Nicobar archipelago, complete no-go areas are the most effective form of marine management. Ocean Coast Manage, 133 : 53–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.09.003

44. Proulx, M., Ross, L., Macdonald, C., Fitzsimmons, S. and Smit, M. 2021. Indigenous traditional ecological knowledge and ocean observing: A review of successful partnerships. Front Mar Sci. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.703938

45. R Core Team. 2025. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.

46. Ravikumar, T., Krishnan, P., Ram, N., Sankar, R. K., Roy, S. D., Ahmed, S. K. Z. and Neethiselvan, N. 2015. Hodi, a traditional craft of Nicobari tribe. Ind J Tradit Knowl, 14(1) : 161–168.

47. Ravikumar, T., Ram, N., Krishnan, P., Sankar, R. K., Sachithanandam, V. and Roy, S. D. 2016. Subsistence fishing methods of Nicobari tribes using traditional knowledge. J Mar Island Cultures, 5 : 79–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imic.2016.05.002

48. Relano, V., Mak, T., Ortiz, S. and Pauly, D. 2022. Stakeholder perceptions can distinguish ‘paper parks’ from marine protected areas. Sustainability, 14(15) : 9655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159655

49. Roy, S. D. and George, G. 2010. Marine resources of islands: Status and approaches for sustainable exploitation/conservation with special emphasis to Andaman and Nicobar. Indian J Anim Sci, 80(4) : 57–62.

50. Roy, S. D., Krishnan, P., Patro, S., George, G., Velmurugan, A., Sankar, R. K. and Ramachandran, P. 2017a. Wetlands of small island nations in South Asia vis-à-vis the mainland and island groups in India. In: BAK, P. (Ed.), Wetland Science: Perspective from South Asia, pp. 31–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3715-0_2

51. Roy, S. D., Krishnan, P., Velmurugan, A., Anand, A., George, G., Sankar, R. K. and Swarnam, T. P. 2017b. Wetlands of tropical islands under changing climate: A case from Nicobar group of islands, India. In: BAK, P. (Ed.), Wetland Science: Perspective from South Asia, pp. 205–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3715-0_11

52. Roy, S. D. and Krishnan, P. 2005. Mangrove stands of Andaman vis-à-vis tsunami. Curr Sci, 89 : 1800–1804.

53. Seaside Sustainability. 2023. The role of coastal communities in ocean sustainability. Seaside Sustainability.

54. Stori, F. T., Peres, C. M., Turra, A. and Pressey, R. L. 2019. Traditional ecological knowledge supports ecosystem-based management in disturbed coastal marine social-ecological systems. Front Mar Sci, 6 : 571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00571

55. Veitayaki, J. 2008. Traditional and community-based marine resources management system in Fiji: An evolving integrated process. Coast Manage, 26 : 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08920759809362342

56. Wooton, N., Nursey-Bray, M., Holland, S. and Gillanders, B. M. 2024. Better understanding ocean awareness: Insights from young people. Mar Pol, 164 : 106159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106159

57. Yanda, P. Z., Mwajombe, A. R. and Gwambene, B. 2023. Coastal communities’ livelihoods conditioned by resource use dynamics and changing environments in Lindi Region, south-eastern Tanzania. Mar Pol, 150 : 105532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105532

58. Yuvaraj, E., Dharanirajan, K., Narshimulu, S. and Narshimulu, G. 2015. Post disaster assessment of impact of cyclone Lehar in South Andaman Island. Curr Sci, 108 : 85–89.

Downloads

Submitted

2026-01-07

Published

2026-06-30

Issue

Vol. 73 No. 2 (2026)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Indian Journal of Fisheries

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The copyright of the articles published in Indian Journal of Fisheries vests with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, who has the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad engaged in reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information contained in these journals. The Council has no objection in using the material, provided the information is being utilized for academic purpose but not for commercial use. Due credit line should be given to the ICAR where information will be utilized.

How to Cite

R Kiruba-Sankar, Sirisha Adamala, Murugesan SriHari, K Saravanan, J Praveenraj, Jessica Barman, & Sonia. (2026). Marine species conservation awareness and community perceptions among tribal fishers of Car Nicobar, India. Indian Journal of Fisheries, 73(2). https://doi.org/10.21077/ijf.2026.73.2.174990-17
Citation
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC