Impact of Traditional and Sustainable Processing Methods on the Mineral and Antinutrient Composition of Biofortified Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum) Cultivarss
0 / 2
Keywords:
Bioavailability, Germination, Iron, Millet, Soaking, ZincAbstract
The study aims to investigate the mineral and antinutritional properties of biofortified pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.]
varieties. Pearl millet contains antinutrients such as phytate and phenols, which reduce the bioavailability of micronutrients like zinc
and iron, despite its decent nutritional composition. Thus, it is necessary to increase bioavailability through processing, which also
improves the grain's nutritional profile and can be utilised to mitigate micronutrient deficiencies, the main dietary issue facing the
world today. The mean iron, zinc, calcium, phytate, phenol, and tannin contents were 6.60, 3.42, 28.43, 486.83, 346.00, and 171.09
mg/100 g. Dhanshakti has shown significantly (P<0.05) high iron content (8.66 mg/100 g), the lowest phytate (P<0.01) and phenol
content (P<0.001) of 560.56 mg/100 g and 298.94 mg/100 g, respectively, compared to other varieties studied. RHB 234 has a low tannin content of 145.45 mg/100 g (P<0.001). After being soaked and germinated, grains have decreased minerals and phytate, while
increases in phenols and tannins were observed. Therefore, traditional processing may reduce the quantity of both minerals and
antinutrients, but it may also boost the bioavailability of the minerals because it reduces the amount of phytate, a key antinutrient that
lowers the bioavailability of vital minerals like iron and zinc.
Downloads
References
Abdelrahaman SM, HB Elmaki, WH Idris, AB Hassan, EE Babiker and A H El Tinay (2007) Antinutritional factor content and hydrochloric acid extractability of minerals in pearl millet cultivars as affected by germination. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 58(1): 6-17.
Ahmed SB, SA Mahgoub and BE Babiker (1996) Changes in tannin and cyanide contents and diastatic activity during germination and the effect of traditional processing on cyanide content of sorghum cultivars. Food Chem. 56(2): 159-162.
AOAC (1980) Official Methods of Analysis, 13th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.
Bansal T and A Kawatra (2020) Optimization of traditional snack for children, by using bio-fortified pearl millet, carrot and sesame for its formulation. Eur. J. Nutr. Food Saf. 21(8): 107-115.
Bello FA (2017) Effect of alkaline steeping on the nutritional, antinutritional and functional properties of malted millet (Pennisetum glaucum) flour. Int. J. Innov. Food Nutr. Sustain. Agric. 5: 17-23.
Choudhary C, S Vignesh, DV Chidanand and N Baskaran (2023) Effect of different processing methods on nutritional composition and microbial quality of pearl millet. Res. Sq. (1): 1-23.
Cyerin Priya S, M Reddy and KC Chandana (2023) Physico, chemical and functional properties of different millets and their suitability for preparation of enhanced nutritious laddu. J Clin Biomed Sci. 13(4): 115-121.
Deevi KC, N Swamikannu, PR Pingali and MK Gumma (2024) Current trends and future prospects in global production, utilization, and trade of pearl millet. In: Tonapi VA, Thirunavukkarasu N, Gupta S, Gangashetty PI and Yadav O (eds) Pearl Millet in the 21st Century. Springer, Singapore.
Gupta V, AP Singh and N Gupta (2022) Importance of pearl millet and its health benefits. just agriculture e-newsletter. 2(8).
Hemanth S, SP Singh, T Singhal, S Yadav, C Kapoor, A Naveen and HA Bhargavi (2025) Nutrient dynamics in pearl millet; impact of seed soaking on minerals and anti-nutrient contents. J. Cereal Sci: 104252.
Hithamani G and K Srinivasan (2014) Effect of domestic processing on the polyphenol content and bioaccessibility in finger millet (Eleusine coracana) and pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum). Food Chem. 164: 55-62.
Ishwarya ALM and A Narayanan (2016) Effect of germination on biofortified pearl millet cultivars' nutrient content. Int. J. Innov. Res. Educ. Sci. 3(6): 2349-5219.
Kumar A, A Kaur, K Gupta, Y Gat and V Kumar (2021) Assessment of germination time of finger millet for value addition in functional foods. Curr. Sci.120(2): 406.
Kumar RR, T Vinutha, S Goswami, A Dahuja and A Tyagi (2022) Pearl Millet-The Pearl of Indian Agriculture for Developing Smart Food for the Future, 1-24 p.
Lestienne IP, B Besançon Caporiccio, V Lullien-Péllerin and S Tréche (2005) Iron and zinc in vitro availability in pearl millet flours (Pennisetum glaucum) with varying phytate, tannin, and fibre contents. J. Agric. Food Chem. 53(8): 3240-3247.
Murcia MA, AM Vera, TA Martinez and G Ortiz (1999) Fast determination of the Ca, Mg, K, Na and Zn contents in milk and non-dairy imitation milk using ICP-OES without mineralization stage. Lebens. Wiss. Technol. 32: 175-179.
Pushparaj FS and A Urooj (2011) Influence of processing on dietary fibre, tannin and in vitro protein digestibility of pearl millet. Food Nutr. Sci.2(8): 895-900.
Saharan K, N Khetarpaul and S Bishnoi (2001) HCl extractability of minerals from ricebean and fababean; influence of domestic processing methods. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2: 323-325.
Samtiya M, K Soni, S Chawla, A Poonia, S Sehgal and T Dhewa (2021) Key anti-nutrients of millet and their reduction strategies; an overview. Acta Sci. Nutr. Health. 5(12).
Sara NH and O Valérie (2016) Malting process optimization for protein digestibility enhancement in finger millet grain. J. Food Sci. Technol. 53(4): 1929-193.
Selladurai M, MK Pulivarthi, AS Raj, M Iftikhar, PV Prasad and K Siliveru (2022) Considerations for gluten free foods-pearl and finger millet processing and market demand. Grain Oil Sci. Technol.6(2): 59-70.
Sharma S and GA Anurag (2023) Effect of germination on the physicochemical and anti-nutritional properties of finger millet (Eleusine coracana), pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum), and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). J. Pharma Innov. 12(3): 4763-4772.
Sharma S, DC Saxena and CS Riar (2016) Analysing the effect of germination on phenolics, dietary fibres, minerals and γamino butyric acid contents of barnyard millet (Echinochloa frumentaceae). Food Biosci.13: 60-68.
Singhal T, CT Satyavathi, SP Singh, M Mallik, SM Sankar and C Bharadwaj (2022) Mapping and identification of quantitative trait loci controlling test weight and seed yield of pearl millet in multi agro-climatic zones of India. Field Crops Res. 288: 108701.
Singleton MA, U Ravi and MAN Lakshmi (1999) Formulation and quality assessment of instant dhokla mix with incorporation of pumpkin flour. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 69: 956-960.
Sokrab AM, IAM Ahmed and EE Babiker (2012) Effect of germination on antinutritional factors, total, and extractable minerals of high and low phytate corn (Zea mays L.) genotypes. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 11(2): 123-128.
Thorat AS, S Rawool, A Ajbani, S Salvi, PS Ghugre and E Boy (2017) Effect of processing on total iron and zinc, ionizable iron, extractable zinc, phytate and phytate; mineral ratios in pearl millet. Adv. Food Sci. Eng. 1: 129-143.
Wheeler EL and RE Ferrel (1971) A method for phytic acid determination in wheat and wheat fraction. Cereal Chem. 48: 312.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors are required to submite copyright certificate in original.