Logit analysis for the entry of farmers into contract Japanese quail  farming

K. Chitrambigai; A. Serma Saravan Pandian

doi:10.56093/ijvasr.v49i1.132143

Authors

K. Chitrambigai Assistant Professor, Department of Food Business Management College of Food and Dairy Technology, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Koduveli, Chennai
A. Serma Saravan Pandian Associate Professor, Department of Animal Husbandry Economics, Madras Veterinary College, TANUVAS, Chennai

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijvasr.v49i1.132143

Keywords:

Contract Japanese quail farming, Logit model, Farm size, Profitability, Investment

Abstract

The present study was undertaken to analyze the factors determining the participation of farmers in contract Japanese quail farming. The primary data for the study was collected through a pre-tested interview schedule. The determinant factors for farmers participation in contract Japanese quail farming were assessed by the logit model and the results of the analysis revealed that the farm size and profitability were found to be the positive determinant factors and investment was found to be a negative determinant factor for the participation of farmers in contract Japanese quail farming.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arya, K., Gupta, R and Saxena, V. L. (2018). Quail Survey: Elaborative Information and its Prospects. Research Journal of Life Sciences, Bioinformatics, Pharmaceutical and Chemical Sciences, 4(4) :197-209

Mishra, A. K., Kumar, A., Joshi and Souza, A. D (2018).Cooperatives, contract farming, and farm size: The case of tomato producers in Nepal. Agri business — An International Journal, 34 (4):865-886

Begum, I. and Alum, M. J. (2005). Contract farming and small farmers: A case study of the Bangladesh poultry sector. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Economics.7 (2):40-51.

Nagaraj, N., Chandrakanth, M. G., Chengappa, P. G., Roopa, H. S and Chandakavate, P. M. (2008). Contract farming and its implications for input-supply, linkages between market and farmers in Karnataka. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 21(8):307-316.