BREEDING VALUE ESTIMATION USING TEST DAY RECORDS IN MURRAH GRADED BUFFALOES


48 / 55

Authors

  • Bhumit K Patel Veterinary Executive, Mahi Milk Producer Company, Rajkot
  • Ashish C Patel Department of Animal Genetics & Breeding, College of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry, A.A.U., Anand – 388001
  • S B Patel Research Scientist, Amul Research and Development Association, Amul Dairy, Anand- 388 001
  • R. S. Joshi Department of Animal Genetics & Breeding, College of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry, A.A.U., Anand – 388 001
  • D N Rank Research Scientist, Amul Research and Development Association, Amul Dairy, Anand-388001

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijvasr.v45i2.153368

Keywords:

Murrah graded buffalo, TDMY, TDFY, AIREML, RR

Abstract

The present study was carried out using test day yield for sire evaluation in Murrahgraded buffalo. A total of 2329 test day lactation records of daughters of 79 sires distributed in 47 villages under field progeny testing programme in Anand milk shed area were utilized. The objective of the study was to estimate the breeding value of sires and to compare various methods of sire evaluation viz. simple daughter’s average (D), contemporary comparison (CC), leastsquares (LS), best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP), average information restricted maximum likelihood (AIREML) and random regression (RR) for Predicted First Lactation Yield for 305 day (PFLY305 day) and Test day records of Murrah graded buffaloes in terms of accuracy and efficiency. For PFLY305 and Test Day Milk Yield (TDMY) estimates, AIREML and RR methods were found to have minimum error variance respectively and therefore, found most efficient. LS and BLUP methods had equal error variance for PFLY305. For 305 day fat per cent and Test Day Fat Per cent (TDFP) estimates, the AIREML and RR methods with minimum error variance respectively were found to be most efficient methods. For PFLY305 and TDMY, the rank correlations of D, CC, LS, BLUP, AIREML and most efficient RR methods were 0.47, 0.12, 0.34, 0.47 and 0.16, respectively. All the methods are expected to rank sires with fairly high accuracy. For 305 day fat per cent and TDFP, the rank correlations of D, CC, LS, BLUP, AIREML with most efficient RR methods were 0.14, 0.17, 0.06, 0.03 and 0.12, respectively. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonymous, (2012). Report of the Working Group on Animal Husbandry and Dairying. 12th Five Year Plan.

Banik, S. and Gandhi, R. S. (2006). Animal model versus conventional methods of sire evaluation in Sahiwal cattle. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Sciences, 19(9): 1225-1228.

Chaudhari, P. N. (2013). Comparison of various methods for sire evaluation in murrah graded buffaloes. M.V.Sc Thesis submitted to the Anand Agricultural University, Anand.

Dixit, S. P. and Sadana, D. K. (1999). Response to single trait selection in open nucleus breeding schemes for buffalo breeding. Indian Journal of Dairy Science, 52: 17-22.

Duanjinda, M., Misztal, I. and Tsuruta, S. (2007). BLUPF90 Dairy PAK Version 3. Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

Edwards, J. (1932). The progeny test a method of evaluating the dairy sires. Journal of Agricultural Science., 22: 811-837.

Haile, A., Joshi, B. K., Ayalew, W. Tegegne, A., Singh, A. and Chakravarty, A. K. (2010). Comparison of sire evaluation methods in Holstein Friesian in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 80 (12) : 1194–97

Harvey, W. R. (1987). Least-squares analysis of data with unequal subclass numbers. ARS H-4, USDA, Washington D. C. ICAR – International Committee for Animal Recording (2012): Guidelines approved by the general assembly held in Riga, Latvia on June 2010. (http://www. icar.org/ documents/ rulesper cent 20andper cent 20regulations/ guidelines/guidelines_2012.pdf).

Jain, J. P. and Malhotra, J. C. (1971). Comparative study of different methods of indexing sires. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 41: 1101-1108.

Kaygisiz, A. (2013). Estimation of genetic parameters and breeding values for dairy cattle using test-day milk yield records. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 23(2): 345-349.

Madson, P. and Jensen J. (2013). DMU Version 6,release 5.2 http://dmu.agrsci.dk/DMU/Doc/Current/dmuv6_guide .5.2.pdf.

Mrode, R. A. and Thompson, R. (2005): Linear models for the prediction of animal breeding value, Second edition, CABI publication. Mukherjee, S., Joshi, B. K. and Gaur, G. K. (2007). Comparison of sire evaluation methods in Frieswal cattle. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 77(8): 773-776.

Ptack, E. and L.R. Schaeffer, 1993. Use of test day yields for genetic evaluation of dairy sires and cows. Livestock Production Science, 34:23-34.

Raja, T. V. and Gandhi, R. S. (2012).Comparison of different methods of sire evaluation in Sahiwal cattle. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 82(5): 530–532.

Singh, S. and Tailor, S. P. (2013). Prediction of 305 day first lactation milk yield from fortnightly test and part yields. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 83 (2): 166– 169.

Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. (1960). Principles and Procedures of Statistics with Special Reference to the Biological Sciences. McGrew Hill Book Company Inc. New York: 550.

Thompson, R., Brotherstone, S. and White, I. M. S. (2005). Estimation of quantitative genetic parameters. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 360(1459):1469-1477.

Downloads

Submitted

03-07-2024

Published

19-11-2025

Issue

Section

Full Length Articles

How to Cite

Bhumit K Patel, Ashish C Patel, S B Patel, R. S. Joshi, & D N Rank. (2025). BREEDING VALUE ESTIMATION USING TEST DAY RECORDS IN MURRAH GRADED BUFFALOES. Indian Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Research, 45(2), 574-580. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijvasr.v45i2.153368
Citation