Comparison of Simpler Radiation-Based ET Models with Penman Monteith model for Humid Region


80 / 14

Authors

  • D Jhajharia Lecturer, Deptt. of Agric. Engg., NERIST, Nirjuli, (Itanagar), Arunachal Pradesh
  • S Deb Berma U. G. Student, Deptt. of Agric. Engg., NERIST, Nirjuli, (Itanagar), Arunachal Pradesh
  • G Agrawal Assistant Engineer, Dept. of Agriculture and Rural Development, Consulting Engineering Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. 57, Nehru Place, New Delhi

Abstract

The three relatively simpler radiation-based models: Turc, Jensen-Haise and Priestley-Taylor were used to estimate reference evapotranspiration (ET0) at different humid locations of Assam, India. The Penman-Monteith model was selected as the standard for evaluating the performance of the other three radiation-based models. The averaged monthly meteorological data were used for estimating the ET0. Good correlation was found between ET0 values estimated by each of the three radiation-based models. The least and the highest values of RMSE varied between 0.16 (Gohpur) and 0.82 (Dhubri) for Priestley-Taylor model; 0.95 (Dhubri) and 1.68 (Silicorie) for Turc model; and 1.89 (Dhubri) and 2.97 (Silicorie) for lensen-Haise model. The study revealed that among all the three radiation-based models, the Priestley-Taylor model yielded average estimate of ET0 closest to the Penman-Monteith model.

Downloads

Submitted

2012-01-12

Published

2004-12-05

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Jhajharia, D., Berma, S. D., & Agrawal, G. (2004). Comparison of Simpler Radiation-Based ET Models with Penman Monteith model for Humid Region. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 41(4). https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/JAE/article/view/14717