Extension Approaches Adopted by the Agri-allied Sector Departments of Karnataka State
170 / 109
Abstract
The extension approaches followed by different extension organizations have resulted into wider spread of modern technologies and increase in agricultural production. However, in the agri-allied sector these extension approaches are not fully adopted due to several reasons.It has been seen that majority (85%) of the animal husbandry officers in Karnataka visited the farmers field daily, followed by sericulture officers (60%) and 50 per cent of horticulture officers and fisheries officers. Nearly 45 per cent of the horticulture officers, 40 per cent of the sericulture and fisheries officers and 10 per cent of the animal husbandry officers were involved in formation of farmer groups. General Extension Approach was the most popular among the agri-allied sector officers. It has been noticed that 90 per cent of horticulture officers, 85 per cent of animal husbandry officers and 70 per cent of the sericulture and fisheries officers were aware of the Agricultural Technology Management Agency (ATMA). However most of them; viz., 70 per cent of the sericulture officers, 50 per cent of the fisheries officers, 65 per cent of both animal husbandry and horticulture officers had no knowledge about the key functions of ATMA. Cent per cent of all the department officers in Karnataka stated that extension services were not system based and not converged with the other line departments. None of the officers recommended any farming systems to the farmers. Participatory approach
and ICT approach were not much practiced by the allied sector officers as only 25 per cent were affirmative about the details of the participatory approach. Commodity approach and project approach of extension were least popular with the agri-allied officers of Karnataka State. Thus, it can be concluded that to promote adoption of other extension approaches among the agri-allied department officers, capacity building through induction training and refresher training programs on extension management aspects and well defined job chart inclusive of frequent field visits is the need of the hour for Karnataka State.
References
Axinn, G.H. (1988) A Book entitled “Guide on alternative extension approaches- Agricultural Education and Extension Services. Human Resources Institutions and Agrarian Reform Division. FAO, Rome, Italy.
GoI, Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries. Annual Report 2017-18, available at; http://www.dahd.nic.in/documents/reportsGoI, Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying. http://dahd.nic.in/
Govt. of Karnataka. Karnataka Agriculture & Rural Development Vision 2020, Mission Group on Agriculture and Rural Development, Planning Board Government of Karnataka, Bangalore
available athttps://www.karnataka.gov.in/spb/Reports/Karnataka Agriculture Rural Development Vision2010.pdf
The Hindu (2015), Indian silk industry hopes to become self-reliant by 2020. By Shankar Bennur updated November 17, 2015. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/indiansilk-
industry-hopes-to-become-selfreliant-by-2020/article7885584.ece
National Horticulture Board(NHB) http://nhb.gov.in/Default.aspx
Sulaiman Rasheed V and A W Van Den Ban (2003). Funding and delivering agricultural extension in India. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education 10, 1, 21-30.
Times of India (2017). Horticulture production in India estimated at record 295 million tonnes in 2016-17, by Vishwa Mohan updated May 30, 2017. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/58913722.cms?utm_source= contentofinterest&utm_ medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst