Development of Selection Index for Agroforestry Systems
90 / 125
Keywords:
Agroforestry system productivity index; Crop, Kruskal-Wallis, Tree, Weightage parameter.Abstract
Agroforestry systems involving both tree and crop components usually produce multiple outputs which should all be considered in evaluating the productivity of a system. The problem of multiple outputs arising from tree and crop components can be tackled by developing an index that synthesizes these components into a single value. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a new selection index called Agroforestry System Productivity Index (ASPI) that can be used for easy assessment and comparison of agroforestry systems. The ASPI may be defined as a sum of the relative proportions of the equivalently scaled yields or products of tree and crop components of an agroforestry system. ASPI scores are calculated by converting the outputs of an agroforestry system to a common scale and then ranking the proportions of the converted values for each year of production. The index is shown to be reliable in ranking agroforestry systems and therefore recommended for use in comparing different agroforestry systems involving tree-crop components.
Downloads
References
Amanullah, Khan, F., Muhammad, H., Jan, A.U. and Ali, G. (2016). Land equivalent ratio, growth, yield and yield components response of mono-cropped vs. inter-cropped common bean and maize with and without compost application. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, 7(2), 40-49. doi:10.5251/abjna.2016.7.2.40.49
Atabo, J.A. and Umaru, T.M. (2015). Assessing the land equivalent ratio (LER) and stability of yield of two cultivars of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)-soyabean (Glycine max L. Merr) to row intercropping system. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, 5(18), 144-149.
Birteeb, P.T., Varghese C., Jaggi, S., Harun, M. and Varghese E. (2020a). Tree Network-balanced Designs for Agroforestry Trials. Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, 74(3), 243-254.
Birteeb, P.T., Varghese, C., Jaggi, S., Varghese, E. and Harun, M. (2020b). An efficient class of tree network balanced designs for agroforestry experimentation. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 51(12), 7169-7179. doi:10.1080/03610918.2020.1825739
Brintha, I. and Seran, T.H. (2009). Effect of paired row planting of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) intercropped with vegetable amaranthus (Amaranthus tricolor L.) on yield components of radish in sandy regosol. The Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4(1), 19-28.
Dariush, M., Ahad, M. and Meysam, O. (2006). Assessing the land equivalent ratio (LER) of two corn [Zea mays L.] varieties intercropping at various nitrogen levels in Karaj, Iran. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 7, 359-364.
de Wit, C.T. and Van der Bergh, J.P. (1965). Competition between herbage plants. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science, 13, 212-221.
Golicz, K., Piepho, H.P., Minarsch, E.M.L, Niether, W., Große Stoltenberg, A., Oldeland, J., Breuer, L., Gattinger, A. and Jacobs, S. (2023). Highlighting the potential of multilevel statistical models for analysis of individual agroforestry systems. Agroforestry Systems, 97, 1481-1489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00871-x
Jaggi, S., Handa, D.P., Gill, A.S. and Singh, N.P. (2004). Land equivalent ratio for assessing yield advantages from agroforestry experiments. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 74(2), 76-79.
Kermani, W.A. (1980). Developing multiple use silvicultural practices for forestry of arid regions. Proceedings of IUFRO/MAB Conference, Research on Multiple Use of Forest Resources, Flag Staff, Arizona.
Koutra, V., Gilmour, S.G., Parker, B.M. and Mead, A. (2023). Design of agricultural field experiments accounting for both complex blocking structures and network effects. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 28, 526-548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-023-00544-3
Kruskal, W.H. and Wallis, W.A. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47, 583-621.
Metwally, A.A., Safina, S.A. and Noaman, A.H. (2015). Yield and land equivalent ratio of intercropping maize with Egyptian cotton. Journal of Agri-Food and Applied Sciences, 3(4), 85-93.
Morales-Rosales, E.J. and Franco-Mora, O. (2009). Biomass, yield and land equivalent ratio of Helianthus annus L. in sole crop and intercropped with Phaseolus vulgaris L. in high valleys of Mexico. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 10, 431-439.
Mukoobwa, D., Zaninka, B. and Mugunga, C. P. (2023). The Assessment of Agroforestry Practices in Mukura Sector, Huye District, Southern Rwanda. International Journal of Forestry Research, 2023, Article ID 2288114, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2288114
Oyejola, B.A. and Mead, R. (1982). Statistical assessment of different ways of calculating land equivalent ratios (LER). Experimental Agriculture, 18, 125-138.
Ranasinghe, O.M.S.H.K. and Mayhead, G.J. (1990). The effect of intercropping Populus ‘RAP’ with beans. Forestry, 63(3), 271-277.
Riley (1989). The assessment of the stability of agroforestry systems. World Agroforestry Centre: Meteorology and Agroforestry. https://apps.worldagroforestry.org/Units/Library/Books/Book%2077/meteorology%20and%20agroforestry/html/assessment_stability.htm?n=18
Sebetha, E. (2019). Maize field biomass yield and land equivalent ratio under influence of different management practices and location. Asian Journal of Crop Science, 11, 25-31.
Singh, M. (1989). Estimation of land equivalent ratios. Journal of Applied Statistics, 16(3), 363–371. doi:10.1080/02664768900000044
Szάsz, K. (1987). An index of relative crop yields. Journal of Official Statistics, 3(2), 183-190.
Willey, R.W. (1979). Intercropping–its importance and research needs. Parts I and II. Field Crop Abstracts, 32, 1-10 and 73-85.