Assessment of genetic diversity in chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.)


108 / 181

Authors

  • PRAVIN KUMAR YUMKHAIBAM Uttar Banga Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Pundibari, West Bengal-716 536, India Author
  • KALKAME CH. MOMIN College of Horticulture and Forestry, Pasighat, Arunachal Pradesh-791 102, India Author
  • VELURU BHARGAV College of Agriculture, Pasighat, Arunachal Pradesh-791 102, India Author
  • SUNIL KUMAR North East Hill University, Tura, Meghalaya-794 001, India Author

Keywords:

Cluster analysis, genotypes, principal component analysis, spray chrysanthemum

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to assess the performance for vegetative, flowering, yield, and postharvest traits in spray chrysanthemums. Significant variation was observed amongst the chrysanthemum genotypes for all the characters. The genotype Bidhan Antara recorded maximum plant height (84.75 cm), maximum number of primary branches per plant (14.67), while plant spread (51.58 cm) was observed to be maximum in Bidhan Mallika. Among flowering traits, genotype HCC-1 was the earliest for bud initiation (55.17 days); BC-28 took the minimum days to full bloom (84.33 days), had the maximum spray length (22.90 cm) and vase life (29.83 days). The maximum flower longevity (34.33 days) was noted in genotype Bidhan Sweeta. The genotype Bidhan Shova noted the maximum flower diameter (8.16 cm) and the genotype Pusa Chitraksha had the maximum number of flower heads per plant (185.33), number of flowers/spray (174.00), flower yield per plant (310.19 g), and yield/hectare (297.77 q/ha). Using the Ward method, cluster analysis was done to determine the possible diversity among the genotypes. Twenty genotypes were divided into two major categories viz. cluster 1 and cluster 2. Cluster 1 was further split into two subgroups, cluster Ia, cluster Ib, respectively. The results of principal component analysis were also in conformity with the cluster analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Addinsoft. 2017. XLSTAT 2017: Data analysis and statistical solution for microsoft excel. Paris France. https://www.xlstat.com/en/download

Bhargav, V., Kumar, R., Bharathi, T.U., Dhananjaya, M.V. and Rao, T.M. 2023. Assessment of genetic diversity in China aster [Callistephus chinensis (L.) Nees. Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 18(1): 84-89.

Bhargav, V., Kumar, R., Rao, T.M., Sane, A., Venugopalan, R. and Kumari, P. 2019. Evaluation of China aster [Callistephus chinensis (L.) Nees.] Genotypes for vegetative, flowering, yield and postharvest life. The Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 32(1): 80-84.

Dewan N., Kumar S., Sharma S. and Chakraborty S. 2016. Evaluation of chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat) genotypes under West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. The Hort Flora Research Spectrum, 5(3): 189-194.

Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd edn. Wiley, New York. p. 680.

Henny, T., Palai, S.K., Beura, S., Chongloi, L., Devi, O.B. and Mishra, S. 2021. Evaluation and selection of spray chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat) genotypes suitable for commercial cultivation under coastal plain zone of Odisha. The

Pharma Innovation Journal, 10(4): 124-126.

Jamaluddin, A.F.M., Taufique, T., Ona, A.F., Shahrin, S. and Mehraj, H. 2015. Growth and flowering performance of thirty-two chrysanthemum cultivars. Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research, 4(1): 40-51.

Kumar, R., Prasad, V.M. and Singh, D. 2021. Varietal evaluation of chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora L) under Prayagraj agro-climatic conditions. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 10(12): 245-248.

Madhumathi, C., Bhargav, V., Reddy, D.S., Kameshwari, P.L., Sreedhar, D. and Lakshmi, T.N. 2018. Assessment of chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat) germplasm for commercial cultivation under Rayalaseema region of Andhra Pradesh. Journal of Applied Horticulture, 20(3): 213-218.

Mahale, G.H., Marbhal, S.K., Saha, T.N. and Bhosale, A.B. 2023. Evaluation of chrysanthemum genotypes for pot culture. International Journal of Agricultural and Applied Sciences, 8(1): 39 -42.

Parul, P., Rao, V.K. and Sharma, S.K. 2011. Evaluation of different chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat) genotypes under mid hill conditions of Garhwal Himalaya. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 81(9): 830-833.

Roopa, S., Chandrashekar, S.Y., Shivaprasad, M., Hanumantharaya, L. and Kumar, H. 2018b. Evaluation of chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora Tzvelev) genotypes for floral and quality traits under hill zone of Karnataka, India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(8): 1874-1879.

Siddiqua, A., Lakshmi, K.S., Nagaraju, R. and Reddy, D.S. 2018. Performance of spray chrysanthemum cultivars (Dendranthema grandiflora Tzvelev) in polyhouse conditions. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 7(6): 1572-1575.

Singh, D., Arya, R.K., Chandra, N., Niwas, R. and Salisbury, P. 2016. Genetic diversity studies in relation to seed yield and its component traits in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern & Coss.). Journal of Oilseed Brassica, 1(1): 19-22.

Singh, R.K., Singh, A.K., Kumar, R., Tomar, K.S., Kanwajia, A. and Singh, G.O.A. 2022. Evaluation of different chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum × morifolium Ramat) varieties under Bundelkhand region. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 11(5): 1606-1610.

Srinivas, P.T. and Rajasekharam, T. 2020. Evaluation of marigold genotypes under Tropical conditions of Tirupati. International Archive of Applied Sciences and Technology, 11(20): 85-89.

Suvija, N.V., Suresh, J., Kumar, R.S. and Kannan, M. 2016. Evaluation of chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat) genotypes for loose flower, cut flower and pot mums. International Journal of Innovative Research and Advanced Studies, 3(4): 100-104.

Downloads

Submitted

2025-10-22

Published

2024-05-16

How to Cite

PRAVIN KUMAR YUMKHAIBAM, KALKAME CH. MOMIN, BHARGAV, V. ., & KUMAR, S. . (2024). Assessment of genetic diversity in chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.). Journal of Ornamental Horticulture, 26(1 & 2), 63-71. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/JOH/article/view/151657