Standardization of humic acid with organic and inorganic fertilizers on growth, yield and economics of transplanted rice
74 / 5
Authors
-
Muskan Sinha
-
A.K. Singh
-
Abhinav Kumar
-
ABHINANDAN SINGH
Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology
-
Anamika Patel
-
Prashant Kumar Shrishail Hanjagi
Keywords:
Humic acid, organic manures, inorganic fertilizers, growth, yield, economicsAbstract
Integrated nutrient management approaches that substitute part of inorganic fertilizer inputs with organic and biostimulant sources have the potential to enhance nutrient-use efficiency and sustain crop productivity. A field experiment was conducted during kharif 2025 at the Agronomy Research Farm of Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, India, to evaluate the effects of humic acid and vermicompost in combination with reduced rates of recommended fertilizer dose (RDF) on the growth, productivity and profitability of transplanted rice. The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with eight treatments, each replicated three times. Among the treatments, application of 75% RDF + 5 kg ha-1 humic acid at tillering + 2.5 t ha-1 vermicompost (T6) recorded the highest plant height (106.50 cm), tiller density (468.62 m-2), dry matter accumulation (1046.79 g m-2) and leaf area index (4.87), and was statistically comparable with 75% RDF + 2.5 kg ha-1 humic acid + 2.5 t ha-1 vermicompost (T4) for most growth and yield attributes. Treatment T6 also produced the highest grain yield (5621 kg ha-1) and net return (Rs.73,403 ha-1), whereas the maximum benefit ratio (1.35) was obtained with 75% RDF + 5 kg ha-1 humic acid (T5), primarily due to its lower cost of cultivation. Overall, the results demonstrate that integrating humic acid and vermicompost with 75% RDF can enhance rice growth and productivity while improving economic returns, offering a promising approach for reducing dependence on full rates of inorganic fertilizers.
References
Arun MN, Kumar M, Nori S, Singh A, Tuti MD, Srinivas D, Venkatanna B, Surekha K, Padmavathi Ch and Prasad MS (2019). Effect of seaweed extract as biostimulant on crop growth and yield in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under transplanted condition. Journal of Rice Research 12(2): 45-51
Canellas LP, Canellas NO, da S. Irineu LE, Olivares FL, Piccolo A (2020). Plant chemical priming by humic acids. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture 7: 1-7 DOI: 10.1186/s40538-020-00178-4
Chauhan HK and Singh K (2013). Effect of tertiary combinations of animal dung with agro wastes on the growth and development of earthworm Eisenia fetida during organic waste management, International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture 2: 1-7
Das P, Adak S, and Lahiri Majumder A (2020). Genetic manipulation for improved nutritional quality in rice. Frontiers in Genetics 11: 776
Devi J and Prakash M (2015). Microbial population dynamics during vermicomposting of three different substrates amended with cowdung. Int J Curr Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 4(2): 1086-1092
Elankavi S, Nambi J, Ramesh S, Jawahar S, and Lavanya K (2020). Influence of different doses of fertilizers and foliar spray of nutrients on yield and yield attributes of rice. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology 24(2): 1127-1134
Jindo K, Canellas LP, Albacete A, Figueiredo dos Santos L, Frinhani Rocha RL, Carvalho Baia D, Oliveira Aguiar Canellas N, Goron TL, Olivares FL (2020). Interaction for phosphorous acquisition. Agronomy 10(5): 640
Khan OA, Sofi JA, Kirmani NA, Hassan GI, Bhat SA, Chesti MH, and Ahmad SM (2019). Effect of N, P and K nano-fertilizers in comparison to humic and fulvic acid on yield and economics of red delicious (Malus x domestica Borukh). Rev. Bras. 8: 978-981
Nardi S, Schiavon M and Francioso O (2021). Chemical structure and biological activity of humic substancesdefine their role as plant growth promoters. Molecules 26: 2256 doi:10.3390/molecules26082256
Olaetxea M, Mora V, Baigorri R, Zamarreño AM, and García-Mina JM (2020). The singular molecular conformation of humic acids in solution influences their ability to enhance root hydraulic conductivity and plant growth. Molecules 26(1): 3
Osman EAM, El-Masry AA, and Khatab KA (2013). Effect of nitrogen fertilizer sources and foliar spray of humic and/or fulvic acids on yield and quality of rice plants. Advances in Applied Science Research 4(4): 174-183
Panse VG and Sukhatme PV (1954). Statistical methods for agricultural workers
Rose MT, Patti AF, Little KR, Brown AL, Jackson WR, and Cavagnaro TR (2014). A meta-analysis and review of plant-growth response to humic substances: practical implications for agriculture. Advances in Agronomy 124: 37-89
Shah Z, H Rehman H, M Akhtar T, Alsamadany H, Hamooh BT, Mujtaba T et al. (2018). Humic substances: determining potential molecular regulatory processes in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 9: 263 doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00263
Sinha RK, Hahn G, Singh PK, Suhane RK, and Anthonyreddy A (2011). Organic farming by vermiculture: producing safe, nutritive and protective foods by earthworms (Charles Darwin's friends of farmers), American Journal of Experimental Agriculture 1(4): 363
Sunarya Y, and Tedjaningsih T (2015). Increasing nitrogen fertilizer efficiency on wetland rice by using humic acid. Journal of Tropical Soils 20(3): 143-148
Tahir MM, M Khurshid, MZ Khan, MK Abbasi and MH Kazmi (2011). Lignite-derived humic acid effect on growth of wheat plants in different soils. Pedosphere 21(1): 124-131
Wu S, Li R, Peng S, Liu Q, Zhu X (2017). Effect of humic acid on transformation of soil heavy metals. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 207: 012089 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/207/1/012089
Yang F, Tang C, Antonietti M (2021). Natural and artificial humic substances to manage minerals, ions, water, and soil microorganisms. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50: 6221-6239 doi: 10.1039/D0CS01363C
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ORYZA-An International Journal of Rice
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.