Performance, nutrient uptake and economics of rainfed rice varieties under different crop establishment techniques

Authors

  • Ajay Kumar Paswan Department of Agronomy, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Bihar 848 125
  • Navnit Kumar Department of Agronomy, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Bihar 848 125
  • Sumit Sow Department of Agronomy, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Bihar 848 125

Keywords:

Puddled transplanting, Profitability, Rice, Sahbhagi Dhan, Yield

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the experimental farm of Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa (Samastipur), during kharif 2017. The treatments consisted of three establishment methods (direct seeding of rice, puddled transplanting, unpuddled transplanting) and six varieties (Sahbhagi Dhan, Abhishek, Sabour Ardhjal, DRR-42, Swarna Shreya, and Rajendra Nilam). Results showed that maximum number of panicles (231.2/m2 ), panicle length (28.1 cm), and number of grains per panicle (104.0) were achieved with puddled transplanting. Puddled transplanting showed 8.7% and 9.3% higher grain yields over unpuddled transplanting and direct seeding of rice, respectively. Sahbhagi Dhan recorded the highest number of panicles (230.5/m2 ), panicle length (28.8 cm), and number of grains per panicle (104.5). Sahbhagi Dhan recorded significantly higher grain yield (41.5 q/ha) as compared to Abhishek (39.0 q/ha), DRR 42 (37.0 q/ha), and Rajendra Nilam (36.3 q/ha). Sabour Ardhjal, on the other hand, produced significantly higher straw yield (66.2 q/ha) than the others. Puddled transplanting registered significantly higher gross returns of `76170/ha with a B:C ratio of 1.22. Sahbhagi Dhan registered the highest net returns and B:C ratio, followed by Sabour Ardhjal. So, puddled transp

Downloads

Published

2023-09-04

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Performance, nutrient uptake and economics of rainfed rice varieties under different crop establishment techniques. (2023). Annals of Agricultural Research, 44(2), 141-147. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/AAR/article/view/141915