Canopy management of scattered Prosopis cineraria (L.) trees for sustainable fodder production in agricultural landscape of arid and semi-arid regions


Abstract views: 40 / PDF downloads: 52

Authors

  • Saresh N Agricultural Research Station (Agriculture University Jodhpur) Keshwana, Jalore, Rajasthan
  • Asu Singh Godara Agricultural Research Station (Agriculture University Jodhpur) Keshwana, Jalore, Rajasthan
  • Dharmendra Meena Agricultural Research Station (Agriculture University Jodhpur) Keshwana, Jalore, Rajasthan
  • Arjun Lal Bijarnia Agricultural Research Station (Agriculture University Jodhpur) Keshwana, Jalore, Rajasthan
  • Dileep Kumar Krishi Vigyan Kendra (Agriculture University Jodhpur) Keshwana, Jalore, Rajasthan

Keywords:

Canopy, lopping, carrying capacity, fodder, Prosopis cineraria

Abstract

The experiment was carried out on Prosopis cineraria (L.) trees scattered in the agriculture land scape of Agricultural Research Station, Keshwana, Jalore, Rajasthan. Aim was to standardise the lopping intensity for different girth class of  trees for sustainable fodder production.. Fresh and dry fodder weight was higher in T1 (100 %) than T2 and T3. Among girth class treatment the sequence was G3 > G2 and G1. The combination T1G1 resulted in significantly higher fresh and dry fodder yield for both the year. Such interaction was observed for the combination T1G3 and for T2G2 combination. Percent increase in fresh fodder yield T2G2 combination had highest i.e. 46 %, highest dry fodder yield was observed in combination in T1G1 (35 %). There is increased inclination in carrying capacity, in T1 (0.38), G3 (0.59), and T1G1 (0.12), T1G3 (0.84) and T2G2 (0.19) combinations which supported 61.61, 94.96, 19.13, 136.04 and 31.57 no. of goats ha-1. There is a significant increase in the feed capacity, higher increase was observed for G3 along with T1 & T2 combination. For girth class G2 with T2 & T1 was found to be 9.02  No. ha-1 for 2018-20. Girth class G1 with lopping intensity T1 combination was 6.98 & 3.63 No. ha-1 respectively. Dry fodder yield had significant positive correlation with fresh fodder weight, percent change in fresh fodder weight, percent change in dry fodder production, and fodder feed capacity and significant negative correlation for crown width. It is concluded that for girth class G2- medium and for G1 & G3- heavy intensity lopping should be adopted for higher fodder production, carrying capacity, feeding capacity in Prosopis cineraria trees existing in the scattered agricultural landscape of arid and semi-arid regions

Author Biographies

  • Saresh N, Agricultural Research Station (Agriculture University Jodhpur) Keshwana, Jalore, Rajasthan

    Assistant Professor (Agroforestry)

    Agricultural Research Station
    (Agriculture University Jodhpur)
    Keshwana, Jalore, Rajasthan

     

  • Asu Singh Godara, Agricultural Research Station (Agriculture University Jodhpur) Keshwana, Jalore, Rajasthan

    Assistant Professor (Animal Production)

    Agricultural Research Station
    (Agriculture University Jodhpur)
    Keshwana, Jalore, Rajasthan

  • Dharmendra Meena, Agricultural Research Station (Agriculture University Jodhpur) Keshwana, Jalore, Rajasthan

    Dept. of Agronomy

    Agricultural Research Station
    (Agriculture University Jodhpur)
    Keshwana, Jalore, Rajasthan

  • Arjun Lal Bijarnia, Agricultural Research Station (Agriculture University Jodhpur) Keshwana, Jalore, Rajasthan

    Agrostorology

    Agricultural Research Station
    (Agriculture University Jodhpur)
    Keshwana, Jalore, Rajasthan

  • Dileep Kumar, Krishi Vigyan Kendra (Agriculture University Jodhpur) Keshwana, Jalore, Rajasthan

    Agriculture Extension

    Krishi Vigyan Kendra
    (Agriculture University Jodhpur)
    Keshwana, Jalore, Rajasthan

References

Andre van Tol. 2004. Fodder trees. Agromisa 1-12.

Bhat D M, Ravindranath N H and Gadgil M. 1995. Effect of lopping intensity on tree growth and stand productivity in tropical forest. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 8(1):15-23.

Bisht V, Rana B S and Singh P. 2017. Lopping intensity in Shisham: A review Annals of Biology 33(1):113-116.

Bufford L J and Gaoue O G 2015 Defoliation by pastoralists affects savanna tree seedling dynamics by limiting the facilitative role of canopy cover. Ecological Applications 25, 1319-1329.

Chand P, Sirohi S, Sirohi S K and Chahal V P. 2015. Estimation of demand and supply of livestock feed and fodder in Rajasthan: a disaggregated analysis. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 85 (11): 1229–1234.

FSI. 2019. India State of Forest Report, Forest Survey of India, (Ministry of Environment & Forests, GoI).

Gaoue O G, Horvitz C C, Ticktin T, Steiner U K and Tuljapurkar S 2013 Defoliation and bark harvesting affect life-history traits of a tropical tree. Journal of Ecology 101 (6), 1563-1571.

Ghimire R P, Devkota N R and Tiwari M R 2013 Seasonal Productivity of Flemingia Macrophylla under Different Defoliation Frequencies. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research Agriculture and Veterinary 13 (14), 13-18.

Jaimini SN, Tikka SBS. Khejri based agro forestry system for dry land areas of north and north western Gujarat. Indian Journal of forestry 1998; 21 (4): 331-332.

Jodha NS, Singh NP and Bantilan MCS. 2012. Enhancing Farmers’ Adaptation to Climate Change in Arid and Semi-Arid Agriculture of India: Evidences from Indigenous practices: Developing International Public Goods from Development-oriented Projects. Working Paper Series no. 32. Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. 28 pp.

Kaushal R, Kumar A, Alam NM, Mandal D, Jayaparkash J, Tomar JMS, Patra S, Gupta AK, Mehta H, Panwar P, Chaturvedi OP, Mishra PK (2017) Effect of different canopy management practices on rainfall partitioning in Morus alba. Ecological Engineering 102:374–380.

Kaushal R, Kumar A, Alam NM, Mandal D, Jayaparkash J, Tomar JMS, Patra S, Gupta AK, Mehta H, Panwar P, Chaturvedi OP, Mishra PK (2017) Effect of different canopy management practices on rainfall partitioning in Morus alba. Ecological Engineering 102:374–380.

Kumar K V.S and Tewari, V.P. (2000). Effect of lopping on the top feed production and growth of Prosopis cineraria. Bioresource Technology 74: 165-168.

Kumar V, Jain K. K., Kumar S and Kumhar B L. 2018. Impact of Pruning Intensity on Tree Biomass Production of Dalbergia sissoo Roxb and Fresh Yield of Turmeric. International Journal of Pure and applied Bioscience. 6 (3): 191-195.

Livestock Censes 2019. Departnment of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, (Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying GoI).

Longman K A and Jenik J. 1987. Tropical Forests and its environments. Longman Scientfic and Technical. England: 60-61.

Muhamad N M and .Paudyal K B. 1992. Pruning trial for Acacia mangium willd. plantation in Peninsular Malaysia. Forest Ecology and Management 47(1-4): 285-293.

Nair,P.K.R. (1987). Agroforestry in the Indian Sub continent: Past, present and future. In: Singh, G.B. Steppler, H.A. (Eds.), Agroforestry: a decade of development. International Council for Research in Agroforestry (ICRAF), Nairobi, Kenya. 117-138.

Oyama K and Mendeza A. 1990. Effect of defoliation on growth reproduction and survival of neotropical deciduous palm. Chamaedorea tepejilote Biotropica: 22(2): 199-123.

Petras R .,Kosot M and Oszlanij. 1985 .Listova biomasa stromov smreka, borovice a buka. Lesn. Cas., 31: 121-135.

R. Kaushal . J. Jayaparkash . D. Mandal . Ambrish Kumar . N. M. Alam . J. M. S. Tomar . H. Mehta . O. P. Chaturvedi. 2019. Canopy management practices in mulberry: impact on fine and coarse roots. Agroforest Syst 93:545–556.

R.L. Semwal, R.K. Maikhuri, K.S. Rao, K. Singh and K.G. Saxena. 2002. Crop productivity under differently lopped canopies of multipurpose trees in Central Himalaya, India Agroforestry Systems 56: 57–63.

Rawat,J.K. (1993). Economic considerations in tree lopping. Indian For. 119:703-707.

Roy M M and Debroy. 1983. Lopping studies on Bauhinia purpuria (Linn). My Forest 19(4): 193-196.

Salama, B.L.; A.F. Abou-Hadid; N. Abdelhamid and M.Z. El-Shinawy. 2018. Effect of prunning pattern and soil mulching on yield and quality of keitt mango in new reclaimed landsarab Univ. J. Agric. Sci., 26(1): 147-159

Sardar, M. R. 1990. Effect of conventional lopping of Prosopis cineraria on soil moisture, soil erosion and herbage production. Pak. J. Forestry., 40 : 300-306.

Saxena SK (1997) Traditional agroforestry systems of western Rajasthan. In: Sharma BM (ed) Gupta JP. Agroforestry for Sustained Production in Arid Regions Scientific Publishers, India, pp 21–30.

Sewade C, Azihou A F, Fandohan A B, Houéhanou D T et Houinato M. 2016. Diversité, priorité pastorale et de conservation des ligneux fourragers des terres de parcours en zone soudano-guinéenne du Bénin. Biotechnologie Agronomie Société Et Environnement. 20(2), 113-129.

Sewade C, Azihou1 A F, Fandohan A B, Glèlè Kakaï R L, Mensah G A and Houinato M R B. 2017. Leaf biomass modeling, carrying capacity and species-specific performance in aerial fodder production of three priority browse species Afzelia africana, Pterocarpus erinaceus and Daniellia oliveri. Livestock Research for Rural Development 29 (10): 1-14.

Singh A K. 2018. Feeding management of goat. Indian Farmer 5(09): 995-1000.

Singh J and Bishnoi M. 2010. Effect of lopping intensities on fodder and fuel wood yield of Prosopis cineraria in arid zones of Thar. Research & Review in Bio Science, 4(1):1-3.

Singh J and Bishnoi M. 2014. Effect of lopping intensities on fodder and fuel wood yield of Prosopis cineraria in arid zones of Thar. Academ Arena, 6(10):90-93]. (ISSN 1553-992X).

Singh K A and Thompson F. 1995. Effect of lopping intensities on water potential, regrowth, 14 C-photosynthate distribution and biomass production in Alnus Glutinosa. Tree Physiology 15(3):197-202

Singh, G. S., Mutha, S., & Bala, N. (2007). Effect of tree density on productivity of a Prosopis cineraria agroforestry system in North Western India. Journal of Arid Environments, 70, 152–163.

Srivastava JPL. Lopping studies on Prosopis cineraria. Indian forester 1978; 104: 269-274.

Tewari J C, Ram M, Roy M M and Dagar J C. 2014. Livelihood Security & Ecosystem Services, Advances in Agroforestry In J. C. Dagar et al. (eds.), Agroforestry Systems in India: Springer India; 155-183. DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-1662-9_6.

Tewari JC, (1997) Important fodder trees of arid zone and their management. In: Gupta JP, Sharma BM (eds) Agroforestry for Sustained Productivity, Arid Regions Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, pp 147–153.

Tewari VP. 1998 Effect of lopping on the growth of Acacia tortilis plantations. Indian forester 124(12): 1010-1013.

Tewari, V.P and Singh, Mahenda. 2006. Tree-crop interactionin the Thar Desert of Rajasthan (India).Secheresse. 17(1-2):326-32

Thakur PS, Sehgal S (2001) Effect of canopy management on root parameters in agroforestry tree species of temperate region. Indian J Agrofor 2:75–78.

Thakur PS, Thakur A (2007) Canopy management in agroforetsry-options and strategies. In: Puri S, Panwar P (eds) Agroforestry Systems and Practices. New India Publishing Agency, N Delhi, pp 533–545

Thenua, O. V. S., Verma, R. S. and Singh, T.P. 1999, Effect of subabul (Leucaena leucocephala) canopy on yield, quality and nitrogen uptake of clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) and sesame (Sesamum indicum) under agro-silviculture system. Indian J. Agron, 44(1): 68-72.

Vennila, C., M. Daisy and Bhuvaneswari, J. 2020. Effect of Lopping Interval on the Growth and Fodder Yield of Subabul (Leucaena leucocephala). Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 9(09): 3552-3555. doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.909.440

Verma A, Shiran K., Tewari J.C. Kalia R K, Saresh N. V. Mahesh Gaur and Kumar S. 2017. Agroforestry: A Sustainable, Multifunctional and Diversified Production System for Hot Arid Zone. Edt. by C.B. Pandey, Mahesh Kumar Gaur and R.K. Goyal in “Climate Change and Agroforestry†New India Publishing Agency, New Delhi, India, pp. 251-272.

Downloads

Submitted

06-12-2021

Published

06-07-2022

How to Cite

N, S., Godara, A. S., Meena, D., Bijarnia, A. L., & Kumar, D. (2022). Canopy management of scattered Prosopis cineraria (L.) trees for sustainable fodder production in agricultural landscape of arid and semi-arid regions. Indian Journal of Agroforestry, 24(1). https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJA/article/view/118733