Review: Potential Role of Probiotics in Health and Productivity of Milch Animalsand Milk Composition
227 / 83
Authors
-
Hiral Kumari Patel
-
V.Sreeja
Kamdhenu University
-
K.Durgga Rani
-
S.Kiran
Keywords:
Direct-Fed Microbials, Growth, Milch animals, Probiotics, Rumen MicrobiotaAbstract
Milch animals are a source of nutrition and disposable income for disadvantaged and marginal farmers in developing countries. In addition, these animals provide draught power and manure for use as fuel and fertilizer. In spite of these benefits, there are certain major public health issues. First, sub-therapeutic use of antibiotics as growth promoters in animal feed has evoked widespread concern due to the potential to develop antibiotic resistance in microbial populations associated with animal and human diseases. Second, some of the foodborne zoonotic diseases like salmonellosis, campylobacteriosis and pathogenic Escherichia coli infection, among others, are serious public health concerns around the world and can cause serious economic loss. Probiotics, the beneficial microbes are reported to play a crucial role in in maintaining rumen microflora homeostasis, which in turn can improve milch animal health, feed digestion and nutrient absorption, prevent animal diseases, improve milk productivity and milk quality. Further probiotic containing feed supplements are finding application as alternatives to antibiotics to promote animal growth and health in the dairy industry. In the context of these as well as the potential role of the microbial ecology of the gastro-intestinal tract in determining milch animal productivity, probiotics are being increasingly used in animal nutrition.
References
Abdelbagi, M., Ridwan, R., Fidriyanto, R. and Jayanegara, A. 2021. Effects of probiotics and encapsulated probiotics on enteric methane emission and nutrient digestibility in vitro. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 788, No. 1, p. 012050). DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/788/1/012050.
Agarwal, N., Kamra, D. N., Chaudhary, L. C., Agarwal, I., Sahoo, A. and Pathak, N. N. 2002. Microbial status and rumen enzyme profile of crossbred calves fed on different microbial feed additives. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 34(5): 329-336. DOI: 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2002. 01092.x
Alawneh, J. I., James, A. S., Phillips, N., Fraser, B., Jury, K., Soust, M. and Olchowy, T. W. 2020. Efficacy of a Lactobacillus-based teat spray on udder health in lactating dairy cows. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 7: 584436. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.584436.
AlZahal, O., Li, F., Walker, N. D. and McBride, B. W. 2017. Factors influencing ruminal bacterial community diversity and composition and microbial fibrolytic enzyme abundance in lactating dairy cows with a focus on the role of active dry yeast. Journal of Dairy Science. 100(6): 4377-4393.
Anee, I. J., Alam, S., Begum, R. A., Shahjahan, R. M. and Khandaker, A. M. 2021. The role of probiotics on animal health and nutrition. The Journal of Basic and Applied Zoology. 82: 1-16.
Bajagai, Y. S., Klieve, A. V., Dart, P. J. and Bryden, W. L. 2016. Probiotics in animal nutrition: production, impact and regulation. FAO.
Ban, Y. and Guan, L. L. 2021. Implication and challenges of direct-fed microbial supplementation to improve ruminant production and health. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology. 12(1): 109.
Bidarkar, V. K., Swain, P. S., Ray, S. and Dominic, G. 2014. Probiotics: Potential alternative to antibiotics in ruminant feeding. Trends in Veterinary and Animal Sciences. 1(1): 1-4.
Bitencourt, L. L., Silva, J. R. M., Oliveira, B. M. L. D., Dias Júnior, G. S., Lopes, F., Siécola Júnior, S., ... and Pereira, M. N. 2011. Diet digestibility and performance of dairy cows supplemented with live yeast. Scientia Agricola. 68: 301-307. DOI: 10.1590/S010390162011000300005.
Boyd, J., West, J. W. and Bernard, J. K. 2011. Effects of the addition of direct-fed microbials and glycerol to the diet of lactating dairy cows on milk yield and apparent efficiency of yield. Indian Journal of Dairy Science. 94(9): 4616-4622. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3984.
Chen, J., Harstad, O. M., McAllister, T., Dörsch, P. and Holo, H. 2020. Propionic acid bacteria enhance ruminal feed degradation and reduce methane production in vitro. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A - Animal Science. 69(3): 169-175. DOI: 10.1080/09064702.2020.1737215.
Chiquette, J. 2009. The role of probiotics in promoting dairy production. WCDS Advances in Dairy Technology. 21:143-157.
Codex Alimentarius Commission. 2004. Code of practice on good animal feeding CAC/RCP 54-004. CAC, Rome. http://www.codexalimentarius.org/download/standards/10080/CXP_054e.pdf Accessed 18 October 2022
Desnoyers, M., Giger-Reverdin, S., Bertin, G., Duvaux-Ponter, C. and Sauvant, D. 2009. Meta-analysis of the influence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation on ruminal parameters and milk production of ruminants. Journal of Dairy Science. 92(4): 1620-1632. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2008-1414
Elanthamil, R. and Bandeswaran, C. 2017. Methane emission from ruminants and its mitigating measures using probiotic–A review. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 6(1): 319-325.
European Commission. 2003. Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European parliament and of the council of 22 September 2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition. http:// eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32003R1831&from=EN Accessed 15 December 2014.
Galdeano, C. M., Cazorla, S. I., Dumit, J. M. L., Vélez, E. and Perdigón, G. 2019. Beneficial effects of probiotic consumption on the immune system. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism. 74(2): 115-124. DOI: 10.1159/000496426.
Ghazanfar, S., Anjum, M. I., Azim, A. and Ahmed, I. 2015. Effects of dietary supplementation of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) culture on growth performance, blood parameters, nutrient digestibility and fecal flora of dairy heifers. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 25(1).
Harjanti, D. W. and Sambodho, P. 2020. Effects of mastitis on milk production and composition in dairy cows. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 518, No. 1, p. 012032). IOP Publishing.
Hoffmann, D. E., Fraser, C. M., Palumbo, F. B., Ravel, J., Rothenberg, K., Rowthorn, V. and Schwartz, J. 2013. Probiotics: finding the right regulatory balance. Science. 342(6156): 314-315.
Izuddin, W. I., Loh, T. C., Samsudin, A. A., Foo, H. L., Humam, A. M. and Shazali, N. 2019. Effects of postbiotic supplementation on growth performance, ruminal fermentation and microbial profile, blood metabolite and GHR, IGF-1 and MCT-1 gene expression in post-weaning lambs. BMC Veterinary Research. 15(1): 1-10. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-019-2064-9.
Jeyanathan, J., Martin, C. and Morgavi, D. P. 2014. The use of direct-fed microbials for mitigation of ruminant methane emissions: a review. Animal. 8(2): 250-261.
Jiang, Y., Ogunade, I. M., Qi, S., Hackmann, T. J., Staples, C. R. and Adesogan, A. T. 2017. Effects of the dose and viability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. 1. Diversity of ruminal microbes as analyzed by Illumina MiSeq sequencing and quantitative PCR. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(1): 325-342.
Jing, W., Liu, Q. and Wang, W. 2020. Bifidobacterium bifidum TMC3115 ameliorates milk protein allergy in by affecting gut microbiota: A randomized double‐blind control trial. Journal of Food Biochemistry. 44(11): e13489. DOI: 10.1111/jfbc.13489.
Kayasaki, F., Okagawa, T., Konnai, S., Kohara, J., Sajiki, Y., Watari, K., ... and Ohashi, K. 2021. Direct evidence of the preventive effect of milk replacer–based probiotic feeding in calves against severe diarrhea. Veterinary Microbiology. 254, 108976. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108976.
Kowalski, Z. M., Górka, P., Schlagheck, A., Jagusiak, W., Micek, P. and Strzetelski, J. 2009. Performance of Holstein calves fed milk-replacer and starter mixture supplemented with probiotic feed additive. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences. 18(3): 399-411.
Kritas, S. K., Govaris, A., Christodoulopoulos, G. and Burriel, A. R. 2006. Effect of Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus subtilis supplementation of ewe's feed on sheep milk production and young lamb mortality. The Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health. 53(4): 170-173.
Kumar, K., Chaudhary, L., Agarwal, N. and Kamra, D. 2014. Effect of feeding tannin-degrading bacterial culture (Streptococcus gallolyticus strain TDGB 406) on nutrient utilization, urinary purine derivatives and growth performance of goats fed on Quercus semicarpifolia leaves. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 98(5): 879–885.
Le, O. T., Dart, P. J., Harper, K., Zhang, D., Schofield, B., Callaghan, M. J., ... and McNeill, D. M. 2016. Effect of probiotic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain H57 on productivity and the incidence of diarrhoea in dairy calves. Animal Production Science. 57(5): 912-919.
Ma, Z. Z., Cheng, Y. Y., Wang, S. Q., Ge, J. Z., Shi, H. P. and Kou, J. C. 2020. Positive effects of dietary supplementation of three probiotics on milk yield, milk composition and intestinal flora in Sannan dairy goats varied in kind of probiotics. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 104(1): 44-55. DOI: 10.1111/jpn.13226.
Maamouri, O., Selmi, H. and M’hamdi, N. 2014. Effects of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) feed supplement on milk production and its composition in Tunisian Holstein Friesian cows. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica. 45(3): 170-174.
Maragkoudakis, P. A., Mountzouris, K. C., Rosu, C., Zoumpopoulou, G., Papadimitriou, K., Dalaka, E., ... and Tsakalidou, E. 2010. Feed supplementation of Lactobacillus plantarum PCA 236 modulates gut microbiota and milk fatty acid composition in dairy goats—a preliminary study. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 141: S109-S116. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.03.007.
Marques, R. D. S. and Cooke, R. F. 2021. Effects of ionophores on ruminal function of beef cattle. Animals. 11(10): 2871.
Medellin-Peña, M. J., Wang, H., Johnson, R., Anand, S. and Griffiths, M. W. 2007. Probiotics affect virulence-related gene expression in Escherichia coli O157: H7. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 73(13): 4259-4267. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00159-07.
Nalla K., Manda N.K., Dhillon H.S., Kanade S.R., Rokana N., Hess M. and Puniya A.K. 2022. Impact of Probiotics on Dairy Production Efficiency. Frontiers in Microbiology 13:805963. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.805963
Oetzel, G. R., Emery, K. M., Kautz, W. P. and Nocek, J. E. 2007. Direct-fed microbial supplementation and health and performance of pre-and postpartum dairy cattle: A field trial. Journal of Dairy Science. 90(4): 2058-2068.
Ohya, T., Marubashi, T. and Ito, H. 2000. Significance of fecal volatile fatty acids in shedding of Escherichia coli O157 from calves: experimental infection and preliminary use of a probiotic product. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science. 62(11): 1151–1155.
Olchowy, T. W. J., Soust, M. and Alawneh, J. 2019. The effect of a commercial probiotic product on the milk quality of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 102(3): 2188-2195. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2018-15411.
Peterson, L. W. and Artis, D. (2014). Intestinal epithelial cells: regulators of barrier function and immune homeostasis. Nature Reviews Immunology. 14(3): 141-153. DOI: 10.1038/nri3608.
Pinloche, E., McEwan, N., Marden, J. P., Bayourthe, C., Auclair, E. and Newbold, C. J. 2013. The effects of a probiotic yeast on the bacterial diversity and population structure in the rumen of cattle. PloS one, 8(7): e67824.
Qiao, G. H., Shan, A. S., Ma, N., Ma, Q. Q. and Sun, Z. W. 2010. Effect of supplemental Bacillus cultures on rumen fermentation and milk yield in Chinese Holstein cows. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 94(4): 429-436.
Roos, T. B., Tabeleão, V. C., Dümmer, L. A., Schwegler, E., Goulart, M. A., Moura, S. V., ... and Gil-Turnes, C. 2010. Effect of Bacillus cereus var. Toyoi and Saccharomyces boulardii on the immune response of sheep to vaccines. Food and Agricultural Immunology. 21(2): 113-118.
Saleem, A. M., Zanouny, A. I. and Singer, A. M. 2017. Growth performance, nutrients digestibility, and blood metabolites of lambs fed diets supplemented with probiotics during pre-and post-weaning period. Asian-australas. Journal of Animal Science. 30(4): 523. DOI: 10.5713%2Fajas.16.0691.
Schamberger, G. P., Phillips, R. L., Jacobs, J. L. and Diez-Gonzalez, F. 2004. Reduction of Escherichia coli O157: H7 populations in cattle by addition of colicin E7-producing E. coli to feed. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 70(10): 6053-6060. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.10.6053-6060.2004
Sharma, A. N., Kumar, S. and Tyagi, A. K. 2018. Effects of mannan‐oligosaccharides and Lactobacillus acidophilus supplementation on growth performance, nutrient utilization and faecal characteristics in Murrah buffalo calves. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 102(3): 679-689. DOI: 10.1111/jpn.12878.
Sharma, P., Tomar, S. K., Sangwan, V., Goswami, P. and Singh, R. 2016. Antibiotic resistance of Lactobacillus sp. isolated from commercial probiotic preparations. Journal of Food Safety, 36(1): 38-51.
So, S., Wanapat, M. and Cherdthong, A. 2021. Effect of sugarcane bagasse as industrial by-products treated with Lactobacillus casei TH14, cellulase and molasses on feed utilization, ruminal ecology and milk production of mid-lactating Holstein Friesian cows. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 101: 4481–4489. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.11087
Thota, P., Sarat, C. A., Mahender, M. and Ramana, D. B. V. 2017. Effect of probiotic supplementation on nutrient digestibilities, growth performance and enteric methane emissions in Deccani ram lambs. Journal of Animal Research, 7(6): 1009-1017.
US-FDA. 2015. CPG Sec. 689.100 Direct-Fed Microbial Products. http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/ComplianceManuals/CompliancePolicyGuidanceManual/ucm074707.htm Accessed 27 March 2015.
Weiss, W. P., Wyatt, D. J. and McKelvey, T. R. 2008. Effect of feeding propionibacteria on milk production by early lactation dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 91(2): 646-652.
Younts-Dahl, S. M., Galyean, M. L., Loneragan, G. H., Elam, N. A. and Brashears, M. M. 2004. Dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus-and Propionibacterium-based direct-fed microbials and prevalence of Escherichia coli O157 in beef feedlot cattle and on hides at harvest. Journal of Food Protection. 67(5): 889-893. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-67.5.889.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright remains with the society and author jointly. However, material can be used for research, teaching and to achieve goals of the society.
