EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FEED COMBINATIONS ON NUTRIENT INTAKE AND DIGESTIBILITY IN CROSS-BRED HEIFER


78 / 35

Authors

  • VIVEK PRATAP SINGH Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India
  • MAYANK DUBEY Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India
  • RAJENDRA KUMAR PANDEY Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India

Abstract

ABSTRACT
An experiment was conducted for a period of 360 days to study the nutrient intake,
digestibility of feed as well as economics of replacement heifers fed different feed
combinations of ration. Twenty four (Holstein Friesian × Sahiwal) and (Jersey × Sahiwal)
cross-bred heifer calves of 4 to 6 month of age of 55.27 to 62 kg body weight were divided
Indian J. Anim. Prod. Mgmt. Vol. 31(1-2) 10-15 (2015)
10
Limited feeding of a high-grain diet to
growing cattle has been shown to have positive
effects on cattle performance including decreased
DMI, improved feed conversion and decreased cost
of gain6. Providing supplements with relatively high
protein concentrations to ruminants consuming lowquality
roughage has been shown to enhance
roughage utilization and livestock performance5.
Workers4 demonstrated that feeding cattle a
supplement containing at least 22% crude protein
increased both intake and utilization of low-quality
forage. To optimize productivity it is necessary to
provide the animals with quality feeds to meet
nutrients requirement. Monitoring heifer growth is
an important part of a sound dairy replacement
program. When feeding dairy heifers, a farmer’s
goal is to feed a very digestible diet that will
provide nutrients to keep dairy heifers healthy and
allow them to grow faster, while spending less
money on feed. The objective of this study was to
determine nutrient intake and digestibility of
nutrient in cross-bred heifer calves.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Experimental Animals and Diets
Twenty four HS (Holstein Friesian × Sahiwal)
and JS (Jersy × Sahiwal) healthy female calves of
4 to 5 months of age were selected and divided
into four groups (six in each group) i.e. T1=
Control (Farm ration); T2= 50% Barley + 30% MC
+10% AC + 8% WB 2% MM; T3= 50% Maize +
30% MC +10% AC + 8% WB 2% MM and T4=
50% Sorghum + 30% MC +10% AC + 8% WB
2% MM, respectively. The animals of various
experimental groups were fed farm and self
prepared ration comprising green fodder (MP chari,
Maize, Cow pea and Berseem etc. depending on
seasonal availability) and wheat straw as the dry
roughage along with a balanced concentrate
mixture and mineral (1.5 kg concentrate per
animal/day from 4 to 6 months and 2.0 kg from 7
to 15 months of age) to meet the requisite
nutritional requirements. The quantity of diet offered
was calculated for each individual animal (dry
matter basis). The experimental calves were similar
in respect to size, health, body weight and age.
Before the start of experiment all the animals were
dewormed against internal and external parasites.
The quantity of daily feed offered to each animal of
the respective group and the residual left was
recorded for a period of 360 days to calculate the
average daily feed intake.
Digestion trial
Representative samples of feed, left over and
faeces were subjected to chemical analysis for
determination of crude protein, crude fibre, ether
extract, ash and nitrogen free extract following the
standard method2. A digestibility trial of 7 days
duration, at seven, eleven and fifteen months of the
experimental trial, was conducted to determine the
digestibility coefficient of dry matter, organic
into four equal groups viz T1 (control), T2, T3 and T4. The four groups of cross-breed heifers
namely fed as T1= Control (Farm ration), T2= 50% Barley + 30% MC +10% AC + 8% WB +
2% MM, T3= 50% Maize + 30% MC +10% AC + 8% WB + 2% MM and T4= 50% Sorghum +
30% MC +10% AC + 8% WB + 2% MM, different feed combinations were made in order to
judge the effect of different feeds on nutrients intake and its digestibility at different months.
Significantly higher (p<0.05) nutrient intake (DM, CP, TDN and ME) was observed in the
group T3. The digestibility of nutrients (DM, OM, CP, EE, CF and NFE) were also significantly
higher (p<0.05) in T3 group. The total cost per heifer was highest in T4 followed by T3, T2 and
lowest in T1 groups respectively.
Key words: Feed combination, nutrient intake, digestibility of nutrients, economics, cross-bred
heifer.

References

REFERENCES

Afzal-Hussain, Sultan J.I, and Zia-ul-Hasan

(2001). Supplementation effect of protein and

energy on nutrient digestion and N

metabolism of buffalo calves fed wheat straw

based diets. Pakistan J. Agric. Sci. 38: 3-4.

AOAC. (1990). Official Methods of Analysis

(15th ed.). Association of official Analytical

Chemist, Arlington, VA. Banerjee, G. C. 1998.

A Text Book of Animal Husbandry, 8th ed.,

Oxford and IBH Pub. Co. Ltd., New Delhi,

India.

Beaty, J.L., Cochran, R.C., Lintzenich, B.A.,

Vanzant, E.S., Morrill, J.L., Jr. Brandt, R.T,

and Johnson, D.E (1994). Effect of frequency

of supplementation and protein concentration

in supplements on performance and digestion

characteristics of beef cattle consuming lowquality

forages. J. Anim. Sci. 72: 2475-2486.

DelCurto, T., Cochran, R.C., Harman, D.L.,

Beharka, A.A., Jacques, K.A., Towne, G. and

Vanzant, E.S (1990). Supplementation of

dormant tallgrass-prairie forage: 1. Influence of

varying supplemental protein and (or) energy

levels on forage utilization characteristics of

beef steers in confinement. J. Anim. Sci. 68:

-531.

Gilbery, T.C., Lardy, G.P., Soto-Navarro, S.A.,

Bauer, M.L. and Caton, J.S (2006). Effects of

corn condensed distillers solubles

supplementation on ruminal fermentation,

digestion, and in situ disappearance in steers

consuming low-quality hay. J. Anim. Sci. 84:

-1480.

Klinger, S.A., Campbell, J., Wildeman, B.,

Block, H. and McKinnon, J. J (2007). The

effects of limit feeding a high-energy barleybased

diet to back grounding cattle in western

Canada. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 87: 385–391.

Krishna Prasad, Sahu, D.S. and Agrawal, I.S

(2000). Effect of defaunation and two levels of

protein on nutrient utilisation and growth of

crossbred heifers. Indian Journal of Animal

Nutrition. 17(1): 23-27.

SAS, User’s Guide. (2003). Statistical

analysis system institute, Inc. Cary, NC,USA.

Singh, S.P., Verma, D.N. and Lal, S. N

(2000). Digestibility of nutrients and growth

rate in crossbred cow calves fed on rations of

different levels of crude protein content. Int. J.

Anim. Sci. 15(2): 209-2 12.

Trishna, B., Kayastha, Sanjeeb Dutta, Rajeeb,

B., Kayastha and Rijusmita S. Deka (2012).

Growth Performance and Nutrient Utilization of

Growing Calves with Urea Treated Wheat Straw

Based Ration. Indian J. Dairy Sci. 65(5).

Umunna, N.N., Dakintafo, A. and Carew, S.N

(1980). Influence of levels of dietary protein on

performance and carcass characteristics of

Zebu steers fed high energy rations. Tropical

Anim. Prod. 5: 161-164.

Downloads

Submitted

25-08-2017

Published

05-09-2017

How to Cite

SINGH, V. P., DUBEY, M., & PANDEY, R. K. (2017). EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FEED COMBINATIONS ON NUTRIENT INTAKE AND DIGESTIBILITY IN CROSS-BRED HEIFER. Indian Journal of Animal Production and Management, 31(1-2). https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAPM/article/view/73633