PERFORMANCE OF BROILER CHICKEN ON TWO REARING SYSTEMS
90 / 30
Abstract
ABSTRACT
240 day-old commercial broiler chicks of Vencob strain was randomly divided into 4
groups i.e. two groups each for hover (Groups 1 and 2) and battery (Groups 3 and 4) types
of brooding. All groups were sub divided into 4 replicates each with 15 chicks in per
replicate. They were reared with standard feeding and hygienic management. On 22 day, 60
birds each from hover (Group 1) and battery (Group 4) brooding were subjected to deep-litter
system of rearing and designated as T1 and T2, respectively. Similarly, 60 birds each from
hover (Group 2) and battery (Group 3) brooding were subjected to cage system of rearing
and designated as T3 and T4, respectively and were reared for 42 days. Mean body weight
was significantly (P < 0.05) better in T3 as compared to other groups. Feed consumption
was significantly (P < 0.05) lower in T4 as compared to other groups. Gain in body weight
did not differ irrespective of treatments. Feed conversion efficiency (FCE) and performance
index were significantly (P < 0.05) better in T3 than other groups. Other parameters like
liveability, carcass characteristics, dressing percentage and net profit was better in caged
birds. From the results, it can be concluded that the performance in terms of growth, feed
consumption, FCE, performance index and net profit was better in cage system than deep
litter systems of rearing.
Key words: Carcass, deep-litter, feed conversion efficiency, performance index.
References
REFERENCES
Amutha, R., Sundaresan, K. and
Viswanathan. 2001. Effect of stocking density
and system of management on egg
production parameters. Indian Journal of
Poultry Science, 36: 18-22.
Bhat, G. A. 1993. Cage layer fatigue- An
important problem in cage layer operation.
Poultry Adviser, 26: 61-62.
Bird, H. R. 1955. Performance index of
growing chicken. Poultry Science, 34: 1163-
BIS. 1998. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS:
-1992, Manak Bhawan, 9 Bahadur Shah
Zafar Marg, New Delhi.
Dhir, D. S. and Trehan, P. K. 1993.
Alternative housing system for poultry
breeding. Poultry Guide, January: 45-46.
Dutta, K. K. 1998. Studies on cost factors
and economy of production of White Leghorn,
Miri birds and their crosses under litter, cage
and free range system of management. Indian
Journal of Animal Production and
Management, 14 (4): 206-208.
Fouzder, S. K., Ali, M. L., Howlider, M. A. R.
and Khan, N. R. M. Z. 1999. Performance of
growing Japanese quails in cages on slated
floor and on littered floor. Indian Journal of
Poultry Science, 69:1059-1062.
Kumar, A., Upreti, M. C. and Joshi, M. C.
Performance of layers housed in
California cages and deep litter in hills.
Poultry Guide, April: 25-29.
Rangareddy, P., Ulaganathan, V.,
Gopalakrishnan, C. A. and Kothandaraman, P.
A comparison between production
practices in egg pockets of Tamil Nadu.
Indian Journal of Poultry Science, 24: 173-
Rao, P. V. 1983. Importance of housing
systems for White Leghorn layers. Poultry
Guide, December: 31-39.
Shanmugasundaram, S., Ulaganathan, V. and
Kothandaraman, P. 1994. Effect of cage
versus floor rearing, density, season and sex
on broiler production. International Journal
Animal Science, 9:109-111.
Sharma, M. L. and Bhatti, J. S.1991. Broiler
raising under two management conditions.
Poultry Guide, November: 21-23.
Sivakumar, K., Muralidharan, M. R.,
Viswanathan, K. and Radhakrishanan, K. T.
Microclimate and production
performance of commercial layers under
different roof types and rearing systems.
Indian Journal of Poultry Science, 37: 258-
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. 1994.
Statistical Methods. 8th edition. Oxford and
IBH Publishing Company, New Delhi.
Swain, B. K., Sundaram, R. N. S.,
Barbuddhe, S. B. and Nirmale, A. V. 2002.
Influence of cage and deep litter rearing
systems on the performance of broilers.
Indian Veterinary Journal, 79:53-55.
Thamilvanan, T., Thiagarajan, M., Ramesh, V.,
Gnanaraj, P. T. and Sivakumar. 2001.
Performance of broiler chicken under cage
and floor systems of management fed
differently processed feeds. Indian Journal of
Animal Sciences, 71: 985-988.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright lies with the publisher.