Deciphering drivers of using ICT among academia of agricultural sciences

D K PANDEY; P ADHIGURU; PRABHAT KUMAR; B N HAZARIKA

doi:10.56093/ijas.v90i3.101483

Authors

D K PANDEY Central Agricultural University, Pasighat
P ADHIGURU Agricultural Extension Division, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, KAB-I, Pusa, New Delhi.
PRABHAT KUMAR Education Division, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, KAB-I, Pusa, New Delhi
B N HAZARIKA Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi.

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i3.101483

Keywords:

Digital technology, Educational policy, ICT, Northeast India, Technology integration

Abstract

Across the globe, investment in ICT to improve teaching and learning in educational institutions have been initiated by Governments. Despite all these investments on ICT infrastructure, equipment and professional development to improve education in many countries, ICT adoption and integration in teaching and learning have so far been limited. This paper investigates the factors influencing the usage of ICT tools among academia of agricultural sciences in north eastern hill states of India which is landlocked and poorly connected with the outside world. ICT can play a crucial role in overcoming its geographical exclusion and help in developing its human resource globally competitive. Slow internet speed and poor ICT infrastructure were reported as principal factors that severely affect the usage of ICT tools among the academia of agricultural sciences in north eastern hill states of India. Level of competency of teachers on ICT is also identified as a barrier. A few key measures to overcome these impediments and for facilitating greater usage of ICT in education are suggested. The findings of this study would be of practical importance to the academic administrators and civil society organizations whose aim is to provide quality higher education by integrating costeffective capabilities of ICT in teaching and learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonymous. 2018. Northeast states lag behind in internet, mobile connectivity https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/guwahati/ northeast-states-lag-behind-in-internet-mobile-connectivity/ articleshow/67168080.cms (Accessed 13 July 2019).

Afshari M, Bakar K A, Luan W S, Samah B A and Fooi F S. 2009. Factors affecting teachers' use of information and communication technology. International Journal of Instruction 2(1): 77–104.

Aramide K A, Ladipo S O and Adebayo I. 2015. Demographic Variables and ICT Access as Predictors of Information Communication Technologies' Usage among Science Teachers in Federal Unity Schools in Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice (e- Journal) 1217.

Castro W F and Nyvang T. 2018. From professors’ barriers to organisational conditions in ICT integration in higher education. TidsskriftetLæringOgMedier (LOM) 10(18): 1–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v10i18.96143

Hsu P S and Sharma P. 2008. A case study of enabling factors in the technology integration change process. Educational Technology and Society 11(4): 213–28.

Kemp S. 2017. Digital in 2017. Global overview. Available online: http://wearesocial.com/uk/blog/2017/01/digital-in-2017-globaloverview (Accessed 11 May 2019).

Mcketta I. 2018. India’s digital divide: how broadband speed splits the nation, https://www.speedtest.net/insights/blog/india-statecity- broadband-speeds-2018/.(Accessed 15 July 2019).

Mondal A and Mete J. 2012. ICT in higher education: opportunities and challenges. Institutions 21(60): 4–11.

Murphy E and Rodríguez-Manzanares M A. 2014. Activity Theory Perspectives on Technology in Higher Education.IGIGlobal. Available online:https://www.igi-global.com/book/activitytheory- perspectives-technology-higher/76731 (Accessed 11 May 2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4590-5

Nivala M. 2009. Simple answers for complex problems: Education and ICT in Finnish information society strategies. Media, Culture and Society 31(3): 433–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443709102715

Ottestad G. 2010. Innovative pedagogical practice with ICT in three Nordic countries – Differences and similarities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 26: 478–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00376.x

Sherry L and Gibson D. 2002. The path to teacher leadership in educational technology. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 2(2): 178–203.

Teknikdelegationen. 2010. The future of learning in today’s schools [electronic resource]. Available online http://www. teknikdelegationen.se/bazment/knikdelegationen/download. aspx?id=Rapport20101 (Accessed 21 May 2019).

Teo T, Chai C S, Hung D and Lee C B. 2008.Beliefs about teaching and uses of technology among pre-service teachers. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 36(2):163–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13598660801971641

Yusuf F, Owolabi S, Aregbesola A, Oguntayo S, Okocha F and Eyiolorunse T. 2016. Demographics, Socio-Economic and Cognitive Skills as Barriers to Information Seeking in a Digital Library Environment. In Information Seeking Behavior and Challenges in Digital Libraries (pp. 179–202), IGI Global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0296-8.ch009

Ziemba E. 2016. Factors affecting the adoption and usage of ICTs within Polish households. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management 11: 89–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/3507