Performance evaluation of plants raised through different propagation methods in pomegranate (Punica granatum)


496 / 124

Authors

  • N V SINGH ICAR-National Research Centre on Pomegranate, Solapur, Maharashtra 413 255, India
  • SHILPA PARASHURAM ICAR-National Research Centre on Pomegranate, Solapur, Maharashtra 413 255, India
  • P ROOPASOWJANYA ICAR-National Research Centre on Pomegranate, Solapur, Maharashtra 413 255, India
  • K D BABU ICAR-National Research Centre on Pomegranate, Solapur, Maharashtra 413 255, India
  • D M MUNDEWADIKAR ICAR-National Research Centre on Pomegranate, Solapur, Maharashtra 413 255, India
  • VIPUL SANGNURE ICAR-National Research Centre on Pomegranate, Solapur, Maharashtra 413 255, India
  • JYOTSANA SHARMA ICAR-National Research Centre on Pomegranate, Solapur, Maharashtra 413 255, India
  • R K PAL ICAR-National Research Centre on Pomegranate, Solapur, Maharashtra 413 255, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i4.102150

Keywords:

Micro-propagation, Pomegranate, PLW, Planting material

Abstract

Disease free and elite planting material propagated through in vitro propagation may prevent the spread of diseases particularly bacterial blight through infected planting material. However, there are certain misapprehensions about fruit quality of harvest from micro-propagated plants as compared to air layered or hardwood cutting raised plants. Keeping these facts under consideration, an elaborate study on comparative qualitative and quantitative evaluation of harvest from different types of planting material had been carried out during 2015-17 at ICAR-NRC on Pomegranate, Solapur. The terminal bearing non-significantly ranged from 25 to 28.30% across the different types of planting material. Fruit weight and aril to fruit ratio were found at par in harvest from the three types of planting material. Rind thickness and PLW, which generally play critical role in governing fruit shelf life, were also found at par in fruits from all the three types of planting materials. The rind to fruit ratio of fruits from hardwood cutting raised plants (0.41) was found significantly higher than air layered plants. The maximum ‘L*’ and ‘b*’ values of fresh fruits were recorded for fruits from air layered plants (60.76 and 31.65, respectively) and ‘a*’ value for fruits from TC raised plants (39.70). The results proved parity among fruit quality of harvests from different types of planting material in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cv. Bhagwa.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Babu K D, Singh N V, Chandra R, Sharma J, Maity A and Pal R K. 2015. Improvement in keeping quality of pomegranate fruits during storage (Punica granatum). Research on Crops 16(2): 281–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2348-7542.2015.00041.8

Babu K D, Singh N V, Gaikwad N N, Maity A, Suryawanshi S and Pal R K. 2017. Determination of maturity indices for harvesting of pomegranate (Punica granatum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 87(9): 1225–30.

Chand R and Kishun R 1993. Systemic movement of Xanthomonas campestris pv. punicae (Hingorani and Singh) dye from leaf to node in pomegranate. International Journal Tropical Plant Disease 11: 85–90.

Gaikwad N N, Pal R K, Suryavanshi S, Babu K D, Maity A and Sarkar S. 2017. Effect of extraction method and thermal processing on retention of bioacvtive compounds of pomegrante (Punica granatum) (cv. Bhagwa) juice. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 87(11): 1445–52.

Gomez K A and Gomez A A. 1983. Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.

Naik R, Prasad M D and Joshi V. 2017. Shelf life and quality of minimally processed pomegranate arils cv. Bhagwa as influenced by antioxidants. International Journal of Pure and Applied Bioscience 5(4): 1022–7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.5616

Nath N and Randhawa G S. 1959. Studies on cytology of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). Indian Journal of Horticulture 16: 210–5.

NHB. 2017. Horticultural Statistics at a Glance 2017. Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi (www.agricoop.nic.in).

Ranganna S. 2001. Handbook of Analysis and Quality Control for Fruit and Vegetable Products, 2nd edition. Tata McGraw–Hill, New Delhi.

Ravikumar M R, Shamarao J, Yenjereapp S T and Patil H B. 2009. Epidemiology and management of bacterial blight of pomegranate caused by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. punicae. Acta Horticulturae 818: 291–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.818.43

Sharma J, Chandra R, Babu K D, Meshram DT, Maity A, Singh N V and Gaikwad N N. 2014. Pomegranate: Cultivation, Marketing and Utilization. Technical Bulletin No. NRCP/2014/1. ICAR–National Research Centre on Pomegranate, Solapur, Maharashtra.

Sharma J, Sharma K K and Jadhav V T. 2012. Diseases of pomegranate. Diseases of Fruit Crops, pp 181–224. Misra A K, Chowdappa P, Sharma P and Khetrapal R K. (Eds). Indian Phytopathological Society, New Delhi. India.

Sheela V L and Nair S R. 2001. Growth, flowering and yield potential of tissue culture banana (Musa AAB cv. Nendran). Journal of Tropical Agriculture 39: 1–4.

Shwartz E, Glazer I, Bar–Ya'akov I, Matityahu I, Bar–Ilan I, Holland D and Amir R. 2009. Changes in chemical constituents during the maturation and ripening of two commercially important pomegranate accessions. Food Chemistry 115: 965–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.01.036

Singh N V, Babu K D, Maity A, Sharma J and Pal R K. 2017. Elite planting material in pomegranate : a key to productive orchard. (In) Souvenir, 2nd National Seminar–Cum–Farmers’ Fair on Pomegranate for health, growth and prosperity, ICAR–NRCP and Society of Advancement of Research on Pomegranate (SARP), Solapur, Maharashtra, April 28-30, pp 84–93.

Smith P M. 1976. Minor Crop. Evolution of Crop Plants, pp 301–24. Simmonds NW (Ed). Longman, London.

Tehranifar A, Zarei M, Nemati Z, Esfandiyari B and Vazifeshenas M R. 2010. Investigation of physico–chemical properties and antioxidant activity of twenty Iranian pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae 126: 180–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.07.001

Downloads

Submitted

2020-07-08

Published

2020-07-10

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SINGH, N. V., PARASHURAM, S., ROOPASOWJANYA, P., BABU, K. D., MUNDEWADIKAR, D. M., SANGNURE, V., SHARMA, J., & PAL, R. K. (2020). Performance evaluation of plants raised through different propagation methods in pomegranate (Punica granatum). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 90(4), 685-688. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i4.102150
Citation