Land structure and level of fragmentation in typical small-marginal agricultural holdings in India

SNEHA ROY; ASHOK KUMAR SINGH; SAMIR KUMAR BERA; SHRADDHA BHATTACHARYA

doi:10.56093/ijas.v90i4.102205

Authors

SNEHA ROY Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, West Bengal 741 252, India
ASHOK KUMAR SINGH Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, West Bengal 741 252, India
SAMIR KUMAR BERA Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, West Bengal 741 252, India
SHRADDHA BHATTACHARYA Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, West Bengal 741 252, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i4.102205

Keywords:

Land fragmentation, Land ownership, Land structure, Resource competition, Simpson Index

Abstract

Farming in the Indian subcontinent is essentially small and marginal. With time, land size is fast declining and farmers are under pressure of generating more and more surplus under extreme resource competition. Land fragmentation has also increased severely in recent times, which might pose a threat to sustainability and food security soon by making agriculture unprofitable. The present study aims to portray the dismal condition of the land structure and level of land fragmentation of 141 small-marginal farming households in one of the most fertile agro-ecological villages of West Bengal in India, Rautari village in Chakdah block situated in Nadia district. Present investigation was conducted through well-structured field studies during 2016–17. The study reveals the existence of very traditional patriarchal land ownership patterns, and lack of women’s inclusion from property ownership rights. Farmlands are extremely fragmented with a high value of Simpson Index. Moreover, farmers with high technical efficiency fragment it even more to accommodate a greater number of crops in one growing season. A positive relation between farm area and production is derived from field data. Based on the prevailing situation, indicated by results, the study designed a comprehensive community and land resources utilization plan for the development of the community in the study area. The proposed comprehensive community and land resources utilization plan is a structured tool for extension services which will strengthen the capacity building programs for small-marginal farmers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Banerjee A V. 1999. Prospects and Strategies for Land Reforms. (In) Proceedings of Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, Washington DC, World Bank, B. Pleskovic and J Stiglitz (Eds), pp 254–84.

Basu A. 2014. Land Reform and Agricultural Productivity in India. http://blogs.colgate.edu/economics/files/2014/09/Basu-2014-Land- Reform-and-Agricultural-Productivity-in-India.pdf.

Barrett C B. 1996. On price risk and the inverse farm sizeproductivity relationship. Journal of Development Economics 51(2): 193–215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(96)00412-9

Cornia G A. 1985. Farm size, land yields and the agricultural production function: An analysis for fifteen developing countries. World Development 13(4): 513–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(85)90054-3

Deininger K, Monchuk D, Singh S K, and Nagarajan H K. 2014. Does Land Fragmentation Increase the Cost of Cultivation? Evidence from India. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 7085, 53:82–98. http://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.201 6.1166210 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2016.1166210

Demetriou D, Stillwell J and See L. 2014. A new methodology for measuring land fragmentation. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 39: 71–80. http://doi.org/10.1016/j. compenvurbsys.2013.02.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.02.001

Hristov J. 2009. Assessment of the impact of high fragmented land upon the productivity and profitability of the farms: the case of the Macedonian vegetable growers. Faculty of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.

Ghosh A K. 1983. Agrarian Reform in West Bengal-Objectives, Achievements and Limitations. Ghosh A.K. (Ed), pp 1–378.

Agrarian Reform in Contemporary Developing Countries. International Labour Organization, Geneva.

Lusho S and Papa D. 1998. Land Fragmentation and Consolidation in Albania. University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Maji S, Chakraborty A J, Bera B K and Nandi A K. 2015. A Study on the Extent of Crop Diversification in West Bengal. Diversification of Agriculture in Eastern India, pp 79–87. Springer India. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1997-2_7

Monchuk D, Deininger K, and Nagarajan H. 2010. Does land fragmentation reduce efficiency: Micro evidence from India?Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.17. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6550669.pdf

Niroula G S and Thapa G B. 2007. Impacts and causes of land fragmentation, and lessons learned from land consolidation in South Asia. Land Use Policy 22(4): 358–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.10.001

Olney D K, Talukder A, Iannotti L L, Ruel M T and Quinn V. 2009. Assessing impact and impact pathways of a homestead food production program on household and child nutrition in Cambodia. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 30(4): 355–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/156482650903000407

Paudel G S. 2001. “Farmers’ land management practices in the hills of Nepal: A comparative study of watersheds with and without external intervention”. Ph D Thesis, Asian Institute of Technology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002670010262

Pingali P L and Binswanger H P. 1987. Population density and agricultural intensification: a study of the evolution of technologies in tropical agriculture. Population growth and development: issues and evidence. Johnson D G and Lee R D (Eds), pp 27–56. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin.

Jha R, Nagarajan H and Prasanna S. 2005. Land Fragmentation and its Implications for Productivity: Evidence from Southern India. Sharma D D and Chand M A I. 20. Market - led extension: issues and challenges for extension personnel 4(3): 201–6.

Van D T. 2003. Scenarios of Central European land fragmentation. Land Use Policy 20: 149–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(02)00082-0