Effect of soilless media on nutrient uptake and yield of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)


878 / 553

Authors

  • Ranjit Singh Spehia Dr Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Himachal Pradesh 173 230, India
  • Shailesh Kumar Singh Dr Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Himachal Pradesh 173 230, India
  • Meera Devi Dr Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Himachal Pradesh 173 230, India
  • Nirmla Chauhan Dr Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Himachal Pradesh 173 230, India
  • Sukhpreet Singh Dr Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Himachal Pradesh 173 230, India
  • Deepak Sharma Dr Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Himachal Pradesh 173 230, India
  • Jagjeet Chand Sharma Dr Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Himachal Pradesh 173 230, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i4.102212

Keywords:

Cocopeat, Nutrient uptake, Soilless cultivation, Vermicompost

Abstract

Soilless culture provides an alternative to soil culture when serious soil problems (i.e. soil borne pests, soil salinity, chemical residues in soil, lack of fertile soil) create difficulties in traditional soil-based production. Soilless culture includes growing media, like cocopeat, vermiculite, perlite etc. or hydroponics system. The study was conducted during 2016 and 2017 to standardize growing media for soilless tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) production at Department of Soil Science and Water Management, Dr Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India. The treatments consisted of different growing media, viz. cocopeat alone (control), cocopeat + vermicompost (70:30) and vermiculite + vermicompost (70:30). Plants were irrigated and fertigated with equal amount of Hoagland nutrient solution for meeting nutrient requirement. Treatment containing cocopeat + vermicompost (70:30) increased the nutrient uptake of N , P and K which was evident by the increased yield vis-à-vis control, i.e. cocopeat, alone. The results indicate that growing media consisting of cocopeat + vermicompost (70:30) enhances the quality and yield of tomato over the generally preferred growing media i.e. cocopeat, alone. The findings of the study will be helpful for the growers for enhancing the quality and yield of tomato under protected conditions to escape the problems faced in soil-based production system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abak K and Celikel G. 1994. Comparison of some Turkish originated organic and inorganic substrates for tomato soilless culture. Acta Horticulturae 366: 423–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1994.366.52

Anonymous. 2016. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online: http://www.fao.org/statistics/ en (accessed on 18 April, 2018)

Arancon N Q, EdwardC A, Bierman P,Metzger J D, LeeS and Welch C. 2003. Effect of vermicompost on growth and marketable fruits of field grown tomatoes, peppers and strawberries. Pedobiologia 47(5-6): 731–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1078/0031-4056-00251

Atiyeh R M, SublerS, Edwards C A and Metzger J. 1999. Growth of tomato plants in horticulture potting media amended with vermicompost. Pedobiologia 43: 724–8.

Awang Y, Shaharom A S, Mohamad R B and Selamat A. 2009. Chemical and physical characteristics of cocopeat-based media mixtures and their effects on the growth and development of Celosia cristata. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4(1): 63–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3844/ajabssp.2009.63.71

Dominguez J. 2004. State of the art and new perspectives on vermicompost research. In: Earthworm Ecology, 2nd ed, pp. 401-424. Edwards C A (Ed). CRC press, Boca Raton, FL: USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420039719.ch20

El Sunafawi M E, SalamaG M and El Kafarawy A A. 2005. Effect of different level of compost on yield, microorganisms and quality of cucumber grown in plastic house conditions. Egypt Journal of Agriculture Research 84(4): 55–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/ejar.2006.233567

Ghehsareh A M, Samadi N and Borji H. 2011. Comparison of date-palm wastes and perlite as growth substrates on some tomato growing indexes. African Journal of Biotechnology 10(24): 4871–8.

Jackson M L. 1973. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.

Joseph A and Muthuchamy I. 2014. Productivity, quality and economics of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) cultivation in aggregate hydroponics –A case study from Coimbatore region of Tamil Nadu. Indian Journal of Science and Technology 7(8): 1078–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2014/v7i8.16

Lopez F S, BautistaR Z, CastilloF S D, Mhernandez J J M, VargasJ V and Chavez L T. 2014. Growth and yield of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) as affected by hydroponics, greenhouse and irrigation regimes. Annual Research and Review in Biology 4(24): 4246–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ARRB/2014/11936

Ranganna S. 1995. Handbook of Analysis and Quality Control for Fruit and Vegetable Products. p 1112. Tata McGraw-Hill Education Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi..

Raviv M, Wallach R and Blom T J. 2004. Effect of physical properties of soilless media on plant performance- a review. Acta Horticulturae 644: 251–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.644.34

Sezen M S, Celikel G, Yazar A, Tekin S and Kapur B.2010. Effect of irrigation management on yield and quality of tomatoes grown in different soilless media in a glasshouse. Scientific Research and Essay 5(1): 41–8.

Soltani M and Naderi D.2016. Yield compounds and nutrient elements of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllusL.) under different growing media. Open Journal of Ecology 6: 184–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2016.64019

Spehia R S. 2015. Status and impact of protected cultivation in Himachal Pradesh, India. Current Science 108: 2254–7.

Taghizadeh M, ShahrjerdiI and Ahsani M. 2014. Compare the different media on the growth characteristics of sports turf. Journalof Horticulture, Forestry and Biotechnology 18(4): 1–6.

Ten H M and Kirienko O A. 2002. Effect of vermicompost on structure of the microbial community of greenhouse soil and growth of cucumber. Egypt Journal of Agriculture Research 7: 75–8.

Truong H D and Wang C H. 2015. Studies on the effects of vermicompost on physicochemical properties and growth of two tomato varieties under greenhouse conditions. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 46(12): 1494–506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2015.1043450

Truong H D, Wang C H and Kien T T. 2018. Effect of vermicompost in media on growth, yield and fruit quality of cherry tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under net house conditions. Compost Science and Utilization 26(1): 52–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1065657X.2017.1344594

Xiong J, TianY, WangJ, LiuW and Chen Q.2017. Comparison of coconut coir, rockwool, and peat cultivations for tomato production: nutrient balance, plant growth and fruit quality. Frontiers in Plant Science 8: 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01327

Downloads

Submitted

2020-07-10

Published

2020-07-10

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Spehia, R. S., Singh, S. K., Devi, M., Chauhan, N., Singh, S., Sharma, D., & Sharma, J. C. (2020). Effect of soilless media on nutrient uptake and yield of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 90(4), 732-735. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i4.102212
Citation